Middle powers as ‘peacemaking entrepreneurs’ in Myanmar’s peace process 2011–2021

References

• Abbondanza, G. (2021). Australia the ‘good international citizen’? The limits of a traditional middle power. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 75(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1831436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandarage, A. (2011). The “Norwegian model”: Political economy of NGO peacemaking. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 17(2), 221–242. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24590809?seq=1
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, M., & Higgott, R. (2014). The changing architecture of politics in the Asia-Pacific: Australia’s middle power moment? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 14(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lct016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behringer, R. M. (2005). Middle power leadership on the human security agenda. Cooperation and Conflict, 40(3), 305–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836705055068
   Google Scholar
• Björkdahl, A. (2013). Ideas and norms in Swedish peace policy. Swiss Political Science Review, 19(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, L. (2013). Bridging between Myanmar and international society – Japan’s self-identity and kakehashi policy. The Pacific Review, 26(4), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2013.788064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botero, G. (1635). The cause of the greatnesse of cities three bookes. With certaine observations concerning the sea. London: Henry Seile.
   Google Scholar
• Boutros-Ghali, B. (1992). An agenda for peace: Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peacekeeping. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, B., & Brooks, E. T. (2003). The nature and historical context of the Mencius. In A. K. Chan (Ed.), Mencius: Context and interpretations (pp. 242–281). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burma News International (BNI). (2014). Deciphering Myanmar’s peace process: A reference guide 2014. Chiang Mai: Burma News International.
   Google Scholar
• Burma News International (BNI). (2016). Deciphering Myanmar’s peace process: A reference guide 2016. Chiang Mai: Burma News International.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. (2014). Is Australia a middle power? A systemic impact approach. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2013.840264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapnick, A. (1999). The middle power. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 7(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.1999.9673212
   Google Scholar
• Chau, T., & Robinson, G. (2022, March 18). Myanmar military approves Norwegian Telenor’s exit. Nikkei Asia. https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Telecommunication/Myanmar-military-approves-Norwegian-Telenor-s-exit.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. F. (1997). Niche diplomacy: A conceptual overview. In A. F. Cooper (Ed.), Niche diplomacy: Middle powers after the Cold War (pp. 1–24). Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. A. (2011). Challenging contemporary notions of middle power influence: Implications of the Proliferation Security Initiative [PSI] for ‘middle power theory. Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(3), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. A. (2013). Somewhere between great and small: Disentangling the conceptual jumble of middle, regional, and ‘niche’ powers. Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 14(2), 23–35. Doi: Https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/whith14&div=18&id=&page=.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. F., Higgot, R. A., & Nossal, K. R. (1993). Relocating middle powers: Australia and Canada in a changing world order. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. (1996). Middlepowermanship, Japan, and future world order (1989). In R. W. Cox (Ed.), Approaches to world order (pp. 241–275). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darby, J., & Ginty, R. M. (2003). Introduction: What peace? What process? In J. Darby & R. M. Ginty (Eds.), Contemporary peacemaking: Conflict, violence and peace processes (pp. 1–6). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Darwich, M. (2020). Middle power theory at the regional level: An analytical framework for the Middle East. In A. Saouli (Ed.), Unfulfilled aspirations: Middle power politics in the Middle East (pp. 31–48). London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. E., & True, J. (2017). Norm entrepreneurship in foreign policy: William Hague and the prevention of sexual violence in conflict. Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(3), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). (2015). Aid investment plan Myanmar: 2015–2020. Canberra: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). (2017). Myanmar aid program performance report 2016-17. Canberra: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Donneur, A. P., & Alain, C. C. (1997). Canada: A reassertion of its role as a middle power. In P. G. Le Prestre (Ed.), Role quests in the post-Cold War era (pp. 225–250). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dossi, S., & Gabusi, G. (2022). Of constraints and opportunities. Dependent asymmetry in China-Myanmar relations, 2011–2021. The Pacific Review, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2091648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffield, M. (2014). Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Efstathopoulos, C. (2018). Middle powers and the behavioural model. Global Society, 32(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2017.1351422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egreteau, R. (2016). Caretaking democratization: The military and democracy in Myanmar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P., & Wilkins, T. S. (2023). Japan and the new Indo-Pacific order: The rise of an entrepreneurial power. The Pacific Review, 36(4), 691–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2033820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesan, N. (2013). Interpreting recent developments in Myanmar as an attempt to establish political legitimacy. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 1(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.18588/201311.000015
   Google Scholar
• Gecelovsky, P. (2009). Constructing a middle power: Ideas and Canadian foreign policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 15(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2009.9673483
   Google Scholar
• Ingebritsen, C. (2002). Norm entrepreneurs: Scandinavia’s role in world politics. Cooperation and Conflict, 37(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836702037001689
   Google Scholar
• Jordaan, E. (2003). The concept of a middle power in International Relations: Distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon, 30(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0258934032000147282
   Google Scholar
• Karen Peace Support Network. (2014). Critique of Japan International Cooperation Agency’s Blueprint for Development in South-Eastern Burma (Myanmar). Karen Peace Support Network.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, M. F. (2018). Middle power, status-seeking and role conceptions: The cases of Indonesia and South Korea. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 72(4), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2018.1443428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall, M. (2016). Understanding reform in Myanmar: People and society in the wake of military rule. Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Manicom, J., & Reeves, J. (2014). Locating middle powers in International Relations theory and power transitions. In B. Gilley & A. O’Neill (Eds.), Middle powers and the rise of China (pp. 23–44). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCandless, E. (2012). Peace dividends and beyond: Contributions of administrative and social services to peacebuilding. New York: UN Peacebuilding Support Office.
