Diffusion and adaptation: why even the Silicon Valley model is adapted as it diffuses to East Asia

References

• Acharya, A. (2004) ‘How ideas spread: whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism’, International Organization 58: 239–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2009) Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amable, B. (2003) The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Au, K. and White, S. (2010) ‘Hong Kong's venture capital system and the commercialization of new technology’, in D. Fuller (ed.) Innovation Policy and the Limits of Laissez-Faire: Hong Kong's Policy in Comparative Perspective, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 145–80.
   Google Scholar
• Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2008) ‘From direct support of business sector R&D/innovation to targeting venture capital/private equity: a catching-up innovation and technology policy life cycle perspective’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 17(1–2): 153–72.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, P. and Jörgens, H. (2005) ‘The international sources of policy convergence: explaining the spread of environmental policy innovations’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(5): 860–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. (1999) ‘Norms, institutions, and national identity in contemporary Europe’, International Studies Quarterly 43: 83–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1991) ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, in P. J. DiMaggio and W. W. Powell (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P. and Marsh, D. (2000) ‘Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making’, Governance 13: 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. (2005) ‘Globalization, harmonization, and competition: the different pathways to policy convergence’, Journal of European Public Policy 12: 841–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EDB (2012) ‘Global investor programme’, accessed at http://www.edb.gov.sg/content/dam/edb/zh/why%20singapore/entering-singapore/GIPGlobal%20Investor%20Programme-Timeline.pdf, 3 August 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, Z. and Simmons, B. (2005) ‘On waves, clusters, and diffusion: a conceptual framework’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598: 33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, R. and Gupta, A. (2009) ‘The limits of regulatory convergence: globalization and Gmo politics in the South’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 9: 113–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. (2010) Innovation Policy and the Limits of Laissez-faire: Hong Kong's Policy in Comparative Perspective, New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• GIO (Government Information Office Executive Yuan, R.O.C.) (1983) Republic of China: A Reference Book. Taipei: United Pacific International Inc., pp. 96–120, 159–61, 189–93, 333–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gompers, P. and Lerner, J. (1999) The Venture Capital Cycle, Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gulinello, C. (2005) ‘Engineering a venture capital market and the effects of government control on private ordering: lessons from the Taiwan experience’, George Washington International Law Review 37(4): 845–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1993) ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25(3): 275--96.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K. and Knill, C. (2005) ‘Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(5): 775–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Trade and Industry Bureau (1998) ‘Item for finance committee: new capital account – applied research fund’, Hong Kong Industry of Industry and Trade FCR (97-98)114; accessed at http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr97-98/english/fc/fc/papers/f2703114.htm, 11 March 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, M., Han, K., and Tanaka, S. (2002) ‘Scattering geese: The venture capital industries of East Asia, a report to the World Bank’, World Bank, September 29.
   Google Scholar
• Klingler-Vidra, R. (2014a) ‘All politics is local: sources of variance in the diffusion of venture capital policies’, doctoral thesis, School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London.
   Google Scholar
• Klingler-Vidra, R. (2014b) ‘The public venture policy menu’, Venture Findings, Welcome Issue (1a): 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Klingler-Vidra, R. (2014c) ‘Building a venture capital market in Vietnam: diffusion of a neoliberal market strategy to a socialist state’, Asian Studies Review 38(4): 582–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingler-Vidra, R. and Schleifer, P. (2014) ‘Convergence more or less: why do practices vary as they diffuse?’, International Studies Review 16(2): 264–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C. (2005) ‘Introduction: cross-national policy convergence: concepts, approaches and explanatory factors’, Journal of European Public Policy 12: 764–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortum, S. and Lerner, J. (2000) ‘Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation’, RAND Journal of Economics 31(4): 674–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczynski, P. and Williamson, J. (2003) After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, p. 325.
