1,210
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The agency of secondary states in order transition in the Indo-Pacific

References

  • Acharya, A. (2017). The myth of ASEAN centrality? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 39(2), 273–279. doi:10.1355/cs39-2a
  • Acharya, A. (2018). Constructing global order: Agency and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Adler-Nissen, R., & Zarakol, A. (2021). Struggles for recognition: The liberal international order and the merger of its discontents. International Organization, 75(2), 611–634. doi:10.1017/S0020818320000454
  • Akaha, T., & Hirata, K. (2021). US bilateralism under Trump, power shift in East Asia, and implications for regional security and prosperity: A theoretical analysis of japan’s strategic adjustment. In T. Akaha, J. Yuan, & W. Liang (Eds.), Trump’s America and international relations in the Indo-Pacific: Theoretical analysis of changes & continuities (pp. 19–52). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  • Allison, G. T. (2017). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Allison, G. T., & Schmidt, E. (2022). Semiconductor dependency imperils American security. Retrieved June 28, 2022, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/semiconductor-dependency-imperils-american-security-chip-manufacturing-technology-sector-11655654650.
  • Allison-Reumann, L. (2017). The norm-diffusion capacity of ASEAN: Evidence and challenges. Pacific Focus, 32(1), 5–29. doi:10.1111/pafo.12089
  • Anderson, N. D. (2017). Explaining North Korea’s nuclear ambitions: Power and position on the Korean Peninsula. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(6), 621–641. doi:10.1080/10357718.2017.1317328
  • Ba, A. D. (2016). ASEAN’s stakes: The South China sea’s challenge to autonomy and agency. Asia Policy, 21(1), 47–53. doi:10.1353/asp.2016.0001
  • Baldacchino, G., & Wivel, A. (2020). Small states: Concepts and theories. In G. Baldacchino & A. Wivel (Eds.), Handbook on the politics of small states (pp. 2–19). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Beckley, M. (2017). The emerging military balance in East Asia: How China’s neighbors can check Chinese naval expansion. International Security, 42(2), 78–119. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00294
  • Beeson, M. (2022). Decentered? ASEAN's Struggle to accommodate great power competition. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(1), 1–9. doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksab044
  • Caballero-Anthony, M. (2014). Understanding ASEAN’s centrality: bases and prospects in an evolving regional architecture. The Pacific Review, 27(4), 563–584. doi:10.1080/09512748.2014.924227
  • Chan, S. (2021). Challenging the liberal order: The US Hegemon as a revisionist power. International Affairs, 97(5), 1335–1352. doi:10.1093/ia/iiab074
  • Chan, S., Hu, W., & He, K. (2019). Discerning states’ revisionist and status-quo orientations: Comparing China and the US. European Journal of International Relations, 25(2), 613–640. doi:10.1177/1354066118804622
  • Chen, D., & Chen, Y. (2022, June 15). Will IPEF help the US counter China? The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2022/06/will-ipef-help-the-us-counter-china/.
  • Chu, M. M. (2014). Rethinking globalization-security linkages with references to the semiconductor industry across the Taiwan Strait. In M. M. Chu & S. L. Kastner (Eds.), Globalization and security relations across the Taiwan Strait: In the shadow of China (pp. 183–203). London: Routledge.
  • Cole, J. M. (2019). Taiwan’s domestic dynamics and foreign policy. In B. Schreer, & A. T. H. Tan (Eds.), The Taiwan issue: Problems and prospects (pp. 28–42). Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cooley, A., Nexon, D., & Ward, S. (2019). Revising order or challenging the balance of military power? An alternative typology of revisionist and status-quo states. Review of International Studies, 45(04), 689–708. doi:10.1017/S0260210519000019
  • De Castro, R. C. (2022). Under the shadow of the giants: The ASEAN in search of a common strategy in a fluid and perilous Indo-Pacific region. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(2), 282–301. doi:10.1177/20578911211014598
  • De Graaff, N., & Van Apeldoorn, B. (2018). US–China relations and the liberal world order: Contending elites, colliding visions? International Affairs, 94(1), 113–131. doi:10.1093/ia/iix232
  • Doyle, T., & Rumley, D. (2019). The rise and return of the Indo-Pacific. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Emmers, R. (2018). Unpacking ASEAN neutrality: The quest for autonomy and impartiality in Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 40(3), 349–370. doi:10.1355/cs40-3a
