Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Pacific Review Volume 31, 2018 - Issue 6: Hybrid Warfare in Asia
Submit an article Journal homepage
3,492
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

When strategy is ‘hybrid’ and not ‘grey’: reviewing Chinese military and constabulary coercion at sea

Alessio PatalanoReader in East Asian Warfare and Security, Department of War Studies, King’s College London, London, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 811-839 | Received 23 Feb 2018, Accepted 15 Aug 2018, Published online: 09 Jan 2019

ReferencesOfficial Publications

  • Academy of Military Science. (2013). The science of military strategy. Beijing: Military Science Press.
  • Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2012, September 26). Diaoyu Dao, An Inherent Territory of China. Beijing.
  • Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2014, December 7). Position paper of the government of the People’s Republic of China on the matter of jurisdiction in the South China Sea arbitration initiated by the Republic of the Philippines. Beijing.
  • Clapper, J. (2016, March 8). Letter to Sen. John McCain on Chinese reclamation and militarization of its disputed holdings in the South China Sea. Retrieved from USNI
  • Department of Defense (DOD). (2010). Quadriennal defense review report. Washington, DC.
  • Department of Defense(DOD). (2015). The Asia-Pacific maritime security strategy: Achieving U.S. national security objectives in a changing environment. Washington, DC.
  • Department of Defense. (2017) Annual report to Congress. Washington, DC.
  • Hu, J. (2012, November 17). Full text of Hu Jintao’s report at the 18th Party Congress. Xinhua.
  • Japan Ministry of Defence. (2010, December 17). National defense program guidelines for FY 2011 and Beyond. Tokyo.
  • Japan Ministry of Defence. (2013, December 17). National defense program guidelines for FY 2014 and Beyond. Tokyo.
  • Japan Ministry of Defence. (2014). Defense of Japan. Tokyo.
  • Ministry of National Defence. (2014). White paper 2014. Beijing.
  • Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI). (2015). The PLA Navy: New capabilities and missions for the 21st century. Washington, DC.
  • People’s Republic of China(PRC). (1992, February 25). Law of the People’s Republic of China on the territorial sea and contiguous zone. Beijing.
  • Permanent Court of Arbitration. (2016, July 12). Award by the International Arbitral Tribunal in the matter of the South China Sea arbitration between the Republic of the Philippines and the People’s Republic of China (PCA Case No 2013-19).
  • The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China, Ministry of National Defence. (CMoD 2015, May 26). China’s military strategy. China Daily.

Newspaper and Professional Articles

  • Akita, H. (2014, June 10). The truth about military aircraft encounters in East China Sea. Nikkei Asian Review.
  • Campbell, C. (2015, June 1). Highlights from China’s new defense white paper, ‘China’s military strategy’. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Issue Brief.
  • Chen, J., & Glaser, B. (2015, November 5). What China’s ‘Militarization’ of the South China Sea Would Actually Look Like. The Diplomat.
  • Chinese Ministry of Defence. (2014, September 11). China urges Japan to correct error. CMoD.
  • Chinese Ministry of Defence. (2016, January 15). Defense ministry responds to Japan’s provocations on Diaoyu Islands. CMoD.
  • Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2012, September 13). Foreign ministry spokesperson Hong Lei’s regular press conference on September 12, 2012. CMFA.
  • Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2012, September 14). Remarks by assistant foreign minister Le Yucheng at the symposium on the issue of Diaoyu Dao. CMFA.
  • Chiu, J. (2016, March 8). China’s secret weapon on disputed island: Beer and badminton. Foreign Policy.
  • Cohen, J. (2016, April 20). Forecasting the aftermath of a ruling on China’s nine-dash line. Foreign Policy.
  • Cooper, H. (2016, March 30). Patrolling disputed waters, U.S. and China jockey for dominance. The New York Times.
  • Erickson, A. S., & Kennedy, C. M. (2015a, May 6). Tanmen Militia: China’s ‘Maritime Rights Protection’ Vanguard. The National Interest 2015.
  • Erickson, A. S., & Kennedy, C. M. (2015b, March 31). Meet the Chinese maritime militia waging a ‘People’s War at Sea’. The Wall Street Journal.
  • Erickson, A. S., & Kennedy, C. M. (2015c, November 2). Irregular forces at sea: Not ‘merely fishermen’ – shedding light on China’s maritime militia. CIMSEC.
  • Erickson, A. S., & Kennedy, C. M. (2015, November 5). China’s daring vanguard: Introducing Sanya City’s maritime militia. CIMSEC.
  • Gady, F.-St. (2015, July 30). How China is expanding its coast guard. The Diplomat.
  • Haddick, R. (2012, August 3). Salami slicing in the South China Sea: China’s slow, patient approach to dominating Asia. Foreign Policy.
  • Hong, N. (2015, April 1). China’s maritime law enforcement reform and its implication on the regional maritime disputes. Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative.
  • Johnson, J. (2017, April 7). Fighter jet spotted on South China Sea Island, more believed in hangars: U.S. think tank. The Japan Times.
  • Kofman, M. (2016, April 10). Russian hybrid warfare and other dark arts. War on the Rocks.
  • Kraska, J., & Wilson, B. (2009, March 12). China wages maritime lawfare. Foreign Policy.
  • Kyodo. (2013, March 18). Chinese officials admit to MSDF radar lock allegations. The Japan Times.
  • Martinson, R. D. (2016, January 11). Deciphering China’s armed intrusion near the Senkaku Islands. The Diplomat.
  • Martinson, R. D. (2015, July 3). East Asian security in the age of the Chinese mega-cutter. CIMSEC.
  • Raska, M. (2015, December 18). China and the ‘three warfares’. The Diplomat.
  • Rose, A., & Brunnstrom, D. (2015, October 9). China warns U.S. it will not allow violations of its waters. Reuters.
  • Sadakat, K. (2017, July 31). What have they got against the ECJ? LRB Blog.
  • Schadlow, N. (2015, April 2). The problem with hybrid warfare. War on the Rocks.
  • Stander, C. (2017, May 29). A brief history of U.S. freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea. US Naval Institute News.
  • Thayer, C. (2017, December 17). USS cowpens incident reveals strategic mistrust between U.S. and China. The Diplomat.
  • Tisdall, S. (2016, May 16). Little blue men: The maritime militias pushing China’s claims. The Guardian.
  • Townshend, A. (2016, March 1). The strategic significance of China’s Woody Island power play. The Interpreter.
  • Van Puyvelde, D. (2015, May 7). Hybrid war – does it even exist? NATO Review.
  • Wanklyn, A. (2015, December 16). Chinese sub targeted U.S. carrier, report says. The Japan Times.
  • Wei, X. (2016, March 6). South China Sea economic cooperation zone proposed. China Daily.
  • Wong, C. (2017, March 7). First cruises, now flights… China plan to fly tourists to disputed South China Sea Islands. South China Morning Post.
  • Zhou, L. (2016, February 28). China’s military is prepared ‘to defend sovereignty’ in South China Sea: Military chief. South China Morning Post.
  • Another piece of the puzzle. (AMTI 2016, February 22). Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative.
  • Build it and they will come. (2016, August 1). Asia maritime transparency initiative.
  • China dismisses pentagon report on freedom of navigation. (2016, April 27). Xinhua.
  • China firm in its resolve to build sea power. (2014, August 27). People’s Daily.
  • China focus: ‘Be ready to win wars’, China’s xi orders reshaped PLA. (2017, August 2). Xinhua.
  • China warns Japan against ‘provocation’ around disputed islets. (2016, January 13). Reuters.
  • China’s continuing reclamation in the paracels. (2017, August 9). Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative.
  • China showcases jet fighters at South China Sea Island. (2017, December 1). Global Times.
  • Chinese navy holds live ammunition drills in Bohai, Yellow Sea. (2017, August 7). People’s Daily.
  • Commentary: U.S.-called freedom of navigation is hegemonism in disguise. (2015, November 19). Xinhua.
  • Defence Ministry’s regular press conference on Mar.31. (2016, March 31). Chinese Ministry of Defence (CMoD).
  • Defense Ministry: U.S. provocations in South China Sea is root cause of regional tension. (2016, March 7). China Military Online.
  • First cinema opens on South China Sea Island. (2017, July 23). People’s Daily.
  • Hu Jintao tells China navy: Prepare for warfare. (2011, December 7). BBC News.
  • Japan sends China warning over incursions near disputed isles. (2016, January 12). Reuters.
  • Japan spots cannon-like equipment on Chinese ship near disputed isles. (2015, December 22). Agence France Press.
  • Limited defense facilities on Nansha Islands have nothing to do with militarization: FM. (2016, February 17). People’s Daily.
  • Navy official: China training for ‘short sharp war’ with Japan. (2014, February 18). US Naval Institute News.
  • Xi behind coercive tactics in East China Sea: Documents. (2017, December 2). The Japan Times.
  • Xi calls for ‘strong, modern’ navy. (2017, May 24). Xinhua.

Secondary Literature

  • Booth, K. (1977). Navies and foreign policy. London: Croom Helm.
  • Bull, H. (1980). The new environment: Sea power and political influence. In J. Alford (Ed.), Sea power and influence: Old issues and new challenges (pp. 1–9). London: Gower and Allanheld, Osmun for IISS.
  • Buzan, B. (1978). A sea of troubles? Sources of disputes in the new ocean regime (The Adelphi Papers No. 143). London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.
  • Cable, J. (1999). Gunboat diplomacy 1919-1979: Political applications of limited naval force (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Cheng, D. (2012, May 18). Winning without fighting: Chinese legal warfare. The Heritage Foundation.
  • Cole, B. D. (2010). The great wall at sea: China’s navy in the twenty-first century. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
  • Cronin, P. M., Ratner, E., Elbridge, C., Hosford, Z., & Sullivan, A. (2014) Tailored coercion: Competition and risk in maritime Asia. Washington, DC: Center for New American Security.
  • Drifte, R. (2013). The Senkaku/Diaoyu Island territorial dispute between Japan and China: Between the materialisation of the ‘China threat’ and Japan ‘reversing the outcome of World War II’?, UNISCI Discussion Papers, 32, 9–62.
  • Dutton, P. A., & Martinson, R. D. (Eds.). (2017). China’s evolving surface fleet (China Maritime Studies No. 14). Naval War College, RI: Naval War College Press.
  • Erickson, A. S. (2016). China’s blueprint for sea power. China Brief, 16(11), 3–7.
  • Erickson, A. S., & Kennedy, C. M. (2016, March 7). China’s maritime militia. Arlington, VA: Centre for Naval Analysis.
  • Fanell, J. E. (2016). The ‘New Spratly Islands’: China’s words and actions in the South China Sea. Military Power Review (1), 27–38.
  • Fravel, T. M. (2002). The evolution of China’s military strategy: Comparing the 1987 and 1999 editions of Zhanlüexue. In J. Mulvenon & D. Finkelstein (Eds.), China’s revolution in doctrinal affairs: Emerging trends in the operational art of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (pp. 79–99). Washington, DC: Chinese People’s Liberation Army.
  • Fravel, T. M. (2008). Strong borders, secure nation: Cooperation and conflict in China’s territorial disputes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Fravel, T. M. (2015). China’s new military strategy: ‘Winning informationized local wars’. China Brief, 15(13), 3–7.
  • Fravel, T. M., & Liebman, A. (2011). Beyond the moat: The PLAN’s evolving interests and potential influence. In P. C. Saunders, C. D. Yung, M. Swaine, & A. N. Yang (Eds.), The Chinese navy: Expanding capabilities, evolving roles (41–80). Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
  • Galeotti, M. (2016). Hybrid, ambiguous, and non-linear? How new is Russia’s new way of war? Small Wars & Insurgencies, 27(2), 282–301.
  • Gray, C. S. (1992). The leverage of seapower: The strategic advantage of navies in war. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Green, M. J., Hicks, K., Cooper, Z., Schaus J., & Douglas, J. (2017) Countering coercion in maritime Asia: The theory and practice of gray zone deterrence. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
  • Halper, S. (2013). China: Three warfares. Washington, DC: Office of Net Assessment.
  • Hill, R. (1986). Maritime strategy for medium powers. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
  • Hoffman, F. G. (2016). The contemporary spectrum of conflict: Protracted, gray zone, ambiguous, and hybrid modes of war. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
  • Hribernik, M. (2015). The Japan coast guard as a foreign policy instrument in Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Bulletin, 331, 1–2.
  • International Crisis Group. (2016, June 30). East China Sea: Preventing clashed from becoming crises (Asia Report N. 280). Brussels: International Crisis Group.
  • International Institute for Strategic Studies (2013). The military balance 2013. Abingdon, OX: Routledge for IISS.
  • Jackson, L. (2015). Revisions of reality: The three warfares – China’s new way of war. The Integrative Initiative. Available at https://www.integrityinitiative.net/sites/default/files/articles/pdf/2016-07/china-three-warfares.pdf, accessed on 14 Sept 2018.
  • Jacobs, B. J. (2014). China’s frail historical claims to the South China and East China seas. AEI Research. American Enterprise Institute: Washington, DC.
  • Kania, E. B. (2016). The PLA’s latest strategic thinking on three warfares. China Brief, XVI(13), 10–13.
  • Kapusta, P. (2015) The gray zone. Special Warfare, 8(4), 18–25.