   Google Scholar
• Lazonick, W. (2009) ‘The new economy business model and the crisis of U.S. Capitalism,’ Capitalism and Society 4(2). Available from: http://capitalism.columbia.edu/files/ccs/William%20Lazonick.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., Liefferink, D. and Veenman, S. (2005) ‘When the birds sing: a framework for analysing domestic factors behind policy convergence’, Journal of European Public Policy 12: 797–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. (2009) Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed – And What to Do About It, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D., Jordana, J. and Marin, X. F. (2011) ‘The global diffusion of regulatory agencies: channels of transfer and stages of diffusion’, Comparative Political Studies 44(10): 1343–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2013) The Entrepreneurial State, London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, R. (2009). Review of Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America by Kurt Weyland, Comparative Political Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Meseguer, C. (2006) ‘Learning and economic policy choices’, European Journal of Political Economy 22: 156–78.
   Google Scholar
• Meseguer, C. (2009) Learning, Policy Making, and Market Reforms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mims, C. (2014) ‘Humanity's last great hope: venture capitalists’, Wall Street Journal, accessed at http://online.wsj.com/articles/humanitys-last-great-hope-venture-capitalists-1413817498, 22 October 2014.
   Google Scholar
• NVCA (2011) Venture Impact: The Economic Importance of Venture Capital-Backed Companies to the U.S. Economy, Edition 6.0. Available from: http://www.nvca.org.
   Google Scholar
• Patten, C. (1998) East and West: The Last Governor of Hong Kong on Power, Freedom and the Future, London: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen, L. N. S. (2014) ‘Bounded rationality and the diffusion of modern investment treaties’, International Studies Quarterly 58(1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. (2005) ‘Diffusion without convergence: how political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment’, Journal of European Public Policy 12: 924–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R. (1991) ‘What is lesson-drawing?’ Journal of Public Policy 11: 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Shipan, C. R. and Volden, C. (2008) ‘The mechanisms of policy diffusion’, American Journal of Political Science 52: 840–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F. and Garret, G. (2008) ‘Introduction: the diffusion of liberalization’, in B. A. Simmon, F. Dobbin and G. Garret (eds) The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. and Weir, M. (1985) ‘State structures and the possibilities of Keynesian responses to the depression in Sweden, Britain and the United States’, in P. Evans et al. (eds) Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solingen, E. (2012) ‘Of dominoes and firewalls: the domestic, regional, and global politics of international diffusion’, International Studies Quarterly 56: 631–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solingen, E. and Börzel, T. A. (2014) ‘Introduction to presidential issue: the politics of international diffusion – a symposium’, International Studies Review 16(2): 173–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, D. (1991) ‘Global patterns of decolonization, 1500–1987’, International Studies Quarterly 35: 429–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storz, C. and Schafer, S. (2011) Institutional Diversity and Innovation: Continuing and Emerging Patterns in Japan and China, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swank, D. (2008) ‘Tax policy in an era of internationalization: an assessment of a conditional diffusion model of the spread of neoliberalism’, in B. A. Simmons, F. Dobbin and G. Garret (eds) The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taiwan Venture Capital Association (TVCA) (2006) ‘Venture capital as a policy tool, statistics (overview), and laws and regulations’, accessed at www.tvca.org.tw
   Google Scholar
• Volden, C., Ting, M. M. and Carpenter, D. P. (2008) ‘A formal model of learning and policy diffusion’, American Political Science Review 102(3): 319–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, R. (1990) Governing the Market: Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, A. and Zhang, X. (2012) East Asian Capitalism: Diversity, Continuity and Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (1995) ‘Taiwan's venture capital: policies and impacts’, Journal of Industry Studies 2(1): 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2005) ‘The diffusion of innovations: how cognitive heuristics shaped Bolivia's pension reform’, Comparative Politics 38(1): 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2006) Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2010) ‘The diffusion of regime contention in European democratization, 1830–1940’, Comparative Political Studies 43(8/9): 1148–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2012) ‘Diffusion waves in European democratization: the impact of organizational development’, Comparative Politics 45(1): 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitely, R. (1992) Business Systems in East Asia, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, M. A. and Redding, G. (2013) The Oxford Handbook of Asian Business Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, Y. and Painter, M. (2011) ‘Diffusion, transmutation, and regulatory regime in socialist market economies: telecoms reform in China and Vietnam’, The Pacific Review 24(4): 375–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar