References
- Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. New York: Routledge.
- Acharya, A. (2017). The Myth of ASEAN Centrality?. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 39(2), 273–279.
- ASEAN Secretariat. (2016). Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity 2025. Jakarta.
- ASEAN Secretariat. (2018a). ASEAN-China Strategic Partnership Vision 2030. Jakarta.
- ASEAN Secretariat. (2018b). Enhancing ASEAN Connectivity: Developing a Rolling Priority Pipeline of ASEAN Infrastructure Projects.
- ASEAN Secretariat. (2018c). New ASEAN body, the Lead Implementing Body for Sustainable Infrastructure, established to strengthen connectivity and infrastructure. Retrieved from https://asean.org/new-asean-body-the-lead-implementing-body-for-sustainable-infrastructure-established-to-strengthen-connectivity-and-infrastructure/
- ASEAN Secretariat. (2018d). Summary Record of the ASEAN Connectivity Coordinating Committee (ACCC) Consultations with Dialogue Partners and Other External Partners on Connectivity, Singapore.
- ASEAN Secretariat. (2019). ASEAN identifies potential infrastructure projects. Retrieved from https://asean.org/asean-identifies-potential-infrastructure-projects/.
- Asia-Europe Meeting. (2017). Strengthening Partnership for Peace and Sustainable Development: Chair’s Statement. Nay Pyi Taw Myanmar.
- Asian Development Bank. (2017). (February Meeting Asia’s Infrastructure Needs. Manila.
- Ba, A. D. (2013). ASEAN centrality imperiled? ASEAN institutionalism and the challenges of major power institutionalization. In R. Emmers (Ed.), Routledge security in Asia Pacific: V. 17. ASEAN and the institutionalization of East Asia (pp. 122–137New York: Routledge.
- Biermann, R., & Harsch, M. (2017). Resource Dependence Theory. In J. A. Koops & R. Biermann (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations in World Politics (pp. 135–155). London: Palgrave.
- Bisley, N. (2019). Contested Asia’s ‘New’ multilateralism and regional order. The Pacific Review, 32(2), 221–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2018.1465456
- Caballero-Anthony, M. (2014). Understanding ASEAN’s centrality: Bases and prospects in an evolving regional architecture. The Pacific Review, 27(4), 563–584. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.924227
- Ciorciari, J. D. (2008). The balance of great-power influence in contemporary Southeast Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 9(1), 157–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcn017
- Ciorciari, J. D. (2019). The variable effectiveness of hedging strategies. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(3), 523–555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcz007
- CSIS. (2018). The BUILD Act Has Passed: What’s Next? Retrieved from https://www.csis.org/analysis/build-act-has-passed-whats-next
- European Commission. (2018). Connecting Europe and Asia - Building blocks for an EU Strategy: Joint Communication to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank. Brussels.
- Foreign Ministry of Thailand. (2011). Thailand’s Proposal on the “3Cs” for ASEAN. Retrieved from https://www.thaiembassy.sg/press_media/news-highlights/thailand%E2%80%99s-proposal-on-the-%E2%80%9C3cs%E2%80%9D-for-asean
- Fukunaga, Y. (2015). ASEAN’s Leadership in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 2(1), 103–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.59
- Gill, B., & Green, M. J. (2009). Unbundling Asia’s new multilateralism. In M. Green & B. Gill (Eds.), Asia’s new multilateralism: Cooperation, competition, and the search for community (pp. 1–29). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
- Goh, E. (2005). Meeting the China challenge: The U.S. in Southeast Asian regional security strategies. Policy studies: Vol. 16. Washington, DC: East-West Center Washington.
- Goh, E. (2016). Southeast Asian Strategies toward the Great Powers: Still Hedging after All These Years? The Asan Forum.
- Goh, E., & Reilly, J. (2018). How China’s Belt and Road builds connections. Retrieved. from https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2018/01/04/how-chinas-belt-and-road-builds-connections/
- Haacke, J. (2019). The concept of hedging and its application to Southeast Asia: A critique and a proposal for a modified conceptual and methodological framework. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(3), 375–417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcz010
- He, K. (2019). Contested multilateralism 2.0 and regional order transition: Causes and implications. The Pacific Review, 32(2), 210–220.
- Hong, Z. (2018). Chinese and Japanese infrastructure investment in Southeast Asia: From Rivalry to cooperation? IDE Discussion Paper. (No. 689).
- Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2016). Japan’s assistance to ASEAN Connectivity in line with MPAC 2025: Presentation by Kazuo Sunaga, Ambassador of Japan to ASEAN.
- Jetschke, A. (2009). Institutionalizing ASEAN: Celebrating Europe through network governance. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3), 407–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570903107688
- Jetschke, A., & Rüland, J. (2009). Decoupling rhetoric and practice: The cultural limits of ASEAN cooperation. The Pacific Review, 22(2), 179–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740902815326
- JICA. (2019). Philippines Operations Map and Project list as of (February 2019). Retrieved from https://www.jica.go.jp/philippine/english/activities/c8h0vm00004cez31-att/index_01.pdf
- Joint Research Centre. (2017). ASEM Sustainable Connectivity Index Concept Note. Ispra.
- Jones, D. M., & Jenne, N. (2016). Weak states’ regionalism: ASEAN and the limits of security cooperation in Pacific Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 16(2), 209–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcv015
- Jones, L. (2010). Still in the “Drivers’ Seat”, But for How Long? Asean’s Capacity for Leadership in East-Asian International Relations. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29(3), 95–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341002900305
- Koch, M. (2015). World Organizations-(Re-) Conceptualizing International Organizations. World Political Science, 11(1), 97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/wps-2015-0003
- Koga, K. (2018). ASEAN’s Evolving Institutional Strategy: Managing Great Power Politics in South China Sea Disputes. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11(1), 49–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pox016
- Kraft, H. J. S. (2017). Great Power Dynamics and the Waning of ASEAN Centrality in Regional Security. Asian Politics & Policy, 9(4), 597–612. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12350
- Kuik, C.C. (2008). The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s Response to a Rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 30(2), 159–185.
- Kuik, C.C. (2018). Keeping the Balance: Power Transitions Threaten ASEAN’s Hedging Role. East Asia Forum Quarterly, 10(2), 22–23.
- Le Thu, H. (2019). China’s dual strategy of coercion and inducement towards ASEAN. The Pacific Review, 32(1), 20–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1417325
- Lim, D. J., & Cooper, Z. (2015). Reassessing hedging: The logic of alignment in. Security Studies, 24(4), 696–727. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1103130
- Lim, D. J., & Mukherjee, R. (2019). Hedging in South Asia: Balancing economic and security interests amid Sino-Indian competition. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(3), 493–522. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcz006
- Ministry of Finance of Malaysia. (2015). November 25). Presentation: ASEAN Infrastructure Fund (AIF). Bangkok. Retrieved from Ministry of Finance of Malaysia website: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/5b%20-%20ASEAN%20Infrastructure%20Fund.pdf
- Mueller, L. M. (2019). ASEAN centrality under threat–the cases of RCEP and connectivity. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 8(2), 177–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2019.1691703
- Müller, L. M. (2018). Governing regional Connectivity in Southeast Asia - The Role of the ASEAN Secretariat and ASEAN’s External Partners. Occasional Paper, (42).
- Nguitragool, P., & Rüland, J. (2015). ASEAN as an actor in international fora: Reality, potential and constraints. Integration through law: The role of law and the rule of law in ASEAN integration. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
- Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective: Stanford University Press.
- Rana, P. B., & Ji, X. (2019). China is paving a Belt and Road 2.0. Retrieved from https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2019/05/21/china-is-paving-a-belt-and-road-2-0/
- Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
- Sonoura, K. (2017). September). Japan’s initiatives for promoting “Quality Infrastructure Investment,” New York City. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000291344.pdf
- Tan, S. S. (2017). Rethinking “ASEAN Centrality” in the Regional Governance of East Asia. The Singapore Economic Review, 62(03), 721–740. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590818400076
- Tan, S. S. (2020). Consigned to hedge: South-east Asia and America’s ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’ strategy. International Affairs, 96(1), 131–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz227
- World Economic Forum. (2015). November 10). 5 things to know about the New Silk Road. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/11/5-things-to-know-about-the-new-silk-road/
- Wilson, J. D. (2017). The evolution of China’s Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: From a revisionist to status-seeking agenda. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(1), 147–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcx015
- Wu, S. S., & Chong, A. (2018). Developmental Railpolitics: The Political Economy of China’s High-Speed Rail Projects in Thailand and Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 40(3), 503–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1355/cs40-3g
- Yoshimatsu, H. (2012). ASEAN and evolving power relations in East Asia: Strategies and constraints. Contemporary Politics, 18(4), 400–415.