34,653
Views
64
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Japan and identity change: why it matters in International Relations

References

  • Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y. M., Johnston, A. I. and McDermott R. (2006) ‘Identity as a variable’, Perspectives on Politics 4(4): 695–711.
  • Abizadeh, A. (2005) ‘Does collective identity presuppose an other? On the alleged incoherence of global solidarity’, American Political Science Review 99(1): 45–60.
  • Adler, E. (2002) ‘Constructivism and international relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. Simmons (eds) Handbook of International Relations, New Delhi: SAGE, pp. 95–118.
  • Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.
  • Ashizawa, K. (2008) ‘When identity matters: state identity, regional institution-building, and Japanese foreign policy’, International Studies Review 10(3): 571–98.
  • Baldwin, D. A. (2013) [2002] ‘Power and international relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. Simmons (eds) Handbook of International Relations, New Delhi: SAGE, pp. 273–97.
  • Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. (2005) ‘Power in international politics’, International Organization 59(1): 39–75.
  • Befu, H. (2001) Hegemony of Homogeneity: An Anthropological Analysis of Nihonjinron, Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
  • Berenskoetter, F. (2010) ‘Identity in international relations’, in R. Denemark (ed) The International Studies Encyclopaedia, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Berger, T. U. (1993) ‘From sword to chrysanthemum: Japan's culture of anti-militarism’, International Security 17(4): 119–50.
  • Berger, T. U. (1996) ‘Norms, identity, and national security in Germany and Japan’, in P.J. Katzenstein (ed) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identities in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 317–56.
  • Berger, T. U. (1998) Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Billig, M. (1995) Banal Nationalism, London: SAGE.
  • Bleiker, R. and Hutchison, E. (2008) ‘Fear no more: emotions and world politics’, Review of International Studies 34(1): 115–35.
  • Brubaker, R. and Cooper, F. (2000) ‘Beyond “identity”’, Theory and Society 29(1): 1–47.
  • Bukh, A. (2009) ‘Identity, foreign policy and the “Other”: Japan's “Russia”’, European Journal of International Relations 15(2): 319–45.
  • Bukh, A. (2010) Japan's National Identity and Foreign Policy: Russia as Japan's ‘Other’, London: Routledge.
  • Cabinet Office (1947) The Constitution of Japan, accessed at http://www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/constitution_and_government/frame_01.html, 30 October 2014.
  • Calder, K. (1988) ‘Japanese foreign economic policy formation: explaining the reactive state’, World Politics 40(4): 517–41.
  • Calder, K. (2003) ‘Japan as a post-reactive state?’, Orbis 47(4): 605–16.
  • Campbell, D. (1994) ‘Policy and identity: Japanese Other/American Self’, in N. Inayatullah, S. J. Rosow and M. Rupert (eds) The Global Economy as Political Space: A Crucial Reader in International Political Economy, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 147–69.
  • Campbell, D. (1998) [1992] Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Catalinac, A. L. (2007) ‘Identity theory and foreign policy: explaining Japan's responses to the 1991 Gulf War and the 2003 US War in Iraq’, Politics & Policy 35(1): 58–100.
  • Chafetz, G., Spirtas, M. and Frankel, B. (1998) ‘Introduction: tracing the influence of identity on foreign policy’, Security Studies 8(2–3): 7–22.
  • Connolly, W. E. (1991) Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Crawford, N. C. (2000) ‘The passion of world politics: propositions on emotion and emotional relationships’, International Security 24(4): 116–56.
  • Dale, P. N. (1986) The Myth of Japanese Uniqueness, London: Routledge.
  • Digeser, P. (1992) ‘Fourth face of power’, Journal of Politics 54(4): 977–1007.
  • Doty, R. L. (1993) ‘Foreign policy as social construction: a post-positivist analysis of US counterinsurgency in the Philippines’, International Studies Quarterly 37(3): 297–320.
  • Doty, R. L. (1997) ‘Aporia: a critical exploration of the agent-structure problematique in International Relations theory’, European Journal of International Relations 3(3): 365–92.
  • Doty, R. L. (2000) ‘A reply to Colin Wight’, European Journal of International Relations 5(3): 387–90.
  • Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization 52(4): 887–917.
  • Friman, R. H., Katzenstein, P. J., Leheny, D. and Okawara, N. (2006) ‘Immovable object? Japan's security policy in East Asia’, in P. J. Katzenstein and T. Shiraishi (eds) Beyond Japan: The Dynamics of East Asian Regionalism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 85–107.
  • Funabashi, Y. (1991/92) ‘Japan and the new world order’, Foreign Affairs 70(5): 58–74.
  • Gries, P. H., Zhang, Q, Crowson, H. M. and Cai, H. (2011) ‘Patriotism, nationalism and China's US policy: structures and consequences of Chinese national identity’, The China Quarterly 205: 1–17.