  • Kardon, I. B. (2015, July 28–29). China’s maritime rights and interests: Organizing to become a maritime power. Paper presented at the China as a Maritime Power Conference, Arlington, VA.
  • Kennedy, C. M., and Erickson, A. S. (2017). China’s third sea force, the People’s armed forces maritime militia: Tethered to the PLA (China Maritime Report No.1). Newport, RI: China Maritime Studies Institute, U.S. Naval War College.
  • Le Mière, C. (2011a). Policing the waves: Maritime paramilitaries in the Asia-Pacific. Survival, 53(1), 133–146.
  • Le Mière, C. (2011b). The return of gunboat diplomacy. Survival, 53(5), 53–68.
  • Le Mière, C. (2014). Maritime diplomacy in the 21st century: Drivers and challenges. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
  • Li, N. (2017). The southern theater command and China’s maritime strategy. China Brief, 17(9), 8–13.
  • Luttwak, E. N. (1974). The political uses of sea power. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Malik, M. (2013, May/June). Historical fiction: China’s South China Sea claims. World Affairs Journal, 83–90.
  • Martinson, R. D. (2015, July 28–29). From words to action: The creation of the china coast guard. Paper presented at the conference ‘China as a Maritime Power’, Arlington, VA.
  • Martinson, R. D. (2016a) Shepherds of the South Seas. Survival, 58(3), 187–212.
  • Martinson, R. D. (2016b). The 13th five-year plan: A new chapter in China’s maritime transformation. China Brief, 16(1), 14–17.
  • Martinson, R. D. (2017). The arming of China’s maritime frontier (China Maritime Report No.2). Newport, RI: China Maritime Studies Institute, U.S. Naval War College.
  • Mazarr, M. J. (2015). Mastring the gray zone: Understanding a changing era of conflict. Carlisle Barracks, PA: US Army War College Press.
  • McDevitt, M. (2016). Becoming a great ‘maritime power’: A Chinese dream. Arlington, VA: CNA.
  • Mugg, J., & Cowan, C. (2017, May 8). Comparing the navies of Russia and China. Real Clear Defense. Available at https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2017/05/08/comparing_the_navies_of_russia_and_china_111331.html, accessed on 14 sept 2018.
  • Odom, J. G. (2010). The true ‘lies’ of the impeccable incident: What really happened, who disregarded international law, and why every nation (outside of China) should be concerned. Michigan State University College of Law Journal of International Law, 18(3), 1–42.
  • Odom, J. G. (2011). A China in the bull shop? Comparing the rhetoric of a rising China with the reality of the international law of the sea. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal, 17(2), 201–251.
  • O’Rourke, R. (2017). China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
  • Parry, C. (2014). Super highway: Sea power in the 21st century. London: Elliott & Thompson Limited.
  • Patalano, A. (2014). Seapower and Sino-Japanese relations in the East China Sea. Asian Affairs, 45(1), 34–54.
  • Pugliese, G., & Insisa, A. (2017). Sino-Japanese power politics: Might, money, and minds. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Speller, I. (2014). Understanding naval warfare. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
  • Stokes, M., & Hsiao, R. (2013). The people’s liberation army general political department: Political warfare with Chinese characteristics. Arlington, VA: Project 2049 Institute.
  • Till, G. (2009). Seapower: A guide for the twenty-first century. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
  • Townshend, A., & Medcalf, R. (2016). Shifting waters: China’s new passive assertiveness in Asian maritime security. Sidney, AU: Lowy Institute for International Policy.
  • Turner, S. (1974). Missions of the U.S. navy. Naval War College Review, LI(1), 91–95 (reprinted in 1998).
  • Votel, J. L., Cleveland, C., Connett, C. L., & Irwin, W. (2016). Unconventional warfare in the gray zone. Joint Forces Quarterly, 80(1), 101–109.
  • Widen, J. J. (2011). Naval diplomacy – a theoretical approach. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 22(4), 715–733.
  • Wylie, J. C. (1967). Military strategy: A general theory of power control. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
  • Yoon, S. (2014). Xi Jiping’s ‘true maritime power’ and ESCS Issues. Chinese Journal of International Law, 13(4), 887–889.
  • Yoon, S. (2015). Implications of Xi Jinping’s ‘true maritime power’: Its context, significance and impact on the region. Naval War College Review, 68(3), 40–63.
  • Yung, C. D., & McNulty, P. (2015). An empirical analysis of claimant tactics in the South China Sea. Strategic Forum 289, 1–12.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.