References
- Acharya . (2009). Arguing about ASEAN: What do we disagree about? Cambridge Review of International Affairs , 22 (3), 493–499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570903138444
- Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization , 58 (2), 239–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024
- Ba, A. D. (2005). Contested spaces: The politics of regional and global governance. In A. D. Ba , and M. J. Hoffmann (Eds.), Contending perspectives in global governance: Coherence, contestation, and world order (pp. 190–212). New York: Routledge.
- Ba, A. D. (2009). (Re)Negotiating East & Southeast Asia: Regions, regionalisms, and ASEAN . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Ba, A. D. (2014). Institutional divergence and convergence in the Asia Pacific? ASEAN in practice and theory. Cambridge Review of International Affairs , 27 (2), 295–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2014.889082
- Baviera, A. and Maranis, L. (Eds.). (2017). Building ASEAN community: Political-Security and socio-Cultural reflections . Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.
- Beeson, M. (2008). Institutions of the Asia Pacific: ASEAN, APEC and beyond . London: Routledge.
- Bennett, A. (2013). The mother of all isms: Causal mechanisms and structured pluralism in international relations theory. European Journal of International Relations , 19 (3), 459–481. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495484
- Booth, K. (ed.). (2011). Realism and world politics . London: Routledge.
- Capie, D. (2008). Localization as resistance: The contested diffusion of small arms norms in Southeast Asia. Security Dialogue , 39 (6), 637–657. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010608098213
- Carlson, A. , Katzenstein, P. J. , & Suh, J. J. (eds). (2004). Rethinking security in East Asia: Identity, power and efficiency . New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Chan, S. (2012). Looking for balance: China, the United States, and power balancing in East Asia . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Checkel, J. T. (2012). Theoretical pluralism in IR: Possibilities and limits. In W. Carlsnaes , T. Risse , & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (2nd ed, pp. 220–241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Cheng, C. , & Brettle, A. (2019). How cognitive frameworks shape the American approach to international relations and security studies. Journal of Global Security Studies , 4 (3), 321–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz026
- Cho, Y. (2013). Taking stock of monetary regionalism in East Asia: A glass half-full or half-empty? The Journal of East Asian Affairs , 27 (2), 55–88.
- Collins, A. (2014). Bringing communities back: Security communities and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ plural turn. Cooperation and Conflict , 49 (2), 276–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713517567
- Cornut, J. (2015). Analytic eclecticism in practice: A method for combining international relations theories. International Studies Perspectives , 16 (1), 50–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12072
- Davies, M. (2016). A community of practice: Explaining change and continuity in ASEAN's diplomatic environment. The Pacific Review , 29 (2), 211–233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2015.1013495
- Davies, M. (2019). ASEAN’s peculiar order: Performance, ritual, and symbol in Southeast Asian Relations. Paper Presented at the International Studies Association Conference , Singapore, July 5.
- Eaton, S. , & Stubbs, R. (2006). Is ASEAN Powerful? Neo-Realist versus constructivist approaches to power in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review , 19 (2), 135–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500473148
- Emmerson, D. (2007). Challenging ASEAN: A “topological” view. Contemporary Southeast Asia , 29 (3), 424–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1355/CS29-3C
- Foot, R. , & Goh, E. (2018). The International Relations of East Asia: A New Research Prospectus. International Studies Review , viy015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy015
- Gerard, K. (2014). ASEAN and civil society activities in ‘created spaces’: The limits of liberty. The Pacific Review , 27 (2), 265–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.882395
- Glas, A. (2017). Habits of peace: Long-term regional cooperation in Southeast Asia. European Journal of International Relations , 23 (4), 833–856. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116679878
- Goh, E. (2013). The struggle for order: Hegemony, hierarchy, and transition in post-Cold War East Asia . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Haacke, J. (1999). The concept of flexible engagement and the practice of enhanced interaction: Intramural Challenges to the ‘ASEAN Way. The Pacific Review , 12 (4), 581–611. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749908719307
- He, K. (2008). Institutional Balancing in the Asia Pacific: Economic interdependence and China's rise . London: Routledge.
- Jetschke, A. , & Rüland, J. (2009). Decoupling rhetoric and practice: The cultural limits of ASEAN cooperation. The Pacific Review , 22 (2), 179–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740902815326
- Jones, D. M. , & Smith, M. L. R. (2007). Making process not progress: ASEAN and the evolving East Asian regional order. International Security , 32 (1), 148–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2007.32.1.148
- Jones, L. (2016). Explaining the failure of the ASEAN economic community: The primacy of domestic political economy. The Pacific Review , 29 (5), 647–670. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2015.1022593
- Karim, M. (2008). Future of the haze agreement: Is the glass half Empty or half Full. Environmental Policy and Law , 38 (6), 328–334.
- Koga, K. (2014). Institutional transformation of ASEAN: ZOPFAN, TAC, and the Bali Concord I in 1968–1976. The Pacific Review , 27 (5), 729–753. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.948566
- Kuik, C. C. (2016). How do weaker states hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China. Journal of Contemporary China , 25 (100), 500–514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1132714
- Lake, D. A. (2011). Why ‘isms’ are evil: Theory, epistemology, and academic sects as impediments to understanding and progress. International Studies Quarterly , 55 (2), 465–480. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00661.x
- Martel, S. (2017). From ambiguity to contestation: Discourse(s) of non-traditional security in the ASEAN community. The Pacific Review , 30 (4), 549–565. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1264462
- Nesadurai, H. (2009). ASEAN and regional governance after the Cold War: From regional order to regional community? The Pacific Review , 22 (1), 91–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740802651169
- Quayle, L. (2013). Southeast Asia and the English School of International Relations: A region-theory dialogue . Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave-MacMillan.
- Ravenhill, J. (2009). East Asian regionalism: Much Ado about nothing? Review of International Studies , 35 (S1), 215–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008493
- Rüland, J. (2000). ASEAN and the Asian crisis: theoretical implications and practical consequences for Southeast Asian regionalism. The Pacific Review , 13 (3), 421–453. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740050147942
- Sil, R. , & Katzenstein, P. (eds.). (2010). Beyond paradigms . Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
- Sil, R. , & Katzenstein, P. (2011). De-Centering, not discarding, the ‘‘isms’’: Some friendly amendments. International Studies Quarterly , 55 (2), 481–485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00657.x
- Stubbs, R. (2002). ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East Asian regionalism? Asian Survey , 42 (3), 440–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2002.42.3.440
- Stubbs, R. (2005). Rethinking Asia’s economic miracle . Basingstoke: Palgrave.
- Stubbs, R. (2019). ASEAN sceptics versus ASEAN proponents: Evaluating regional institutions. The Pacific Review , 1. online 21 May 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1611627
- Sukma, R. (2008). The ASEAN charter: Neither bold nor visionary. In P. Chachavalpongpun (Ed.), The road to ratification and implementation of the ASEAN Charter (pp. 44–59). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
- Tow, W. (2015). Asian and Pacific regional cooperation: Turning zones of conflict into arenas of peace by Michael Haas’ (book review). The Journal of Asian Studies , 74 (1), 175–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911814001727
- Yen, Y. (2011). The formation of the ASEAN intergovernmental commission on human rights: A protracted journey. Journal of Human Rights , 10 (3), 393–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2011.596070