United States democracy assistance in Malaysia: the nature and impact of concurrent strategy

References

• Ahmad, A. (2016, January 6). Honorary secretary of the Malaysians for free and fair elections (MAFREL), Interviewed by Muhamad Takiyuddin Ismail [Tape recording]. Kuala Lumpur.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, R. (2012, February 28). Usaha gulingkan pemerintahan BN? [Effort to topple BN ruling?] Utusan Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Alagappa, M. (1994). Democratic transition in Asia: The role of the international community (Special Report No. 3). Hawaii: East-West Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Alagappa, M. (2017, February 25). A general election is not the only avenue to bring about political change in a democracy. The Edge Markets. Retrieved from http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/my-say-general-election-not-only-avenue-bring-about-political-change-democracy
   Google Scholar
• Auslin, M. R. (2017). US-Japan Approaches to democracy promotion. In M.R Auslin & D. E. Bob (Eds.), U.S-Japan approaches to democracy promotion (pp. 1–8). Washington: Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bahari, A. (1989). Trades union congress (MTUC) 1949-81: A study of a national labour centre (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Warwick. Retrieved from http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/34818
   Google Scholar
• Bardall, G. (2016). Books reviews: The taming of democracy assistance. Democratization, 24(4),770–772. doi:10.1080/13510347.2016.1171318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermeo. N. (2010). Democracy assistance and the search for security. In P. Burnell & R. Youngs (Eds.), New challenges to democratization (pp.73–92). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bermeo, S. B. (2011). Foreign aid and regime change: A role for donor intent. World Development, 39, 2021–2031. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N., & Storm, L. (2010). Problems of party assistance in hybrid regimes: The case of Morocco. Democratization, 17(6),1202–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchet, N. (2015). Democracy promotion as US foreign policy: Bill Clinton and democratic enlargement (p. 126). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, V. (2007). Democracy and security: Process versus outcome in assistance policy? Democratization, 14, 193–206.
   Google Scholar
• Bowie, N. (2012, December 30). Dubious Backers of Regime Change. New Straits Times.
   Google Scholar
• Burnell, P. (2000). Democracy assistance: Origins and organizations. In P. Burnell (Ed.), Democracy assistance: International cooperation for democratization (pp. 34–66). London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, S. (2015). The taming of democracy assistance: Why democracy promotion does not confront dictators. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Carapico, S. (2002). Foreign Aid for promoting democracy in the Arab World. Middle East Journal, 56(3), 379–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. (1995). Democracy promotion under Clinton. Washington Quarterly, 18(4), 13–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. (1999). Aiding democracy abroad: The learning Curve. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. (2000). Struggling with semi-authoritarians. In P. Burnel (Ed.), Democracy assistance: International cooperation for democratization (pp. 210–226). London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. (2002). The end of transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. (2008, August 19). Five myths about western political party aid in the Arab world. Retrieved from http://carnegieendowment.org/sada/?fa=20936
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. (2011, April 6). Political party aid: Change, challenges and possible principles. Paper presented at Joint International IDEA-GOVNET seminar on trends in accountability, Political Party Assistance. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T., & Brechenmacher, S. (2014). Closing space: Democracy and human rights support under fire. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Case, W. F. (2000). The new Malaysian nationalism: Infirm beginnings, crashing Finale. Asian Ethnicity, 1, 131–147.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, M. (2016, November 12). Tunku Aziz says US activists only want regime change. Free Malaysia Today. Retrieved from http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2016/11/12/tunku-aziz-says-us-activists-only-want-regime-change/
   Google Scholar
• Cheng-Cwee, K. (2013). Malaysia’s US policy under Najib: Structural and domestic sources of a small state’s strategy. Asian Security, 9, 143–164.
   Google Scholar
• Chinnasamy, S. (2017). New media political engagement and participation in Malaysia. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1992). Deterring democracy. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• CIPE. (2013). Annual report. Washington: Centre for International Private Enterprise.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, A. (2013). Institutional impediments and reluctant actors: The limited role of democracy aid in democratic development (Göteborg Studies in Politics 132). University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. (2013). Fighting for freedom: Promoting democracy the American Way. Harvard International Review, 34,36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M., Lynch, T. J., & Bouchet, N. (2013). Introduction: Presidents, American democracy promotion and world order. In M. Cox, T. J. Lynch, & N. Bouchet (Eds.), US foreign policy and democracy promotion: From Theodore Roosevelt to Barack Obama (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dalacoura, K. (2005). US democracy promotion in the Arab Middle East since 11 September: A critique. International Affairs, 81, 963–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon, K. S. (2009). Malaysian foreign policy in the Mahathir era, 1981–2003: Dilemmas of development. Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (1995). Promoting democracy in the 1990s: Actors and instruments, issues and imperatives. Washington: Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2017). The global context for promoting democracy. In M. R Auslin & D. E. Bob (Eds.), U.S-Japan approaches to democracy promotion (pp. 9–24). Washington: Sasakawa Peace Foundation USAx.
