Constrained, competing and eking – the limits of economic statecraft in East Asia after national development

References

• Alami, I., Dixon, A. D., & Mawdsley, E. (2021). State capitalism and the new global D/development regime. Antipode, 53(5), 1294–1318. doi:10.1111/anti.12725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsden, A. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D. (2020). Economic statecraft. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernards, N., & Soederberg, S. (2021). Relative surplus populations and the crises of contemporary capitalism: Reviving, revisiting, recasting. Geoforum, 126, 412–419. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammack, P., & Cammack, P. (2019). The OECD and the world market: antecedents of deep marketization AU. Globalizations, 16(6), 804–818. doi:10.1080/14747731.2018.1560184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, T., & Jarvis, D. S. (2017a). Disembedding autonomy: Asia after the developmental state. In T. Carroll & D. Jarvis (Eds.), Asia after the developmental state: Disembedding autonomy (pp. 3–50). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, T. (2017a). Capitalism, contradiction and the onward march of variegated neoliberalism in Southeast Asia. In R. Westra (Ed.), The political economy of emerging markets: Varieties of BRICS in the age of global crises and austerity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, T. (2017b). Late capitalism and the shift from the ‘developmental state’ to the variegated market state. In T. Carroll & D. Jarvis (Eds.), Asia after the developmental state: Disembedding autonomy (pp. 93–123). Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, T. (2020). The political economy of Southeast Asia’s development (pp. 35–84). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, T., Gonzalez-Vicente, R., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (2019). Capital, conflict and convergence: a political understanding of neoliberalism and its relationship to capitalist transformation. Globalizations, 16(6), 778–803. doi:10.1080/14747731.2018.1560183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. G. (2016). In the shadow of ordoliberalism: the paradox of neoliberalism in the 21st century. ERIS – European Review of International Studies, 3(1), 78–92. doi:10.3224/eris.v3i1.5
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, J., & Lee, K.-K. (2006). The effects of neoloiberal "reforms" on the postcrisis Korean economy. Review of Radical Political Economics, 38(3), 381–387. doi:10.1177/0486613406290903
   Google Scholar
• European Union Chamber of Commerce in China. (2017). China manufacturing 2025 - putting industrial policy ahead of makret forces. European Union Chamber of Commerce in China.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1979). Dependent development. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felker, G. (2012). Post-national industrialization in Southeast Asia: Dynamics and origins. In M. A. M. Sani, M. M. M. A. Malek, & A. e. Hara (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on International Studies 2012: Managing national and regional transformation and its global challenges (pp. 52–69). NP.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. G. (1969). Latin America: Underdevelopment or revolution, essays on the development of underdevelopment and the immediate enemy. Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G. (1978). Drug firms and dependency in Mexico: The case of the steroid hormone industry. International Organization, 32(1), 237–286. doi:10.1017/S002081830000391X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G. (1994). The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: How U.S. retailers shape overseas production networks. In G. Gereffi & M. Korzeniewicz (Eds.), Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism (pp. 95–122). Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G. (2014). Global value chains in a post-Washington consensus world. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 9–37. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.756414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, E. T. (2009). The rise and fall of capital: Corporate Malaysia in historical perspective. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 39(3), 345–381. doi:10.1080/00472330902944404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Vicente, R., & Carroll, T. (2017). Politics after national development: Explaining the populist rise under late capitalism. Globalizations, 14(6), 991–1013. doi:10.1080/14747731.2017.1316542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guild, J. (2023). The Indonesian state and the strategic use of foreign capital. Pacific Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2020). Theorising political economy in Southeast Asia. In T. Carroll, S. Hameiri, & L. Jones (Eds.), The political economy of Southeast Asia - Politics and uneven development under hyperglobalisation (pp. 3–34). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton-Hart, N. (2017). Opting for openness: Capital mobility and monetary sterilisation in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(2), 171–198. doi:10.1080/00472336.2016.1257045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. (1994). Age of extremes, the short twentieth century, 1914-1991. Michael Joseph.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, D. (2017). The state and development in Malaysia: Race, class and markets. In T. Carroll & D. Jarvis (Eds.), Disembedding autonomy: Asia after the developmental state (pp. 201–236). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. (2001). Globalization and the changing architecture of the state: the regulatory state and the politics of negative co-ordination. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(1), 101–123. doi:10.1080/1350176001001859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. (2004). Southeast Asia’s embedded mercantilism in crisis: International strategies and domestic coalitions. In R. C. Thakur & E. Newman (Eds.), Broadening Asia’s security discourse and agenda: Political, social, and environmental perspectives (pp. 47–71). United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jinping, X. (2017). Full text of Xi Jinping keynote at the world economic forum. CGTN, Retrieved May 5, 2017, from https://america.cgtn.com/2017/01/17/full-text-of-xi-jinping-keynote-at-the-world-economic-forum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle - The growth of industrial policy, 1925-1975. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H.-R. (2000). Fragility or continuity? Economic governance of East Asian capitalism. In R. Robison, M. Beeson, K. Jayasuriya, & H.-R. Kim (Eds.), Politics and markets in the wake of the Asian crisis (pp. 99–115). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. T. (1999). Neoliberalism and the decline of the developmental state. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 29(4), 441–461. doi:10.1080/00472339980000231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. (2015). Labor after neoliberalism: The birth of the insecure class in South Korea. Globalizations, 12(2), 184–202. doi:10.1080/14747731.2014.935087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. (2010). To make live or let die? Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations. Antipode, 41, 66–93. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00717.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1993). Institutions and credible commitment. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 149(1), 11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). OECD economic surveys: Korea 2014. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). Economic surveys Korea. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• PRC State Council. (2015). Made in China 2025 (English translation). Translated by Inc. Etcetera Language Group. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, Georgetown University.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. (2021). Economic statecraft with Chinese characteristics: Strange, new, and different, or old wine in new bottles? Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 50(3), 267–293. doi:10.1177/18681026211061750
   Google Scholar
• Robison, R. (1986). Indonesia: The rise of capital. Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Robison, R. (2001). Indonesia: Crisis, oligarchy and reform. In G. Rodan, K. Hewison, & R. Robison (Eds.), The political economy of South-East Asia (2nd ed., pp. 104–137). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415. doi:10.1017/S0020818300018993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenberger, E. (1988). From Fordism to flexible accumulation: technology, competitive strategies, and international location. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 6(3), 245–262. doi:10.1068/d060245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu, K. (2021). The ASEAN economic community and the RCEP in the world economy. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 10(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/24761028.2021.1907881
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, R. (1989). Geopolitics and the political economy of Southeast Asia. International Journal, 44(3), 517–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbs, R. (2009). What ever happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The unfolding debate. The Pacific Review, 22(1), 1–22. doi:10.1080/09512740802650971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, J. (2021). Cycles of accumulation and industrial slowdown in Malaysia: Rents, social forces and the political settlement. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 51(2), 303–329. doi:10.1080/00472336.2020.1766098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, Y. (2022). Disaggregating China, Inc. Ithaca Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• To, Y. (2022). Contested development in China’s transition to an innovation-driven economy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2018). Trade and development report 2018 - power, platforms and the free trade delusion. UNCTAD.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warburton, E. (2017). Resource nationalism in post-boom Indonesia: The new normal? Lowy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, B. (1980). Imperialism: Pioneer of capitalism. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, I. (2014). Green growth, neoliberalism and conflicting hegemonic interests: The case of Korea. International Critical Thought, 4(1), 53–66. doi:10.1080/21598282.2014.878149
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. (2012). The myth of the neoliberal state. In K.-S. Chang, L. Weiss, & B. Fine (Eds.), Developmental politics in transition: The neoliberal era and beyond. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L., & Thurbon, E. (2021). Developmental state or economic statecraft? Where, why and how the difference matters. New Political Economy, 26(3), 472–489. doi:10.1080/13563467.2020.1766431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo-Cumings, M. (1999). The developmental state. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020 - Trading for development in the age of global value chains. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2021). Malaysia - overview. World Bank. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/malaysia/overview.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. (2017). Trade policy review, Malaysia. WTO.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. (2020). Trade policy review, Indonesia. WTO.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. (2021a). Trade policy review, China. WTO.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. (2021b). Trade policy review, Republic of Korea. WTO.
   Google Scholar