  • Envall, H. D. P., & Wilkins, T. S. (2022). Japan and the new Indo-Pacific order: The rise of an entrepreneurial power. The Pacific Review, 1–32. doi:10.1080/09512748.2022.2033820
  • Eun, Y.-S. (2022). Reflection and implication: Methodology and theorising. The Pacific Review, 35(2), 368–381. doi:10.1080/09512748.2021.1998201
  • Eun, Y.-S., Acharya, A., & na Thalang, C. (2022). Unpacking the dynamics of weak states’ agency. The Pacific Review, 35(2), 229–244. doi:10.1080/09512748.2021.1998200
  • Ferdinand, P. (2016). Westward Ho—The China dream and ‘one belt, one road’. International Affairs, 92(4), 941–957. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12660
  • Gilley, B., & O’Neil, A. (2014). China’s Rise through the prism of middle powers. In B. Gilley & A. O’Neil (Eds.), Middle powers and the rise of China (pp. 1–22). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
  • Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Glaser, B. S., & Medeiros, E. S. (2007). The changing ecology of foreign policy-making in China: The ascension and demise of the theory of “peaceful rise”. The China Quarterly, 190, 291–310. doi:10.1017/S0305741007001208
  • Gould, H. D. (1998). What is at state in the agent-structure debate?. In V. Kubálková, P. Kowert, & N. Onuf (Eds.), International relations in a constructed world (pp. 79–98). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  • Guilfoyle, D. (2019). The rule of law and maritime security: Understanding lawfare in the South China sea. International Affairs, 95(5), 999–1017. doi:10.1093/ia/iiz141
  • He, K., & Feng, H. (2020). The institutionalization of the Indo-Pacific: Problems and prospects. International Affairs, 96(1), 149–168. doi:10.1093/ia/iiz194
  • He, K., Feng, H., Chan, S., & Hu, W. (2021). Rethinking revisionism in world politics. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 14(2), 159–186. doi:10.1093/cjip/poab004
  • Heyd, T. (2021). Covid-19 and climate change in the times of the anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review, 8(1), 21–36. doi:10.1177/2053019620961799
  • Heydarian, R. J. (2017). Tragedy of small power politics: Duterte and the shifting sands of Philippine foreign policy. Asian Security, 13(3), 220–236. doi:10.1080/14799855.2017.1354569
  • Heydarian, R. J. (2018). Mare Liberum: Aquino, Duterte, and The Philippines’ evolving lawfare strategy in the South China sea. Asian Politics & Policy, 10(2), 283–299. doi:10.1111/aspp.12392
  • Heydarian, R. J. (2022, June 28). Philippines-China energy sharing dead in the water. Asia Times. Retrieved from https://asiatimes.com/2022/06/philippines-china-energy-sharing-dead-in-the-water/.
  • Hong, Y.-P. (2011). North Korea’s strategic culture and threat perception: Implications for regional security cooperation. Korea Observer, 42(1), 95–115.
  • Hosoya, Y. (2019). FOIP 2.0: The evolution of Japan’s free and open Indo-Pacific strategy. Asia-Pacific Review, 26(1), 18–28. doi:10.1080/13439006.2019.1622868
  • Hsiao, A. H.-A. (2016). China and the South China sea “lawfare”. Issues & Studies, 52(02), 1650008–1650042. doi:10.1142/S1013251116500089
  • Huang, R. L., & Tan, A. T. H. (2019). The Taiwan issue: Tracing 70 years of Taiwan-China relations. In B. Schreer, & A. T. H. Tan (Eds.), The Taiwan issue: Problems and prospects (pp. 58–72). London: Routledge.
  • Hughes, C. W. (2016). Japan’s ‘resentful realism’ and balancing China’s rise. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 9(2), 109–150. doi:10.1093/cjip/pow004
  • Hunzeker, M. A., Lanoszka, A., Davis, B., Fay, M., Goepner, E., Petrucelli, J., & Seng-White, E. (2018). A question of time: Enhancing Taiwan’s conventional deterrence posture. Arlington: Center for Security Policy Studies, George Mason University.
  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2019). Reflections on after victory. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(1), 5–19. doi:10.1177/1369148118791402
  • Insisa, A., & Pugliese, G. (2022). The free and open Indo-Pacific versus the belt and road: Spheres of influence and Sino-Japanese relations. The Pacific Review, 35(3), 557–585. doi:10.1080/09512748.2020.1862899
  • Kiglics, B. (2022). Japan’s Asia–Pacific diplomacy in the twenty-first century: Empty rhetoric or a new paradigm?. In R. G. Patman, P. Köllner, & B. Kiglics (Eds.), From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific: Diplomacy in a contested region (pp. 115–142). Singapore: Springer.
