6,663
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

ASEAN sceptics versus ASEAN proponents: evaluating regional institutions

References

  • Abdulgani, R. H. (1964). Bandung spirit: Moving on the tide of history. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Prapantja.
  • Abdullah, A.B. (2005). Prime Minister’s Message. New Straits Times (Malaysia), August 8, p.2.
  • Abdullah, A. B. (2006). Forging a United, Resilient and Integrated ASEAN: Address by the Honourable Dato’ Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Prime Minister of Malaysia at the opening of the 39th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting, Kuala Lumpur, 25 July. http://asean.org/?static_post=address-by-the-honourable-dato-seri-abdullah-ahmad-badawiprime-minister-of-malaysia-at-the-opening-of-the-39th-asean-ministerial-meeting-kuala-lumpur25-july-2006-2http:www.aseansec.org/18555.htm
  • Acharya, A. (1997). Ideas, identity and institution-building: From the “ASEAN Way” to the “Asia-Pacific Way”?. The Pacific Review, 10(3), 319–346. doi: 10.1080/09512749708719226
  • Acharya, A. (2007). ASEAN at 40: Mid-life rejuvenation? Foreign Affairs, August 15. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2007-08-15/asean-40-mid-life-rejuvenation
  • Acharya, A. (2009a). Arguing about ASEAN: What do we disagree about? Cambridge Journal of International Affairs, 22(3), 493–499. doi: 10.1080/09557570903138444
  • Acharya, A. (2009b). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Acharya, A. (2011). Asian regional institutions and the possibilities for socializing the behavior of states. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 82, June. https://think-asia.org/bitstream/handle/11540/2023/wp82-acharya-asian-regionalinstitutions.pdf?sequence=1
  • Acharya, A. (2012). The making of Southeast Asia: International relations of a region. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Acharya, A. (2016). Regionalism beyond EU-centrism. In T.A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 109–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press,.
  • Acharya, A., & Johnston, A. I. (2007). Comparing regional institutions: An introduction. In A. Acharya & A.I. Johnston (Eds.), Crafting cooperation: Regional international institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 1–31).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Al-Fadhat, F. (2019). The rise of international capital: Indonesian conglomerates in ASEAN. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Andersen, M. S. (2012). Legitimacy in state-building: A review of the IR literature. International Political Sociology, 6(2), 205–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2012.00159.x
  • Ang, C. G. (2018). Southeast Asia’s cold war: An interpretive history. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
  • ASEAN Secretariat (1976). Treaty of amity and cooperation in Southeast Asia Indonesia, 24 February 1976. https://asean.org/treaty-amity-cooperation-southeast-asia-indonesia-24-february1976/
  • ASEAN Secretariat (2017a). ASEAN 50 1967–2017: ASEAN economic progress. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. https://www.aseanstats.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/08/ASEAN_economic_progress.pdf
  • ASEAN Secretariat (2017b). ASEAN Investment Report 2017: Foreign direct investment and economic zones in ASEAN. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. https://asean.org/?static_post=asean-investment-report-2017
  • ASEAN Secretariat (2017c). Overview of ASEAN-Japan dialogue relations. August 16. https://asean.org/storage/2012/05/Overview-ASEAN-Japan-Relations-As-of-8-March-2017.pdf
  • Asia Sentinel (2016). Obituary: Association of Southeast Asian Nations (1967–2016), April 29. https://www.asiasentinel.com/politics/obituary-association-southeast-asian-nations/
  • Ba, A. D. (2006). Who’s socializing whom? Complex engagement in Sino-ASEAN relations. The Pacific Review, 19(2), 157–179. doi: 10.1080/09512740500473163
  • Ba, A. D. (2009). [Re] Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, regionalism and the association of Southeast Asian Nations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Ba, A. D. (2013). The association of Southeast Asia Nations: Between internal and external legitimacy. In D. Zaum (Ed.), Legitimating international regional organizations (pp. 132–161). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bae, K.-H. (2017). ASEAN as a community of managerial practices. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 23(2), 245–263. doi: 10.1163/19426720-02302007
  • Bakvis, H., & Skogstad, G. (2012). Canadian federalism: Performance, effectiveness and legitimacy. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
  • Baldwin, R. E. (2004). The spoke trap: Hub-and-spoke bilateralism in East Asia. CNAEC Research Series 04-12. Seoul: Korean Institute for International Economic Policy.
  • Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (1999). The politics, power and pathology of international organizations. International Organization, 53(04), 699–732. doi: 10.1162/002081899551048
  • Beeson, M. (2009). ASEAN ways: Still fit for purpose?. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3), 333–343. doi: 10.1080/09557570903137776
  • Beeson, M. (2014). Security in Asia: What’s different, what’s not? Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 1(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1177/2347797013518403
  • Beeson, M. (2015). Is the “Long Peace” of East Asia exceptional? Review of the long peace of East Asia by T. Kivimaki. International Studies Review, 17(3), 476–478. doi: 10.1111/misr.12241
  • Beeson, M. (2016). Can ASEAN cope with China? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(1), 5–28. doi: 10.1177/186810341603500101
  • Beeson, M. (2016). Multilateralism in East Asia: Less than the sum of its parts?. Global Summitry, 2(1), 54–70. doi: 10.1093/global/guw007
  • Beeson, M. (2017). What’s the point of ASEAN? Asia Times, May 1. http://www.atimes.com/whats-point-asean/
  • Beeson, M. (2019). Asia's competing multilateral initiatives: Quality versus quantity. The Pacific Review, 32(2), 245–255. doi: 10.1080/09512748.2018.1470556
  • Beeson, M., & Gerard, K. (2015). ASEAN, regionalism and democracy. In W. Case (Ed.), Routledge handbook of Southeast Asian democratization (pp. 54–67). Basingstoke: Routledge.
  • Beeson, M., & Stubbs, R. (2012). Conclusion: The future of Asian regionalism. In M. Beeson & R. Stubbs (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Asian regionalism (pp. 420–426). London: Routledge.
  • Beeson, M., & Watson, N. (2019). Is international leadership changing hands or disappearing? China and the USA in comparative perspective. Asian Perspective, 43(2), 389–417.
  • Benny, G., & Abdullah, K. (2011). Indonesian perceptions and attitudes toward the ASEAN community. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 30(1), 39–67. doi: 10.1177/186810341103000102
  • Bernstein, S. (2011). Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18(1), 17–51. doi: 10.1080/09692290903173087
  • Börzel, T.A. & Risse, T. (Eds.). (2016). The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Breslin, S., Higgot, R., & Rosamond, B. (2002). Regions in comparative perspective. In S. Breslin, C.W. Hughes, N. Phillips & B. Rosamond (Eds.), New regionalisms in the global political economy: Theories and cases (pp. 1–19). London: Routledge.
  • Breslin, S., & Wilson, J. (2015). Towards Asian regional functional futures: Bringing Mitrany back in? The Australian Journal of International Affairs, 69(2), 126–143. doi: 10.1080/10357718.2014.978736
  • Caballero-Anthony, M. (2005). Regional security in Southeast Asia: Beyond the ASEAN way. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  • Caballero-Anthony, M. (2006). ISIS and the ASEAN People’s Assembly (APA): Paving a multi-track approach in regional community building. In H. Soesastro, C. Joewono, and C. Hernandez (Eds.), Twenty-two years of ASEAN ISIS: Origin, evolution and challenges of track II diplomacy (pp. 53–73). Jakarta: ASEAN-ISIS.
