Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm applied to inverse finite element analysis: T-joint welding case study

References

• Alves VDJ. Desenvolvimento de envelopes operacionais para processo MIG/MAG robotizado com diferentes gases de proteção [Master’s Thesis]. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Machado IG. Soldagem e técnicas conexas: processos; 1996 [cited 2020 Oct 10]. p. 488. Portuguese. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/213243
   Google Scholar
• Bezerra AC, Rade DA. Análise Térmica do Processo de Soldagem TIG via Elementos Finitos. Simpósio do Programa de Pós Graduação em Engenharia Mecânica-Faculdade de Engenharia Mecânica; Uberlândia (MG): Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; 2004. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Lostado LR, Escribano GR, Martínez CMA, et al. Improvement in the design´ of welded joints of EN 235JR low carbon steel by multiple response surface methodology. Metals. 2016;6(9):205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olabi AG, Lorza RL, Benyounis KY. Quality control in welding process. Compr Mater Process. 2014;6:193–212.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães RR, Vieira AB Jr, Barra SR. The use of conventional strain gauges evaluation for measurements of residual stresses in welded joints. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2013;36:173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lostado R, Martinez RF, Mac Donald BJ, et al. Combining soft computing techniques and the finite element method to design and optimize complex welded products. Integr Comput-Aided Eng. 2015;22(2):153–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez RF, Lorza RL, Bobadilla MC, et al. Adjust the thermo-mechanical properties of finite element models welded joints based on soft computing techniques. International Conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems; Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 699–709.
   Google Scholar
• Ueda Y, Murakawa H, Ma N. Welding deformation and residual stress prevention. Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zolpakar NA, Lodhi SS, Pathak S, et al. Application of multi-objective genetic algorithm (Moga) optimization in machining processes. In: Optimization of manufacturing processes. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 185–199.
   Google Scholar
• Coello CAC, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS. Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2004;8(3):256–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira FGDC. Estudo comparativo de modelos e técnicas para otimização de portfólios com restrição de cardinalidade [Master’s Thesis]. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais; 2018. p. 262–301. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi R. Otimização escalar e vetorial. Notas de aula; 2007; [cited 2020 May 05]. p. 309. Portuguese. Available from: http://150.164.25.15/taka/Download/OTEV-Vol2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg DE, Holland JH. Genetic algorithms and machine learning; Machine Learn. 1988;3:95–99.
   Google Scholar
• Ticona WGC, Delb´em ACB. Algoritmos evolutivos para otimizac¸˜ao multio-bjetivo; 2008. (Relat´orio t´ecnico. Notas Did´aticas do ICMC-USP, 76), São Carlos, Brazil. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Coello CACC, Pulido GT. A micro-genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization; Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2001. p. 126–140.
   Google Scholar
• Deb K, Thiele L, Laumanns M, et al. Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems. Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation; vol. 1; Honolulu, HI: IEEE; 2002. p. 825–830.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, J. Multiple Objective Optimization with Vector Evaluated Genetic Algorithms. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Ed. G.J.E Grefensette, J.J. Lawrence Erlbraum; 1985. p. 93-100.
   Google Scholar
• Pratap D, Agarwal AS, Meyarivan TAM. A fast and elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGAII. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2002;6(2):182–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sastry K, Goldberg D, Kendall G. Genetic algorithms. In: Burke E.K., Kendall G. (eds) Search methodologies. Boston (MA): Springer; 2005. p. 97–125.
   Google Scholar
• Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evol Comput. 2000;8(2):173–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas N, Deb K. Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol Comput. 1994;2(3):221–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa AM, Ribeiro L, Arantes J. Algoritmo gen´etico multiobjetivo: sistema adaptativo com elitismo. Citado. 2010;2:16. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Hong JK, Tsai CL, Dong P. Assessment of numerical procedures for residual stress analysis of multipass welds. Weld J N Y. 1998;77:372–s.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu A, Syngellakis S, Mellor BG. Finite element prediction of residual stresses in a fillet welded T-joint. 6th International Conference on Trends in Welding Research; 2003. p. 832–837. Phoenix, Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Zaeem MA, Nami MR, Kadivar MH. Prediction of welding buckling distortion in a thin wall aluminum T joint. Comput Mater Sci. 2007;38(4):588–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verde S, Análise Numérica e experimental de Tensões e Deformações Residuais em Junta 322 T com Soldas de Filete [Dissertação (Mestrado)]. Universidade Federal da Bahia; 2014 [cited 2020 May 10]. p. 138. Portuguese. Available from: https://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/bitstream/ri/16241/1/SVERDE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sun JS, Wu CS. Effects of welding heat input on microstructure and hardness in heat-affected zone of HQ130 steel. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng. 2001;9(1):25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lostado LR, Corral BM, Martínez CMA, et al. Residual stresses with time-independent cyclic plasticity in finite element analysis of welded joints. Metals. 2017;7(4):136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun JS, Wu CS. Effects of welding heat input on microstructure and hardness in heat-affected zone of HQ130 steel. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng. 2000;9:25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar