Sovereignty scripts and regional governance: ASEAN’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic

References

• Acharya, A. (2009). Whose ideas matter?: Agency and power in asian regionalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2016). Regionalism beyond EU-centrism. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 109–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R. (2013). Sovereignty: The state’s symbolic power and transnational fields. In R. Adler-Nissen (Ed.), Bourdieu in international relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR (pp. 179–192). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amaya, A., Rollet, V., & Kingah, S. (2015). What’s in a word? The framing of health at the regional level: ASEAN, EU, SADC and UNASUR. Global Social Policy, 15(3), 229–260. doi:10.1177/1468018115599816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The ASEAN. (2021a). Viewpoint: Budi G. Sadikin, Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. August-September 2021, 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• The ASEAN. (2021b). Covid-19 vaccine tracker: Where are ASEAN’s vaccines coming from?. August–September 2021, 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (2019, November 2). ASEAN leaders’ declaration on ASEAN vaccine security and self-reliance (AVSSR). Retrieved from https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/7-ASEAN-Leaders-Declaration-on-ASEAN-Vaccine-Security-and-Self-Reliance-AVSSR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat. (2020a, February 4). ASEAN Plus Three senior health officials reaffirm cooperation to stop spread of 2019-nCoV. Retrieved from https://asean.org/asean-plus-three-senior-health-officials-reaffirm-cooperation-to-stop-spread-of-2019-ncov/.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat. (2020b, February 15). Chairman’s Statement on ASEAN Collective Response to the Outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019. Retrieved from https://asean.org/chairmans-statement-on-asean-collective-response-to-the-outbreak-of-coronavirus-disease-2019-2/.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat. (2020c, April 14). Declaration of the Special ASEAN Summit on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Retrieved from https://asean.org/declaration-of-the-special-asean-summit-on-coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat. (2020e, November 12). Chairman’s Statement of the 37th ASEAN Summit. Retrieved from https://asean.org/chairmans-statement-of-the-37th-asean-summit/.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat (2021a, July 22). Joint Statement: 2021 Special Video Conference of the ASEAN Health Ministers on ASEAN Covid-19 Response after One Year. Retrieved from https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Adopted_Joint-Statement-2021-SVC-AHMM-on-COVID-19.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat (2021b, October 26). Chairman’s Statement of the 38th and 39th ASEAN Summits. Retrieved from https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/FINAL-Chairmans-Statement-of-the-38th-and-39th-ASEAN-Summits-26-Oct….pdf
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat (2022, May 14). Joint Statement, 15th ASEAN Health Ministers Meeting. Retrieved from https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/3.-15th-AHMM_Joint-Statement_Clean_During-Meeting_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat (n.d.-a). Terms of Reference: ASEAN Regional Reserve of Medical Supplies for Public Health Emergencies. Retrieved from https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/54-Finalised-and-APPROVED-TOR_ASEAN-Regional-Reserve-for-Medical-Supplies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat (n.d.-b). Terms of Reference: The Covid-19 ASEAN Response Fund. Retrieved from https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/53-Finalised-and-APPROVED-TOR_COVID-19-ASEAN-Response-Fund.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Vietnam Information Portal (2020, June 23). ASEAN officials discuss preparations for upcoming activities. Retrieved from https://aseanvietnam.vn/en/post/asean-officials-discuss-preparations-for-upcoming-activities.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, R. K. (1988). Untying the sovereign state: A double reading of the anarchy problematique. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 227–262. doi:10.1177/03058298880170020901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoob, M. (Ed.) (1986). Regional security and the third world. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (1999). The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, 53(4), 699–732. doi:10.1162/002081899551048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, A. J., & Beeson, M. (2010). The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: Can ASEAN reconcile humanitarianism and sovereignty? Asian Security, 6(3), 262–279. doi:10.1080/14799855.2010.507414
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, A. J., & Drummond, C. (2011). The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: Between non-interference and sovereignty as responsibility. The Pacific Review, 24(2), 179–200. doi:10.1080/09512748.2011.560958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boli, J. (2001). Sovereignty from a world polity perspective. In S. D. Krasner (Ed.), Problematic sovereignty: Contested rules and political possibilities (pp. 53–82). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero-Anthony, M. (2005). Regional security in Southeast Asia: Beyond the ASEAN way. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero-Anthony, M. (2008). Non-traditional security and infectious diseases in ASEAN: Going beyond the rhetoric of securitization to deeper institutionalization. Pacific Review, 21(4), 507–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caballero-Anthony, M. (2018). Negotiating governance on non-traditional security in Southeast Asia and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. (1992). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, B. N. (2019). Sovereignty in the South: Intrusive regionalism in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desierto, D. A. (2011). ASEAN’s constitutionalization of international law: Challenges to evolution under the new ASEAN charter. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 49(2), 268–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2002). A human right to health? Third World Quarterly, 23(2), 197–215. doi:10.1080/01436590220126595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidler, D. P. (2008). Influenza virus samples, international law, and global health diplomacy. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 14(1), 88–94. doi:10.3201/eid1401.070700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, G. (1984). The standard of ‘civilization’ in international society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, J. (2021). Contesting sovereignty: Power and practice in Africa and Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. (1961). International integration: The European and the universal process. International Organization, 15(3), 366–392. doi:10.1017/S0020818300002198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haacke, J. (2003). ASEAN’s diplomatic and security culture: Origins, development and prospects. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2015). Governing borderless threats: Non-traditional security and the politics of state transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. (1999). Reassessing ASEAN. Adelphi Paper 328. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heydarian, R. J. (2020, April 8). The wrong way to do a lockdown in the Philippines. Asia Times. Retrieved from https://asiatimes.com/2020/04/the-wrong-way-to-do-a-lockdown-in-the-philippines/.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., &Marks, G. (2009). A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. 10.1017/S0007123408000409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabko, N., & Luhman, M. (2019). Reconfiguring sovereignty: Crisis, politicization, and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7), 1037–1055. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1619190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JAIF [Japan-ASEAN Integration Fund]. (2021, November 30). Detailed Design and Preparation Support for the “ASEAN Centre for Public Health Emergencies and Emerging Diseases”. Retrieved from https://jaif.asean.org/project-brief/detailed-design-and-preparation-support-for-the-asean-centre-for-public-health-emergencies-and-emerging-diseases/.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. (2009). Regulatory regionalism in the Asia-Pacific: Drivers, instruments and actors. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 63(3), 335–347. doi:10.1080/10357710903104810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, A. (2012). The improvised state: Sovereignty, performance and agency in Dayton Bosnia. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jetschke, A. (2009). Institutionalizing ASEAN: Celebrating Europe though network governance. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3), 407–426. doi:10.1080/09557570903107688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., & Smith, M. L. R. (2007). Making process, not progress: ASEAN and the evolving East Asian regional order. International Security, 32(1), 148–184. doi:10.1162/isec.2007.32.1.148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. (2012). ASEAN, Sovereignty and Intervention in Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L., & Hameiri, S. (2020). Southeast Asian regional governance: Political economy, regulatory regionalism and ASEAN integration. In T. Carroll, S. Hameiri, & L. Jones (Eds.), The political economy of Southeast Asia: Politics and uneven development under hyperglobalization (4th ed., pp. 199–224). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen-Dahl, A. (1982). Regional organization and order in South-East Asia. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kashyap, S., & Bhattacharya, A. (2021, November 12). ASEAN’s divided response to COVID-19. East Asia Forum. Retrieved from https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2021/11/12/aseans-divided-response-to-covid-19/.
   Google Scholar
• Khalik, S. (2021, May 24). How Singapore picked its Covid-19 vaccines. The Straits Times Singapore. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/how-singapore-picked-its-covid-19-vaccines.
   Google Scholar
• Kliem, F. (2020, May 21). Leveraging ASEAN to respond to COVID-19. East Asia Forum. Retrieved from https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2020/05/21/leveraging-asean-to-respond-to-covid-19/.
   Google Scholar
• Koga, K. (2022). Countering emerging infectious diseases and COVID-19: The development of ASEAN’s institutional arrangements and international cooperation. In A. P. van der Veere, F. Schneider, & C. Y.-p. Lo (Eds.), Public health in Asia during the COVID-19 pandemic: Global health governance, migrant labour, and international health crises (pp. 45–61). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurki, M. (2008). Causation in international relations: Reclaiming causal analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamy, M., & Phua, K. H. (2012). Southeast Asian cooperation in health: A comparative perspective on regional health governance in ASEAN and the EU. EU Centre Policy Brief No. 4, June 2012. Singapore: EU Centre in Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, T., Krösche, N., & Schirmer, S. (2019). Regional cooperation and the legitimacy of national sovereignty. Paper presented at the pre-ISA workshop “Legitimacy in Global Governance, Toronto, 26 March.
   Google Scholar
• Linsenmaier, T., Schmidt, D., & Spandler, K. (2021). On the meaning(s) of norms: Ambiguity and global governance in a post-hegemonic world. Review of International Studies, 47(4), 508–527. doi:10.1017/S0260210521000371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly, T. T. H. (2020, June 3). ASEAN struggles to be effective in its COVID-19 response. Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. Retrieved from https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/asean-struggles-be-effective-its-covid-19-response.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, M. H. (1994). Gender and new regionalism in Latin America: Inclusion/exclusion. Third World Quarterly, 15(1), 63–76. doi:10.1080/01436599408420364
   Google Scholar
• Maier-Knapp, N. (2011). Regional and interregional integrative dynamics of ASEAN and EU in response to the avian influenza. Asia Europe Journal, 8(4), 541–554. doi:10.1007/s10308-011-0289-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maude, R., & Fraser, D. (2022). Chinese diplomacy in Southeast Asia during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assessing China’s practice of diplomacy in the region throughout 2020 and 2021. New York: Asia Society Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McFaul, M. (2001). The sovereignty script: Red book for Russian revolutionaries. In S. D. Krasner (Ed.), Problematic sovereignty: Contested rules and political possibilities (pp. 194–223). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. (1997). World society and nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181. doi:10.1086/231174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, A., & Kasim, S. M .y (2018). Beyond sovereignty: Non-western international relations in Malaysia’s foreign relations. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 40(3), 371–396. doi:10.1355/cs40-3b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, A. (1992). The European rescue of the nation-state. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narine, S. (2005). Humanitarian intervention and the question of sovereignty. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 4(3), 465–485. doi:10.1163/156915005775093340
   Google Scholar
• Nodzenski, M., Phua, K. H., Heng, Y. K., & Pang, T. (2016). Shaping norms for health governance in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Global Health Governance, 10(2), 92–106.
   Google Scholar
• Omar, R., & Zengeni, K. T. (2022). Implications of the Covid-19 global health pandemic on ASEAN’s security community. In R. K. Gunaratna & M. M. Aslam (Eds.), COVID-19 pandemic: The threat and response (pp. 129–146). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V. (2013). Methodology: Putting practice theory into practice. In R. Adler-Nissen (Ed.), Bourdieu in international relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR (pp. 45–58). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V., & Mérand, F. (2013). Bourdieu’s concepts: Political sociology in international relations. In R. Adler-Nissen (Ed.), Bourdieu in international relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR (pp. 24–44). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prayut, C. (2020, September 25). Statement at the General Debate of the 75th Session of the United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved from https://www.mfa.go.th/en/content/1592020.
   Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, C. (1999). The moral purpose of the state: Culture, social identity, and institutional rationality in international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rüland, J. (2021). Covid-19 and ASEAN: Strengthening statecentrism, eroding inclusiveness, testing cohesion. The International Spectator, 56(2), 72–92. doi:10.1080/03932729.2021.1893058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian, L. C., & Lanti, I. G. (2010). Perceiving Indonesian approaches to international relations theory. In A. Acharya & B. Buzan (Eds.), Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia (pp. 148–173). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Siahaan, G. S. (2021, January 5). Southeast Asia’s Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Australian Outlook, Australian Institute of International Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/southeast-asias-responses-to-the-covid-19-pandemic/.
   Google Scholar
• Söderbaum, F. (2004). Modes of regional governance in Africa: Neoliberalism, sovereignty boosting, and shadow networks. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 10(4), 419–436. doi:10.1163/19426720-01004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderbaum, F., & Spandler, K. (2020). Why cooperate? National sovereignty narratives and regionalism. Paper presented at the IR Section Conference of the German Political Science Association (DVPW), Freiburg, 7–9 October.