  • Caballero-Anthony, M, and (2018). Transboundary haze in Southeast Asia: Dealing with elusive regional solutions and implications on ASEAN community. In E. Quah T.S. Tan (Eds.), Pollution across borders transboundary fire, smoke and haze in southeast Asia (pp. 19–30). Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Capie, D., & Evans, P. (2007). The Asia-Pacific security lexicon (2nd ed.). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  • Chainey, R. (2017). 700 Global leaders just met in Cambodia. Here’s what happened, World Economic Forum, 12 May. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/05/700-global-leaders-justmet-in-cambodia-heres-what-happened/
  • Chee, P. L., & Lee, P. P. (1979). The role of Japanese direct investment in Malaysia. Occasional Paper No.60. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  • Chen, L., Cuyvers, L., & De Lombaerde, P. (2017). ASEAN economic integration compared: What do the numbers tell us? The Singapore Economic Review, 62(03), 619–641. doi: 10.1142/S0217590818400039
  • Chia, S. Y. (2017). Modalities for ASEAN integration: Retrospect and going forward. The Singapore Economic Review, 62(03), 561–591. doi: 10.1142/S0217590818400015
  • Chiang, M.-H. (2018). China-ASEAN relations after establishment of free trade area. The Pacific Review, 1. doi: 10.1080/09512748.2018.1470555
  • Chin, G., & Stubbs, R. (2011). China, regional institution-building and the china-ASEAN free trade area. Review of International Political Economy, 18(3), 277–298. doi: 10.1080/09692291003762548
  • Chng, M. K. (1990). ASEAN’s institutional structure and economic co-operation. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 6(3), 268–282. doi: 10.1355/AE6-3B
  • Cook, M. (2018). Southeast Asia’s developing divide. In G. Rozman and J. Liow (Eds.), International relations and Asia’s southern tier: ASEAN, Australia and India (pp. 63–76). Singapore: Springer.
  • Davies, M. (2016). ASEAN centrality losing ground, East Asia Forum, 4 September. http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2016/09/04/asean-centrality-losing-ground/
  • De Lombaerde, P., Söderbaum, F., Van Langenhove, L., & Baert, F. (2010). The problem of comparison in comparative regionalism. Review of International Studies, 36(3), 731–753. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000707
  • Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. doi: 10.2307/1388226
  • Duffield, J. S. (2003). Asia-Pacific security institutions in comparative perspective. In G. J. Ikenberry & M. Mastanduno (Eds.), International relations and the Asia-Pacific (pp. 243–270). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Eaton, S., & Stubbs, R. (2006). Is ASEAN powerful? Neo-realist versus constructivist approaches to power in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 19(2), 135–155. doi: 10.1080/09512740500473148
  • Economist Intelligence Unit (2016). ASEAN in 2017: A 50th anniversary to forget, December 28. http://country.eiu.com/article.aspx?articleid=954957679&Country=Vietnam&topic=Politics
  • EEAS (2015). The EU-ASEAN relationship in twenty facts and figures. European Union External Action Service. http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/factsheets/docs/20150513_key-facts-and-figures_euasean_en.pdf
  • Emmers, R. (2003). Cooperative security and the balance of power in ASEAN and the ARF. London Routledge.
  • Emmerson, D. K. (2007). Challenging ASEAN: A “topological” view. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29(3), 424–446. doi: 10.1355/CS29-3C
  • Gao, Y., & Zhang, J. (2016). Emerging China and its interaction with ASEAN economies. In Kim Y.C. (Ed.), Chinese global production networks in ASEAN (pp. 1–17). Cham: Springer.
  • Gerard, K. (2014). ASEAN’s engagement of civil society: Regulating dissent. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gilson, J. (2012). ASEM. In M. Beeson & R. Stubbs (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of asian regionalism (pp. 394–405). London: Routledge.
  • Goh, E. (2016). Southeast Asian strategies towards the great powers: Still hedging after all these years? The ASAN Forum 6(5), Special Forum, February 22. http://www.theasanforum.org/southeast-asian-strategies-toward-the-great-powers-still-hedgingafter-all-these-years/#2
  • Gray, J. (2014). Life, death or coma? Bureaucracy, trade and the vitality of international economic organizations. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Pennsylvania. https://sites.sas.upenn.edu/jcgray/files/zombies_dec2014.pdf
  • Haftel, Y. Z. (2012). Regional economic institutions and conflict mitigation: Implementation and the promise of peace. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Harbom, L., Melander, E., & Wallensteen, P. (2008). Dyadic dimensions of armed conflict, 1946–2007. Journal of Peace Research, 45(5), 697–710. doi: 10.1177/0022343308094331
  • Hanson, K. (2011). Strengthening legitimacy, effectiveness and efficiency of the UN human rights treaty body system. In Paper prepared for the Lucerne Consultations on Strengthening the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Body System, 20 October, Lucerne, Switzerland. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/TB/HRTD/KarlHanson.pdf
  • Head, J. (2016). What’s the point of ASEAN? BBC News, Asia online. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-36881530
  • Hui, T. (2011). ASEAN integration enters the critical stage: A private sector’s narrative. In Lee Y.Y. (Ed.), ASEAN matters: Reflecting on the association of Southeast Asian Nations (pp. 125–128). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
  • Human Rights Watch (2018). Human rights in Southeast Asia: Briefing materials for the ASEAN-Australia Summit, Sydney, Australia, March 17–18, 2018. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/supporting_resources/asean_australia0318.pdf
  • Jetschke, A. (2012). ASEAN. In M. Beeson & R. Stubbs (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Asian regionalism (pp. 327–337). London: Routledge.
