Norm contestation, statecraft and the South China Sea: defending maritime order

References

• Adamson, F. (2019, April 29). Speech: The indo-pacific: Australia’s perspective. Kuala Lumpur.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191000031X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Associated Press. (2019, September 10). Liberal MP Gladys Liu refuses to say China's actions in South China Sea unlawful. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, S. (2016, March 10). Australia’s flawed position on the South China Sea. East Asia Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, S. (2015a). Some thoughts on Australia and the freedoms of navigation. Security Challenges, 11(2), 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, S. (2015b, May 28). What are Australia’s interests in the South China Sea? The Strategist. Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, S. (2020). Freedoms of navigation in the Asia-Pacific region. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2015, January 15). Australia conducting 'freedom of navigation' flights in South China Sea. BBC.
   Google Scholar
• Beckley, M. (2017). The emerging military balance in East Asia: How China's neighbors can check Chinese naval expansion. International Security, 42(2), 78–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, M., & Chubb, A. (2019). Australia, China and the maritime ‘rules-based international order’: Comparing the South China Sea and timor sea disputes. International Relations of Asia-Pacific. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcz022.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkevold, J.I., & Till, G. (2016). International order at sea: What it is. How it is challenged. How it is maintained. In J.I. Bekkevold and G. Till (Eds.), International order at sea: How it is challenged. How it is maintained (pp. 3–14). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bisley, N., & Schreer, B. (2018). Australia and the rules-based order in Asia: Of principles and pragmatism. Asian Survey, 58(2), 302–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2018.58.2.302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, E. (2017). Out of the “Slipstream” of Power? Australian grand strategy and the South China Sea disputes. Stockholm: Institute for Security and Development Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. (2019, September). No longer a middle power: Australia’s strategy in the 21st century. Focus Stratégique 92.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2019). How much trade transits the South China Sea? Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, A. (2018, October). Is there a problem with Australia’s South China Sea policy? China Matters Explores.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. (2020). Outer limits of the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles from the baselines: Submissions to the Commission: Submission by Australia. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/submission_aus.htm
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2013). Defence WhitePaper. Australia: Department of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (1987). Defence white paper. Australia: Department of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2012). Australia in the Asian century white paper. Australia: Department of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2016). Defence white paper. Australia: Department of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2017a). Foreign policy white paper. Australia: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2017b, March 30). Parliamentary debates. House of Representatives.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2017c, November 30). Parliamentary debates. Senate.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2017d, December 5). Parliamentary debates. House of Representatives.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2018a, October 24). Foreign affairs, defence and trade legislation committee. Senate.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2018b, October 25). Foreign affairs, defence and trade legislation committee. Senate.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2018c, March 26). Parliamentary debates. House of Representatives.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2019a, February 20). Foreign affairs, defence and trade legislation committee. Senate.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2019b, February 21). Foreign affairs, defence and trade legislation committee. Senate.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2019c, April 10). Foreign affairs, defence and trade legislation committee. Senate.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2019d, July 30). Parliamentary debates. Senate.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A. (2016, March 4). Timor sea treaties show Australia’s commitment to rules-based order. Lowy Interpreter, Lowy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., & Zimmerman, L. (2019). Norms under challenge: Unpacking the dynamics of norm robustness. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(1), 2–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., & Zimmermann, L. (2013). Things we lost in the fire. How different types of contestation affect the validity of international norms (HSFK Arbeitspapiere 18). Frankfurt: Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defence. (2018). Annual report 2017–2018. Canberra: Department of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2018a). Australia and timor-leste maritime boundaries: Rules-based order in action. Retrieved from http://dfat.gov.au/geo/timor-leste/Documents/aus-timor-maritime-boundary-fact-sheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2018b). East Asia Summit. Retrieved from https://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/regional-architecture/eas/Pages/east-asia-summit-eas
   Google Scholar
• Emmers, R., & Teo, S. (2018). Security Strategiesof Middle Powers in the Asia-Pacific. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press
   Google Scholar
• Fierravanti Wells, C. (2019, June 7). Hold the line on Beijing’s power posturing. The Australian.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52 (4), 887–917. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Z., & Jia, B.B. (2013). The nine-dash line in the South China Sea: History, status and implications. American Journal of International Law, 107(1), 98–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geoscience Australia. (2020). The Law of the Sea. Retrieved from https://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/marine/jurisdiction/law-of-the-sea.