  • Guillaume, X. (2011) International Relations and Identity: A Dialogical Approach, London: Routledge.
  • Gustafsson, K. (2011) Narratives and Bilateral Relations: Rethinking the History Issue in Sino-Japanese Relations, Ph.D. dissertation (Stockholm Studies in Politics 139), Stockholm: Stockholm University.
  • Gustafsson, K. (2014) ‘Memory politics and ontological security in Sino-Japanese relations’, Asian Studies Review 38(1): 71–86.
  • Hagström, L. (2005) ‘Relational power for foreign policy analysis: issues in Japan's China Policy’, European Journal of International Relations 11(3): 395–430.
  • Hagström, L. (2010) ‘The democratic party of Japan's security policy and Japanese politics of constitutional revision: a cloud over Article 9? Australian Journal of International Affairs 64(5): 510–25.
  • Hagström, L. (2012) ‘“Power shift” in East Asia? A critical reappraisal of narratives on the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands incident in 2010’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5(3): 267–97.
  • Hagström, L. and Hanssen, U. (2013) ‘What “peace” enables: from ‘normalisation’ of Sino-Japanese relations to the ‘normalisation’ of Japanese foreign and security policy?’, Paper Presented at the Workshop ‘The Rise and Demise of Asian World Supremacy: Power, Effects and Identities’, Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Stockholm; 28–29 August.
  • Hagström, L. (2014) ‘The “abnormal” state: identity, norm/exception and Japan’, European Journal of International Relations. doi:10.1177/1354066113518356.
  • Hall, M. (2006) ‘The fantasy of realism, or mythology as methodology’, in D. H. Nexon and I. B. Neumann (eds) Harry Potter and International Relations, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 177–93.
  • Heer, H. and Wodak, R. (2008) ‘Introduction: collective memory, national narratives and the politics of the past, the discursive construction of history’, in H. Heer, W. Manoschek, A. Pollak and R. Wodak (eds) The Discursive Construction of History: Remembering the Wehrmacht's War of Annihilation, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–16.
  • Holland, J. (2013) ‘Foreign policy and political possibility’, European Journal of International Relations 19(1): 49–68.
  • Hook, G. D. (1988) ‘The erosion of anti-militaristic principles in contemporary Japan’, Journal of Peace Research 25(4): 381–94.
  • Hook, G. D. (1996) Militarization and Demilitarization in Contemporary Japan, London: Routledge.
  • Hopf, T. (2002) Social Construction of International Politics: Identities & Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 & 1999, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Howarth, D. (2000) Discourse. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Howarth, D. and Stavrakakis, Y. (2000) ‘Introducing discourse theory and political analysis’, in D. Howarth, A. J. Norval and Y. Stavrakakis (eds) Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 1–23.
  • Hutchison, E. (2010) ‘Trauma and the politics of emotions: constituting identity, security and community after the Bali bombing’, International Relations 24(1): 65–86.
  • Inoguchi, T. (1991) Japan's International Relations, Oxford and San Francisco: Westview Press.
  • Jackson, P. T. (2004) ‘Hegel's House, or “People are states too”’, Review of International Studies 30(2): 281–7.
  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1996a) Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1996b) ‘Introduction: Alternative perspectives on national security’, in P. J. Katzenstein (ed) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identities in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–32.
  • Katzenstein, P. J. (2008) Rethinking Japanese Security: Internal and External Dimensions, London: Routledge.
  • Katzenstein, P. J. and Okawara, N. (1993) ‘Japan's national security: structures, norms, and policies’, International Security 17(4): 84–118.
  • Keck, M. E. and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Kennedy, P. (1994) ‘Japan: A twenty-first-century power?’, in C. C. Garby and M. Brown Bullock (eds) Japan: A New Kind of Superpower?, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 193–9.
  • Klien, S. (2002) Rethinking Japan's Identity and International Role: An Intercultural Perspective, London: Routledge.
  • Kosterman, R. and Feshbach, S. (1989) ‘Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes’, Political Psychology 10(2): 257–74.
  • Kowert, P. A. (1998) ‘National identity: inside and out’, Security Studies 8(2–3): 1–34.
  • Kowert, P. and Legro, J. (1996) ‘Norms, identity, and their limits: a theoretical reprise’, in P. J. Katzenstein (ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 451–97.
  • Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.
  • Layne, C. (1993) ‘The unipolar illusion: why new great powers will rise’, International Security 17(4): 5–51.
  • Lebow, R. N. (2008) ‘Identity and international relations’, International Relations 22(4): 473–92.
  • Littlewood, I. (1996) The Idea of Japan: Western Images, Western Myths, Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.
  • Lupovici, A. (2012) ‘Ontological dissonance, clashing identities, and Israel's unilateral steps towards the Palestinians’, Review of International Studies 38(4): 809–33.