  • Jetschke, A., & Katada, S. N. (2016). Asia. In T.A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 225–248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jones, D. M., & Smith, M. L. R. (2006). ASEAN and East Asian international relation: Regional delusion. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Jones, D. M., & Smith, M. L. R. (2007). Making process not progress: ASEAN and the evolving east Asian regional order. International Security, 32(1), 148–184. doi: 10.1162/isec.2007.32.1.148
  • Jones, L. (2012). ASEAN, sovereignty and intervention in Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Jones, L. (2015). Explaining the failure of the ASEAN economic community: The primacy of domestic political economy. The Pacific Review, 29(5), 1–24.
  • Khanh, H. K., & Indorf, H. (1982). Southeast Asia 1981: Two currents running. Southeast Asian Affairs, 3–25. doi: 10.1355/SEAA82A
  • Katsumata, H. (2006). Establishment of the ASEAN regional forum: Constructing a “Talking Shop” or a “Norm Brewery”?. The Pacific Review, 19(2), 181–198. doi: 10.1080/09512740500473197
  • Katsumata, H. (2009). ASEAN and human rights: Resisting western pressure or emulating the west?. The Pacific Review, 22(5), 619–637. doi: 10.1080/09512740903329731
  • Kingah, S., & Van Langenhove, L. (2012). Determinants of a regional organisation's role in peace and security: The African Union and the European Union compared. South African Journal of International Affairs, 19(2), 201–222. doi: 10.1080/10220461.2012.706890
  • Kivimäki, T. (2001). The long peace of ASEAN. Journal of Peace Research, 38(1), 5–25. doi: 10.1177/0022343301038001001
  • Lacina, B., & Gleditsch, N.-P. (2005). Monitoring trends in global combat: A new dataset of battle deaths. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 21(2–3), 145–166. doi: 10.1007/s10680-005-6851-6
  • Langlois, A. J. (2012). Asian regionalism and human rights: The case of the ASEAN intergovernmental commission on human rights. In M. Beeson & R. Stubbs (Eds.), Routledge handbook on Asian regionalism (pp. 216–225). London: Routledge.
  • Laruelle, M., & Peyrouse, S. (2012). Regional Organizations in Central Asia: Patterns of interaction, dilemmas of efficiency, Working Paper No. 10, Institute of Public Policy and Administration, University of Central Asia. http://www.ucentralasia.org/Content/Downloads/UCA-IPPA-WP-10-RegionalOrganizations.pdf
  • Le Thu, H. (2018). ASEAN: Different strokes for different folks, but future should be in sync. The Interpreter. February 8. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/asean-differentstrokes-different-folks-future-should-be-sync
  • Lee, H. L. (2018). The ASEAN journey and the road ahead. ASEAN Focus, 4
  • Lee, K. Y. (1987). ASEAN in a changing world: Opening address by H.E. Mr. Lee Kuan Yew, Prime Minister of the Republic of Singapore, at the 20th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting, Singapore, 15 June 1987. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 4(2), 213–215.
  • Lee, S., & Milner, A. (2014). Practical vs. identity regionalism: Australia’s APC initiative, a case study. Contemporary Politics, 20(2), 209–228. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2014.907992
  • Leifer, M. (1999). The ASEAN peace process: A category mistake. The Pacific Review, 12(1), 25–38. doi: 10.1080/09512749908719276
  • Mahbubani, K., & Sng, J. (2017). The ASEAN miracle: A catalyst for peace. Singapore: Ridge Books.