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, J. (2019, November 21). Chinese military strategic perspective and its military aims in the South China Sea. Australian Outlook.
   Google Scholar
• Guilfoyle, D. (2019a). The oceans. In G. Nagtzaam, E. van Hook, and D. Guilfoyle (Eds.), International environmental law: A case study analysis. Abingdon UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guilfoyle, D. (2019b). The rule of law and maritime security: Understanding lawfare in the South China Sea. International Affairs, 95(5), 999–1017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. (2018). Silent Invasion: China’s influence in Australia. Richmond, Australia: Hardie Grant.
   Google Scholar
• Hayton, B. (2014). The South China Sea and the Struggle for Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. (2019, January 20). Time to use China's A2/AD military strategy against them. National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/time-use-chinas-a2ad-military-strategy-against-them-42012.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchens, G. (2017, February 21). Australia should not join US in South China Sea operations, says retired defence chief. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D.M., & Smith, M.L.R. (2015, November 24). Can Asean ever solve the South China Seas dispute through multilateral dialogue? The Telegraph.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. (2011, August 15). The South China Sea is the future of conflict. Foreign Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Kardon, I. (2018). China Can Say "No": Analyzing China's Rejection of the South China Sea Arbitration. University of Pennsylvania Asian Law Review, 13, 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Karotam, C. (2017). Are Australia’s national interests jeopardised by a South China Sea dominated by China? Canberra: Indo-Pacific Strategic Digest.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, S. (2008). Freedom of navigation in the Indo-Pacific region. Canberra: Sea Power Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, A., & Rapp-Hopper, M. (2015, November 6). An answer to the innocent passage mystery? Lawfare.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N., Mossop, J., & Rothwell, D. (2010). Australia, New Zealand and Maritime Security. In N. Klein, J. Mossop & D. Rothwell (Eds.), Maritime security: International law and policy perspectives from Australia and New Zealand. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, T. (2019). Building a new legal order for the oceans. Singapore: National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Kraska, J., & Pedrozo, R. (2013). International Maritime Security Law. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Kraska, J., & Pedrozo, R. (2018). The free sea: The American fight for freedom of navigation. Annapolis, US: Naval Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, J. (2018, February 28). The British are coming to the South China Sea, and it's about time. Lawfare.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, J. (2020, January 9). Battle of the bastions. War on the Rocks.
   Google Scholar
• Le Thu, H. (2018, July 13). The dangerous quest for a code of conduct in the South China Sea. Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Le Thu, H. (2019, August 28). Morrison bolsters bilateral ties while avoiding China rhetoric in Vietnam. The Strategist. Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lowy Institute. (2016). Lowy Institute Poll. Retrieved from https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/lowy-institute-poll-2016
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2019, September 11). Labor targets PM over Gladys Liu's alleged links to Chinese Communist party. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Minister for Foreign Affairs. (2016). Press Release. Retrieved from https://foreignminister.gov.au/articles/Pages/2016/jb_ar_160830.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Morton, K. (2016). China's ambition in the South China Sea: Is a legitimate maritime order possible? International Affairs, 92(4), 909–940. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. (2017, November 29). Sam Dastyari: Senator recorded contradicting Labor on South China Sea. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Odom, J.G. (2019). Maritime claims in the South China Sea and freedom of navigation operations. In T. Tran, J. Welfield, and T. Le (Eds.), Building a normative order in the South China Sea: Evolving disputes, expanding options (pp. 171–194). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• People’s Republic of China. (2009, May 7). Note verbale: CML 17/2009. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/mysvnm33_09/chn_2009re_mys_vnm_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Riordan, P. (2016, July 13). Julie Bishop warns freedom of navigation exercises will escalate tensions. Financial Review.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. (2018). ASEAN, the “South China Sea” arbitral award, and the code of conduct: New challenges, new approaches. Asian Politics & Policy, 10 (2), 190–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12391
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, D., & Stephens, T. (2004). Illegal Southern Ocean fishing and prompt release: Balancing coastal and flag state rights and interests. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 53(1), 171–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/53.1.171
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, F. (2015, Wednesday 23). China admonishes Malcolm Turnbull on South China Sea comments. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS). (2017, March 7). Understanding freedoms of navigation—ASEAN perspectives. Event report.