  • Maull, H. W. (1990/91) ‘Germany and Japan: the new civilian powers’, Foreign Affairs 69(5): 91–106.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Mercer, J. (2010) ‘Emotional beliefs’, International Organization 64(1): 1–31.
  • Moravcsik, A. (1997) ‘Taking preferences seriously: a liberal theory of international politics’, International Organization 51(4): 513–53.
  • Morris-Suzuki, T. (1998) Re-inventing Japan: Time, Space, Nation, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
  • Murray, M. (2010) ‘Identity, insecurity, and great power politics: the tragedy of German naval ambition before the First World War’, Security Studies 19(4): 656–88.
  • Neumann, I. B. (1996) ‘Self and other in international relations’, European Journal of International Relations 2(2): 139–74.
  • Neumann, I. B. (2003) Mening Materialitet Makt [Meaning, Materiality, Power], Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Oe, K. (1995) Japan, the Ambiguous, and Myself: The Nobel Prize Speech and Other Lectures, Tokyo: Kodansha.
  • Oguma, E. (2002) A Genealogy of ‘Japanese’ Self-Images, Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
  • Oros, A. L. (2008) Normalizing Japan: Politics, Identity and the Evolution of Security Practice, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Pharr, S. J. (1993) ‘Japan's defensive foreign policy and the politics of burden-sharing’, in G.L. Curtis (ed) Japan's Foreign Policy After the Cold War: Coping with Change, Armonk: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 235–62.
  • Phillips, N. and Hardy, C. (2002) Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. New Delhi: SAGE.
  • Ringmar, E. (1996) Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden's Intervention in the Thirty Years War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ringmar, E. (2012) ‘Introduction: the international politics of recognition’, in T. Lindemann and E. Ringmar (eds) The International Politics of Recognition, Boulder: Paradigm, pp. 3–23.
  • Rosecrance, R. (1986) The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World, New York: Basic Books.
  • Rozman, G. (2012) ‘Introduction’, in G. Rozman (ed) East Asian National Identities: Common Roots and Chinese Exceptionalism, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–16.
  • Rumelili, B. (2004) ‘Constructing identity and relating to difference: understanding the EU's mode of differentiation’, Review of International Studies 30(1): 27–47.
  • Saurette, P. (2006) ‘You dissin me? Humiliation and post 9/11 global politics’, Review of International Studies 32(3): 495–522.
  • Schulze, K. (2013) ‘Facing the ‘rise of China’: changes in Japan's foreign policy identity’, unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department for Social Sciences/Institute of East Asian Studies, Duisburg: Duisburg-Essen University.
  • Singh, B. (2008) ‘Japan's security policy: from a peace state to an international state’, The Pacific Review 21(3): 303–25.
  • Soeya, Y (2005) Nihon no ‘midoru pawā’ gaikō [Japan's Middle Power Diplomacy], Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō.
  • Steele, B. J. (2008) Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State, London: Routledge.
  • Suzuki, S. (2005) ‘Japan's socialization into Janus-faced European international society’, European Journal of International Relations 11(1): 137–64.
  • Suzuki, S. (2007) ‘The importance of “othering” in China's national identity: Sino-Japanese relations as a stage of identity conflicts’, The Pacific Review 20(1): 23–47.
  • Suzuki, S. (2009) Civilization and Empire: China and Japan's Encounter with European International Society, London: Routledge.
  • Tamaki, T. (2010) Deconstructing Japan's Image of South Korea: Identity in Foreign Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Tanaka, S. (1993) Japan's Orient: Rendering Pasts into History, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
  • Wæver, O. (2002) ‘Identity, communities and foreign policy: discourse analysis as foreign policy theory’, in L. Hansen and O. Wæver (eds) European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic States, London: Routledge, pp. 20–49.
  • Waltz, K. N. (1979) Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Waltz, K. N. (1993) ‘The emerging structure of international politics’, International Security 18(2): 44–79.
  • Waltz, K. N. (2000) ‘Structural realism after the cold war’. International Security 25(1): 5–41.
  • Weber, C. (2010) International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction, London: Routledge.
  • Weldes, J., Laffey, M., Gusterson, H. and Duvall, R. (1999) ‘Introduction: constructing insecurity’, in J. Weldes, M. Laffey, H. Gusterson and R. Duvall (eds) Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–33.
  • Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wight, C. (1999) ‘They shoot dead horses don't they? Locating agency in the agent-structure problematique’, European Journal of International Relations 5(1): 109–42.
  • Wight, C. (2000) ‘Interpretation all the way down: a reply to Roxanne Lynn Doty’, European Journal of International Relations 6(3): 423–30.
  • Williams, M. C. (1998) ‘Identity and the politics of security’, European Journal of International Relations 4(2): 204–25.
  • Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. and Liebhart, K. (2009) [1999] The Discursive Construction of National Identity, 2nd edn, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Yoshino, K. (1992) Cultural Nationalism in Contemporary Japan, London: Routledge.