   Google Scholar
• Dosch, J. (2009). The US and Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia (pp. 220–233). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Edsall, T. (2005, April 17). Think Tank's ideas shifted as Malaysia ties grew. The Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• Embong, A. R. (2001). Beyond the crisis: The paradox of the Malaysian middle class. In A. R. Embong (Ed.), Southeast Asian middle classes: Prospects for social change and democratisation (pp. 80–102). Bangi: Penerbit UKM.
   Google Scholar
• Erdmann, G. (2005). Hesitant bedfellows: The German Stiftungen and party aid in Africa. An attempt at an assessment (Working paper 184). Warwick: University of Warwick Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E., Perez-Linan, A., & Seligson, M. A. (2007). The effects of U.S foreign assistance on democracy building 1990–2003. World Politics, 59, 404–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2006). After the neocons: America at the crossroads. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F., & McFaul, M. (2007). Should democracy be promoted or demoted? The Stanley Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gershman, C., & Allen, M. (1996). The assault on democracy assistance. Journal of Democracy, 17, 36–51.
   Google Scholar
• Gills, B., & Rocamora, J. (1992). Low intensity of democracy. Third world Quarterly, 13, 501–523.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, A. A. (2001). Foreign aid and statehood in Africa. International Organization, 55, 123–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green. M. (2015, November 19). Democratic transitions in Southeast Asia. Congressional Testimony to Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Heckelman, J. C., & Knack, S. (2005). Foreign Aid and Market-Liberalizing Reform (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3557). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=708421
   Google Scholar
• Hershman, M. (May 22, 2012). The Malaysian third way: A public-private partnership. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesasia/2012/05/22/the-malaysian-third-way-a-public-private-partnership/#559814b829f1
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, L. C. R. (2010). Democracy assistance in Asia and the role of China. International Journal: Canada’ Journal of Global Policy Analysis,65, 596.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, D. (2015). Democracy promotion and foreign policy identity and interests in US, EU and non-western democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, J. G. (2004). The end of the neo-conservative moment. Survival, 46, 7–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyvitis, S., & Vlachaki, I. (2009). Democratic aid and the democratization of recipients. Contemporary Economic Policy, 28, 188–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, C. (2006). What Is effective aid? How would donors allocate it? (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 4005).
   Google Scholar
• Knack, S. (2004). Does foreign aid promote democracy. International Studies Quarterly, 48, 251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauthammer, C. (1991). The unipolar moment. Foreign Affairs, 70, 23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, K. (2015, November 22). Civil society, free press important for country to thrive, Obama tells Najib. The Malay Mail Online. Retrieved from http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/civil-society-free-pressimportant-for-country-to-thrive-obama-tells-najib#VEOYl8gBZsY713rA.99
   Google Scholar
• Kurlantzick, J. (2015). The pivot in Southeast Asia: Balancing interests and values. New York: Centre for Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malaysia close to attaining US visa waiver status. (2017, July 8). Free Malaysia Today. Retrieved from http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2017/07/08
   Google Scholar
• Mendelson, S. E. (2001). Democracy assistance and political transition in Russia: Between success and failure. International Security, 25, 68–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L. (2014). Supporting democracy abroad–United States. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FH_Demo_Reports_USA_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mohamad, M. (1999, June 19). Mahathir’s UMNO Presidential Speech at the UMNO General Assembly 1999. Utusan Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Naz Karim, F. (2012, September 21). Plot to destabilize the government. New Straits Times.
   Google Scholar
• Nesadurai, H. E. (2004). Malaysia and the United States: Rejecting dominance, embracing engagement. Singapore: NTU.
   Google Scholar
• NGO leaders to meet Obama on Sunday. (2014, April 26). Astro Awani. Retrieved from http://english.astroawani.com/malaysia-news/ngo-leaders-meet-obama-sunday-34734
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power and American foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly, 119, 255–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packenham, R. (1973). Liberal America and the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck Koon, H. (2015). ‘Malaysia and the United States: A maturing partnership’. In M. Weiss (Ed.), Routledge handbook of contemporary Malaysia. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto-Duschinsky, M. (1991). Foreign political aid: The German political foundations and their US counterparts. International Affairs, 67, 33–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quayle, L. (2013). National and regional obligations, the metaphor of two‐level games, and the ASEAN socio-cultural community. Asian Politics & Policy, 5, 499–521.