   Google Scholar
• Sang, H.T. (2017). Australia’s engagement in the South China Sea under the prospect theory approach and implications for Australia-Vietnam relations. Asian Culture and History, 9 (2), 60–70.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, C., & Storey, I. (2009). South China Sea dispute: Increasing stakes and rising tensions. Washington, DC: The Jamestown Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, C. (2018, December 28). Pentagon urges allies to step up South China Sea patrols. The Australian.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, C. (2018, July 23). US tells Australia to take on China over disputed islands. The Australian.
   Google Scholar
• Strating, R. (2017). Timor-Leste’s foreign policy approach to the Timor Sea: Pipeline or pipedream? Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(3), 259–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1258689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strating, R. (2018). Maritime territorialization, UNCLOS and the timor sea dispute. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 40 (1), 101–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1355/cs40-1e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strating, R. (2019). A “new chapter” in Australia–Timor bilateral relations? Assessing the politics of the timor sea maritime boundary treaty. The Australian Year Book of International Law, 36(1), 58–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/26660229_03601005
   Google Scholar
• Strating, R. (2020a). Defending the Maritime Rules-based Order: Regional non-claimant states and the South China Sea disputes. Honolulu, US: East West Center.
   Google Scholar
• Strating, R. (2020b). Strategy at sea: A Plan B for Australian maritime security? Security Challenges, 16 (2), 58–70.
   Google Scholar
• Suryadinata, L., & Izzuddin, M. (2017, March 3). Mismatched Expectations in Jokowi’s Maiden Visit to Australia. The Diplomat.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2014). The South China Sea is not a flashpoint. The Washington Quarterly, 37(1), 99–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2014.893176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2016). Australia and Asia's maritime disputes: Continuity amidst Chaos. The Asan Forum, 4 (1), http://www.theasanforum.org/australia-and-asias-maritime-disputes-continuity-amidst-chaos/.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2020). Is Australia's Indo-Pacific strategy an illusion? International Affairs, 96 (1), 95–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., & Tow, B. (2016). Australia debates the South China Sea: Is there a Third Way? In The South China Sea: Middle power perspectives (pp. 2–5).Centre of Gravity series paper 27, Canberra: Australian National University. 
   Google Scholar
• Tillett, A. (2019, August 22). Vietnam's South China Sea plea to Morrison. Australian Financial Review.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, M. (2017, June 3). Keynote address at the 16th IISS Asia security summit. Shangri-La Dialogue.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, M. (2020). A Bigger Picture. Richmond: Hardie Grant.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Compulsory Conciliation. (2016, September 19). Decision on Australia’s objections to competence.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Defense. (2019). Indo-Pacific strategy report: Preparedness, partnerships, and promoting a networked region. Washington DC: United States Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, J. (2019). Norm robustness and the responsibility to protect. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(1), 53–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, B. (2019, February 12). Future South China Sea FONOPS will include allies, partners. US Naval Institute News.
   Google Scholar
• Wesley, M. (2013). Australia’s interests in the South China Sea. In L. Buszynski and C. Roberts (Eds.), The South China Sea and Australia’s regional security environment. Canberra: National Security College.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (2017, June 26). South China Sea: US policy must begin at home. Lowy Institute, Lowy Interpreter.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. (2008). The invisible constitution of politics: Contested norms and international encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. (2014). A theory of contestation. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. (2018). Contestation and constitution of norms in global international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, C. (2019). Whose ‘Freedom of Navigation’? Australia, China, the United States and the making of order in the ‘Indo-Pacific. The Pacific Review, 32(4), 475–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2018.1515788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wroe, D. (2018, March 6). Australia's new maritime deal fuelled by fears of regional disorder amid China's rise. Sydney Morning Herald.
   Google Scholar