  • Martin, L. (1987). The ASEAN success story. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Mastanduno, M. (2014). Realism and Asia. In S.M. Pekkanen, J. Ravenhill & R. Foot (Eds.), Oxford handbook of the international relations of Asia (pp. 25–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Milner, A. (2017). Culture and the international relations of Asia. The Pacific Review, 30(6), 857–869. doi: 10.1080/09512748.2017.1315165
  • Mouzas, S. (2006). Efficiency versus effectiveness in business networks. Journal of Business Research, 59(10–11), 1016–1032.
  • Nair, D. (2015). ‘Saving the States’ face: An ethnography of the ASEAN secretariat and diplomatic field in Jakarta (PhD). London School of Economics and Political Science. http://ethesis.lse.ac.uk/3176/
  • Narine, S. (1998). ASEAN and the management of regional security. Pacific Affairs, 71(2), 195–214. doi: 10.2307/2760976
  • Narine, S. (2018). The new ASEAN in Asia pacific and beyond. Boulder: Lynne Reiner.
  • Natalegawa, M. (2018). Does ASEAN matter? A View from Within. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies).
  • Nesadurai, H. E. S. (2003). Globalisation, domestic politics and regionalism: The ASEAN free trade area. London: Routledge.
  • Nesadurai, H. (2005). Bandung and the political economy of north-south relations: Sowing the seeds for revisioning international society, Working Paper No. 95. Singapore: Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies.
  • Nesadurai, H. E. S. (2017). ASEAN during the life of The Pacific Review: A balance sheet on regional governance and community building. The Pacific Review, 30(6), 938–951. doi: 10.1080/09512748.2017.1304436
  • Nesadurai, H. E. S. (2018). Transnational civil society, the market and governance reform in Southeast Asia. In A.D. Ba & M. Beeson (Eds.), Contemporary Southeast Asia (pp. 198–214). London: Palgrave.
  • Nikitina, Y. (2016). Measuring the efficiency of regional institutions in Eurasia. Russian Politics & Law, 54(5–6), 477–493.
  • Orr, R. M. Jr. (1987). The rising sun: Japan’s foreign aid to ASEAN, the Pacific Basin and the Republic of Korea. Journal of International Affairs, 41(1), 39–62.
  • Parks, T., Maramis, L., Sunchindah, A., & Wongwatanakul, W. (2018). ASEAN as the architect for regional developmental cooperation: Managing ASEAN centrality and catalyzing action for sustainable development. San Francisco: Asia Foundation. https://asiafoundation.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/09/ASEAN-as-the-Architect-for-Regional-DevelopmentCooperation_Nov2018.pdf
  • Pasuk, P. (1987). Decision-making on overseas direct investment by Japanese small and medium industries. Bangkok: Economics Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University.
  • Pambagyo, I. (2017). RCEP is the only game in town. ASEAN Focus, 14(2), 26–27.
  • Pekkanen, S. M. (2016). Asian designs: Governance in the Contemporary World. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Peou, S. (2010). Peace and security in the Asia-Pacific: Theory and practice. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger.
  • Pinker, S. and Mack, A. (2014). The world is not falling apart: Never mind the headlines. We’ve never lived in such peaceful times. Slate, December 22. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2014/12/the_world_is_not_falling_apart_the_trend_lines_reveal_an_increasingly_peaceful.html
  • Prawiro, R. (1990). Opening address by H.E. Radius Prawiro, Coordinating Minister for Economy, Finance, Industry and Development Supervision, Indonesia, for the Sixteenth ASCOPE Meeting Jakarta, 6–8 September 1990. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 7(3), 341–345.
  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Ravenhill, J. (2008). Fighting irrelevance: An economic community “with ASEAN Characteristics”. The Pacific Review, 21(4), 469–488.