  • Kim, B. (2016). North Korea’s siege mentality: A sociopolitical analysis of the Kim Jong-un regime’s foreign policies. Asian Perspective, 40(2), 223–243. doi:10.1353/apr.2016.0010
  • Kim, S. C. (2017). North Korea’s nuclear doctrine and revisionist strategy. In S. C. Kim & M. D. Cohen (Eds.), North Korea and nuclear weapons: Entering the new era of deterrence (pp. 43–66). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  • Kim, W. (2015). Rising China, pivotal middle power South Korea, and alliance transition theory. International Area Studies Review, 18(3), 251–265. doi:10.1177/2233865915595531
  • Kliem, F. (2020). Why Quasi-Alliances will persist in the Indo-Pacific? The fall and rise of the quad. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 7(3), 271–304. doi:10.1177/2347797020962620
  • Knomea. (2021). GDP based on PPP by country, 2020. Retrieved from https://knoema.com//atlas/ranks/GDP-based-on-PPP?baseRegion=CN.
  • Koga, K. (2020). Japan’s ‘Indo-Pacific’ question: Countering China or shaping a new regional order? International Affairs, 96(1), 49–73. doi:10.1093/ia/iiz241
  • Kornprobst, M., & Paul, T. V. (2021). Introduction: Globalization, deglobalization and the liberal international order. International Affairs, 97(5), 1305–1316. doi:10.1093/ia/iiab120
  • Köllner, P., Patman, R. G., & Kiglics, B. (2022). From Asia–Pacific to Indo-Pacific: Diplomacy in an emerging strategic space. In R. G. Patman, P. Köllner, & B. Kiglics (Eds.), From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific: Diplomacy in a contested region (pp. 1–27). Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7007-7_1
  • Kraft, H. J. S. (2017). Great power dynamics and the waning of ASEAN centrality in regional security. Asian Politics & Policy, 9(4), 597–612. doi:10.1111/aspp.12350
  • Krebs, R. R., & Jackson, P. T. (2007). Twisting tongues and twisting arms: The power of political rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 35–66. doi:10.1177/1354066107074284
  • Lake, D. A., Martin, L. L., & Risse, T. (2021). Challenges to the liberal order: Reflections on international organization. International Organization, 75(2), 225–257. doi:10.1017/S0020818320000636
  • Lee, J. (2020). Taiwan, chips, and geopolitics: Part 1. Retrieved May 24, 2022, from https://thediplomat.com/2020/12/taiwan-chips-and-geopolitics-part-1/.
  • Liff, A. P. (2019). Unambivalent alignment: Japan’s China strategy, the US alliance, and the ‘hedging’ fallacy. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(3), 453–491. doi:10.1093/irap/lcz015
  • Long, T. (2017). Small states, great power? Gaining influence through intrinsic, derivative, and collective power. International Studies Review, 19(2), 185–205. doi:10.1093/isr/viw040
  • Long, T. (2022). A small state’s guide to influence in world politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Manantan, M. B. F. (2019). Pivot toward China: A critical analysis of the Philippines’ policy shift on the South China sea disputes. Asian Politics & Policy, 11(4), 643–662. doi:10.1111/aspp.12498
  • Medcalf, R. (2018). Reimagining Asia: From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific. In G. Rozman & J. C. Liow (Eds.), International relations and Asia’s Southern tier: ASEAN, Australia, and India (pp. 9–28). Singapore: Springer.
  • Modelski, G. (1987). Long cycles in world politics. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Modelski, G., & Thompson, W. R. (1989). Long cycles and global war. In M. I. Midlarsky (Ed.), Handbook of war studies (pp. 23–54). Boston: Unwin Hyman.
  • Murray, W. S. (2014). Asymmetric options for Taiwan’s deterrence and defense. In M. M. Chu & S. L. Kastner (Eds.), Globalization and security relations across the Taiwan Strait: In the shadow of China (pp. 61–79). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Narang, V. (2015). Nuclear strategies of emerging nuclear powers: North Korea and Iran. The Washington Quarterly, 38(1), 73–91. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2015.1038175
  • Norrlof, C., & Reich, S. (2015). American and Chinese leadership during the global financial crisis: Testing Kindleberger’s stabilization functions. International Area Studies Review, 18(3), 227–250. doi:10.1177/2233865915573638
  • Organski, A. F. K. (1958). World politics (1st ed.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Organski, A. F. K., & Kugler, J. (1980). The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Roberts, C. B. (2016). The ‘South Sea’ and ASEAN: Failing unity amidst Beijing’s duplicitous diplomacy. Maritime Issues. Retrieved from http://www.maritimeissues.com/uploaded/HT%20%C3%9AC%202016/SCS%20and%20ASEAN.pdf.
  • Satake, T., & Sahashi, R. (2021). The rise of China and Japan’s ‘vision’ for free and open Indo-Pacific. Journal of Contemporary China, 30(127), 18–35. doi:10.1080/10670564.2020.1766907
  • Schweller, R. L. (2009). Neoclassical realism and state mobilization: Expansionist ideology in the age of mass politics. In J. W. Taliaferro, N. M. Ripsman, & S. E. Lobell (Eds.), Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy (pp. 227–250). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shattuck, T. J. (2021). Stuck in the middle: Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, the U.S.-China tech fight, and cross-strait stability. Orbis, 65(1), 101–117. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2020.11.005
  • SIPRI. (2021). SIPRI military expenditure database. Retrieved from https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex.
  • Stuart, D., Petersen, B., & Gunderson, R. (2022). Shared pretenses for collective inaction: The economic growth imperative, COVID-19, and climate change. Globalizations, 19(3), 408–425. doi:10.1080/14747731.2021.1943897
  • Tan, S. S. (2017). Rethinking ‘ASEAN centrality’ in the regional governance of East Asia. The Singapore Economic Review, 62(03), 721–740. doi:10.1142/S0217590818400076
  • Tan, S. S. (2020). Consigned to hedge: South-East Asia and America’s ‘free and open indo-pacific’ strategy. International Affairs, 96(1), 131–148. doi:10.1093/ia/iiz227
  • Tang, C.-M. (2021). Power, international law, and the Philippine hedging strategy in the South China Sea. In Y.-J. Hwang & E. Frettingham (Eds.), Maritime and territorial disputes in the South China Sea: faces of power and law in the age of China’s rise (pp. 91–115). London: Routledge.
  • Taliaferro, J. W. (2009). Neoclassical realism and resource extraction: State building for future war. In J. W. Taliaferro, N. M. Ripsman, & S. E. Lobell (Eds.), Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy (pp. 194–226). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Taliaferro, J. W., Lobell, S. E., & Ripsman, N. M. (2009). Introduction: Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. In J. W. Taliaferro, N. M. Ripsman, & S. E. Lobell (Eds.), Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy (pp. 1–41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Taylor, B. (2019). Dangerous decade: Taiwan’s security and crisis management. London: Routledge.
  • Tourinho, M. (2021). The co-constitution of order. International Organization, 75(2), 258–281. doi:10.1017/S0020818320000466
  • Venzon, C. (2022, June 29). Duterte’s controversial legacy: Making Philippine strongmen “cool.” Nikkei Asia. Retrieved from https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Duterte-s-controversial-legacy-Making-Philippine-strongmen-cool.
  • Volpe, T. (2017). The unraveling of North Korea’s proliferation blackmail strategy. In S. C. Kim & M. D. Cohen (Eds.), North Korea and nuclear weapons: Entering the new era of deterrence (pp. 85–100). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  • Wang, F.-L. (2017). Between the bomb and the United States: China faces the nuclear North Korea. In S. C. Kim & M. D. Cohen (Eds.), North Korea and nuclear weapons: Entering the new era of deterrence (pp. 169–190). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  • Wang, Z. (2015). Chinese discourse on the “nine-dashed line”: Rights, interests, and nationalism. Asian Survey, 55(3), 502–524. doi:10.1525/as.2015.55.3.502
  • Ward, S. (2017). Status and the challenge of rising powers: Obstructed ambitions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weiss, J. C., & Wallace, J. L. (2021). Domestic politics, China’s rise, and the future of the liberal international order. International Organization, 75(2), 635–664. doi:10.1017/S002081832000048X
  • Wendt, A. E. (1987). The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization, 41(3), 335–370. doi:10.1017/S002081830002751X
  • Wight, C. (2006). Agents, structures and international relations: Politics as ontology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilkins, T., & Kim, J. (2022). Adoption, accommodation or opposition? Regional powers respond to American-led Indo-Pacific strategy. The Pacific Review, 35(3), 415–445. doi:10.1080/09512748.2020.1825516
  • Woo, S. (2011). Pyongyang and the World: North Korean perspectives on international relations under Kim Jong-il. Pacific Focus, 26(2), 188–205. doi:10.1111/j.1976-5118.2011.01062.x
  • World Bank. (2021a). Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, Current US$). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD.
  • World Bank. (2021b). Trade: Merchandise exports (current US$). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/topic/trade?most_recent_value_desc=true.
  • Wu, S.-S. (2019). Taiwan’s armed forces: Development and prospects. In B. Schreer, & A. T. H. Tan (Eds.), The Taiwan issue: Problems and prospects (pp. 156–173). London: Routledge.
  • Yilmaz, S., & Liu, F.-K. (2019). The evolving geopolitical landscape in the post-arbitration South China sea. Pacific Focus, 34(3), 317–344. doi:10.1111/pafo.12151
  • Yu, H. (2017). Motivation behind China’s ‘One belt, one road’ initiatives and establishment of the Asian infrastructure investment bank. Journal of Contemporary China, 26(105), 353–368. doi:10.1080/10670564.2016.1245894
  • Zheng, B. (2005). China’s peaceful rise: Speeches of Zheng Bijian 1997–2005. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.