   Google Scholar
• Southgate, L. (2019). ASEAN resistance to sovereignty violation: Interests, balancing and the role of the vanguard state. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M. A., & Cooper, A. F. (2009). Overcoming constraints of state sovereignty: Global health governance in Asia. Third World Quarterly, 30(7), 1379–1394. doi:10.1080/01436590903152686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulaiman, Y., Delanova, M., & Jati, R. (2021). Indonesia between the United States and China in a post-Covid-19 world order. Asia Policy, 28(1), 155–178. doi:10.1353/asp.2021.0007
   Google Scholar
• Sylvester, C. (2004). Feminist international relations: An unfinished journey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tadjbakhsh, S. (2010). International relations theory and the Islamic worldview. In A. Acharya & B. Buzan (Eds.), Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia (pp. 174–196). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S. S. (2011). Providers not protectors: Institutionalising responsible sovereignty in Southeast Asia. Asian Security, 7(3), 201–217. doi:10.1080/14799855.2011.615081
   Google Scholar
• Tay, S. C. (2008). The ASEAN Charter: Between national sovereignty and the region’s constitutional moment. Singapore Year Book of International Law, 12, 151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Thai PBS World (2021, August 4). ASEAN to procure 10 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines under COVAX program. Retrieved from https://www.thaipbsworld.com/asean-to-procure-10-million-doses-of-covid-19-vaccines-under-covax-program/.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, R. (2002). Intervention, sovereignty and the responsibility to protect: Experiences from ICISS. Security Dialogue, 33(3), 323–340. doi:10.1177/0967010602033003007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsjeng, H. Z. (2020, March 17). Pandemic control: A new area for ASEAN defense cooperation? The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2020/03/pandemic-control-a-new-area-for-asean-defense-cooperation/.
   Google Scholar
• Turton, S. (2021, May 20). Cambodia’s Hun Sen: ‘If I don’t rely on China, who will I rely on?’ Nikkei Asia. Retrieved from https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/The-Future-of-Asia/The-Future-of-Asia-2021/Cambodia-s-Hun-Sen-If-I-don-t-rely-on-China-who-will-I-rely-on.
   Google Scholar
• Verwej, M., Douglas, M., Ellis, R., Engel, C., Hendriks, F., Lohmann, S., … Thompson, M. (2011). The case for clumsiness. In Verwej, M. & Thompson, M. (Eds.), Clumsy solutions for a complex world: Governance, politics, and plural perceptions (pp. 1–27). Bangstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Voeten, E. (2019). Making sense of the design of international institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 147–163. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-041916-021108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vietnam News Agency (2021, September 27). Vietnam attends meeting of ACC working group on public health emergencies. Retrieved from https://ncov.vnanet.vn/en/news/vietnam-attends-meeting-of-acc-working-group-on-public-health-emergencies/fbc7ab26-7c72-4360-82fa-0fdd963a15ab.
   Google Scholar
• Wanandi, Y. (2020, March 16). ASEAN-China cooperation in time of COVID-19 pandemic. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from https://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2020/03/16/asean-china-cooperation-in-time-of-covid-19-pandemic.html.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. (1998). Performative states. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 27(1), 77–95. doi:10.1177/03058298980270011101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woertz, E., & Yellinek, R. (2021, April 14). Vaccine diplomacy in the MENA region. Middle East Institute. Retrieved from https://www.mei.edu/publications/vaccine-diplomacy-mena-region.
   Google Scholar
• Yingi, E., & Hlungwani, P. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic and regional integration in Africa: Implications of the responses from ECOWAS and SADC. South African Journal of International Affairs, 29(2), 227–241. doi:10.1080/10220461.2022.2099457
   Google Scholar
• Yukawa, T. (2018). The ASEAN Way as a symbol: An analysis of discourses on the ASEAN norms. The Pacific Review, 31(3), 298–314. doi:10.1080/09512748.2017.1371211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaini, K. (2021, June 24). China’s Vaccine Diplomacy in Southeast Asia – A Mixed Record. ISEAS Perspective 86. Retrieved from https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/ISEAS_Perspective_2021_86.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zaini, K., & Ha, H. T. (2021, September 1). Understanding the selective hesitancy towards Chinese vaccines in Southeast Asia. ISEAS Perspective 115. Retrieved from https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ISEAS_Perspective_2021_115.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M., & Gerschewski, J. (2021). Sketching the liberal script. A target of contestations. SCRIPTS Working Paper 10. Retrieved from https://www.scripts-berlin.eu/publications/working-paper-series/Working-Paper-No_-10-2021/SCRIPTS_Working_Paper_10_WEB.pdf.
   Google Scholar