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, K. F. (2000). Democracy assistance in Southeast Asia: Long history/unfinished business. In P. Burnell (Ed.), Democracy assistance: International co-operation for democratization (pp. 263–287). London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Rakner, L., Menocal, A. R., & Fritz, V. (2008). Assessing international democracy assistance: Key lessons and challenges. London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rinehart, I. E. (2015). Malaysia: Background and U.S. relations. Washington: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. I. (1996). Promoting polyarchy: Globalization, US intervention, and hegemony. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russel, D. R. (2015). U.S. policy priorities for the East Asian and Pacific region in 2015. Retrieved from http://malaysia.usembassy.gov/news_eaprussel-020415.html
   Google Scholar
• Saravanamuttu, J. (2010). Malaysia's foreign policy: The first fifty years: Alignment, neutralism, Islamism. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Santiso, C. (2001). International co-operation for democracy and good governance: Moving toward a second generation? European Journal of Developmental Research, 13, 154–180.
   Google Scholar
• Schier, P. (2006, December 1). Interview by the sun: Sharing universal values. The Sun.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. M., & Steele, C. A. (2005). The nature and impact of democracy support by the United States National Endowment for Democracy, 1990–99. Democratization, 12, 439–460.
   Google Scholar
• Sedaca, N. B., & Bouchet, N. (2014). Holding steady? US democracy promotion in a changing world Americas. (PP2014/01). Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Shahrudin, H. S. (2017, June 28). Malaysia upgraded to Tier 2 in latest US State Dept Trafficking in Persons Report. New Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2017/06/252663/malaysia-upgraded-tier-2-latest-us-state-dept-trafficking-persons-report
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S. W. (2015). The US rebalance and Southeast Asia. Asian Survey, 55, 572–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. L. (2000). Strategic centrality: Indonesia’s changing role in ASEAN. Singapore: ISEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Sodhy, P. (1988). The American constitution: Its impact on Malaysia. In J. B. Starr (Ed.), The United States Constitution: Its birth, growth, and influence in Asia (pp.169–192). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sodhy. P. (2012). Malaysia-US Relations 2000-2011. Kuala Lumpur: Institute of Strategic and International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Stahn, A., & van Hüllen, V. (2007, May 17–19). Different actors, different tools? Approaching EU and US democracy promotion in the Mediterranean and the Newly Independent States. Paper presented at the European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Tenth Biennial International Conference, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Su-Lyn, B. (2016, March 30). Malaysian transgender activist wins US government award for courage. The Malay Mail Online. Retrieved from http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/malaysian-transgender-activist-wins-us-government-award-forcourage#vD27VrrlAsKFEqQF.97
   Google Scholar
• Soros outfit denies funding overthrow of Malaysian government. (2016, November 2). The Malay Mail Online. Retrieved from http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/soros-outfit-denies-funding-overthrow-of-malaysian-government#4FGCMyvcm052mBlb.99
   Google Scholar
• Sreenevasan. A. (2016, December 9). Bersih foreign funding probe selective and baseless. Malaysiakini. Retrieved from https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/365673
   Google Scholar
• Svåsand, L. (2014). International party assistance: What we do know about the effects. Rapport 2014:03. Stockholm: Expertgruppen for bistandanalys (EBA).
   Google Scholar
• Tanapura, S. (1988, July 28). AFL-CIO dirty operation exposed. Executive Intelligence Review 15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wan Hassan, W. S., & Peters, D. (2005). Malaysia-United States Relations in the 1990s: Rhetoric and realities. Jurnal Kinabalu, 11, 155–156.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. (2009). How foreign aid can foster democratization in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 552–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yacoubian, M. (2007). Engaging Islamists and promoting democracy (Special Report 190). Washington: United States Institute of Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Ying Hooi, K. (2014). Human rights advocacy in Malaysia: The case of the Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM). Malaysian Journal of International Relations,2, 141.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, R. (2010). How to revitalize democracy assistance: Recipients’ views (Working Paper 100). Madrid: FRIDE.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, R. (2015). Rethinking civil society and support for democracy (EBA Reports 01/2015). Stockholm: Expert Group for Aid Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, R. (2016). Roundtable review of “the taming of democracy assistance”. Retrieved from http://carnegieendowment.org/2016/07/25/roundtable-review-of-taming-of-democracy-assistance-pub-64226
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. (1997). The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76, 22–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurairi A. R. (2014, November 23). 10 things about Justice for Sisters, defenders of transgenders. The Malay Mail Online. Retrieved from http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/10-things-about-justice-for-sisters-defenders-of-transgenders
   Google Scholar