  • Ravenhill, J. (2009). East Asian regionalism: Much Ado about Nothing. Review of International Studies, 35(S1), 215–235. doi: 10.1017/S0260210509008493
  • Ravenhill, J. (2010). The “New East Asian Regionalism”: A political domino effect. Review of International Political Economy, 17(2), 178–208. doi: 10.1080/09692290903070887
  • Rhee, C. H. (2018). Reaching the next level: For Southeast Asia, further progress calls for bold reforms. Finance and Development, 55(3). http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2018/09/southeast-asia-progress-and-reform-rhee.htm
  • Saravanamuttu, J., & Han, D. (2016). Malaysia–China relations: A new turn? RSIS Commentary No. 274, November 4.
  • Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Institutionalism. In C. Hay, M. Lister & D. Marsh (Eds.), The state: Theories and issues (pp. 98–117). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and “throughput”. Political Studies, 61(1), 2–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x
  • Severino, R. C. (2006). Southeast Asia in search of an ASEAN community: Insights from the former ASEAN secretary-general. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  • Snitwongse, K. (1998). Thirty years of ASEAN: Achievements through political cooperation. The Pacific Review, 11(2), 183–194. doi: 10.1080/09512749808719252
  • Söderbaum, F. (2016). Rethinking regionalism. London: Palgrave.
  • Stubbs, R. (2002). ASEAN plus three: Emerging East Asian regionalism?. Asian Survey, 42(3), 440–455.
  • Stubbs, R. (2008). The ASEAN alternative? Ideas, institutions and the challenge to “Global” governance. The Pacific Review, 21(4), 451–467.
  • Stubbs, R. (2009). Meeting the challenges of region-building in ASEAN. In M. Beeson (Ed.), Contemporary Southeast Asia (2nd ed., pp. 234–247). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Stubbs, R. (2014). ASEAN’s leadership in East Asian region-building: Strength in weakness. The Pacific Review, 27(4), 523–541. doi: 10.1080/09512748.2014.924229
  • Stubbs, R. (2015). ASEAN summits and regional governance in comparative perspective. In Olivier Dabène, Gordon Mace, Jean-Philippe Thérien & Diana Tussie (Eds.), Summits and regional Governance: The Americas in comparative perspective (pp. 159–176). New York: Routledge.
  • Stubbs, R., & Mitrea, S. (2017). ASEAN at 50: The global political economy’s contribution to durability. Contemporary Politics, 23(4), 388–407. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2017.1314061
  • Tai, B. K. M. (2011). Can we do anything about the unimplemented ASEAN agreements. In Lee Y.Y. (Ed.), ASEAN matters: Reflecting on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (pp. 23–28). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
  • Tallberg, J., Bäckstrand, K., & Scholte, J. A. (2018). Introduction: Legitimacy in global governance. In Tallberg, J, Bäckstrand, K., & Scholte, J.A. (Eds.), Legitimacy in global governance: Sources, processes and consequences (pp. 3–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • The Habibe Center (2016). So close, but yet so far: Public perceptions of ASEAN. ASEAN Briefs, 3(6). http://admin.thcasean.org/assets/uploads/file/2016/08/PB_Vol.3_Issue_6_.pdf
  • Termsak, C. (2017). Personal communications. Dr. Termsak was Director of Political and Security Cooperation at the ASEAN Secretariat and is currently a Fellow of the ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.
  • Thompson, E. C., & Thianthai, C. (2008). Attitudes and awareness towards ASEAN: Findings of a ten-nation survey, Report No.2, Asian Studies Centre. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  • Thompson, E. C., Thianthai, C., & Thuzar, M. 2016. Do young people know ASEAN? Up-date of a ten-nation survey. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  • Urata, S. (2018). Free trade agreements and patterns of trade in East Asia from the 1990s to the 2010s. East Asian Community Review, 1(1–2), 61–73. doi: 10.1057/s42215-018-0007-3
  • Wallner, J. (2008). Legitimacy and public policy: Seeing beyond effectiveness, efficiency and performance. Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), 421–443. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00275.x
  • Yukawa, T. (2018). The ASEAN way as a symbol: An analysis of discourses on the ASEAN norms. The Pacific Review, 31(3), 298–314. doi: 10.1080/09512748.2017.1371211

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.