   Google Scholar
• Middle East Monitor. (2023, June 16). Russia: Algeria can play role of mediator in conflict with Ukraine. Middle East Monitor. https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20230616-russia-algeria-can-play-role-of-mediator-in-conflict-with-ukraine/.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs and National Community Abroad. (2023). Regional and International Crises. https://www.mfa.gov.dz/foreign-policy/international-and-regional-issues/regional-and-international-crises.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (2019). So you want to be a policy entrepreneur? Policy Design and Practice, 2(4), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2019.1675989
   Google Scholar
• Mohan Malik, J. (2018). Myanmar’s role in China’s maritime Silk Road initiative. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(111), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1410969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H., & Wunderlich, C. (2018). Not lost in contestation: How norm entrepreneurs frame norm development in the nuclear non-proliferation regime. Contemporary Security Policy, 39(3), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2017.1394032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nippon.com. (2023, February 7). Nippon Foundation chief eager to promote peace in Myanmar. https://www.nippon.com/en/news/yjj2023020700162/
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. (2008). Public diplomacy & soft power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østerud, Ø. (1997). Between realism and ‘crusader diplomacy’: The Norwegian channel to Jericho. In A. F. Cooper (Ed.), Niche diplomacy: Middle powers after the Cold War (pp. 90–99). Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patience, A. (2014). Imagining middle powers. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(2), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2013.840557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patience, A. (2018). Australian foreign policy in Asia: Middle power or awkward partner? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peng-Er, L. (2004). Japan’s peace‐building diplomacy in Aceh. Asian Ethnicity, 5(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463136042000259798
   Google Scholar
• Peng-Er, L. (2009). Japan’s peacebuilding diplomacy: Seeking a more active political role. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinitbhand Paribatra, M. L. (2022). Myanmar’s struggle for survival: Vying for autonomy and agency. The Pacific Review, 35(2), 269–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2021.1998205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, C. (1990). Middle power internationalism and global poverty. In C. Pratt (Ed.), Middle power internationalism (pp. 3–24). Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2016). Contemporary conflict resolution: The prevention, management and transformation of deadly conflicts (4th ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravenhill, J. (1998). Cycles of middle power activism: Constraint and choice in Australian and Canadian foreign policies. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 52(3), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357719808445259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenhill, J. (2018). Entrepreneurial states: A conceptual overview. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 73(4), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702018811813
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. (2017). Middle-power definitions: Confusion reigns supreme. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(4), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2017.1293608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røren, P. (2019). Status seeking in the friendly Nordic neighborhood. Cooperation and Conflict, 54(4), 562–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836719828410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, C. (2022). Myanmar’s peace process and the role of middle power states. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seekins, D. M. (2007). Burma and Japan since 1940 – from ‘co- prosperity’ to ‘quiet dialogue.’ Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Seekins, D. M. (2015). Japan’s development ambitions for Myanmar: The problem of ‘economics before politics’. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 34(2), 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341503400205
   Google Scholar
• Selby, J. (2008). The political economy of peace processes. In M. Pugh, N. Cooper, & M. Turner (Eds.), Whose peace? Critical perspectives on the political economy of peacebuilding (pp. 11–29). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• South, A. (2018). ‘Hybrid governance’ and the politics of legitimacy in the Myanmar peace process. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1387280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stairs, D. (1998). Of medium powers and middling roles. In K. Booth (Ed.), Statecraft and security: The Cold War and beyond (pp. 270–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, D. I. (2010). The United States and Myanmar: A ‘boutique issue’? International Affairs, 86(1), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00874.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, M. D. (2013). The concept and role of middle powers during global rebalancing. Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 14, 36–52. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/whith14&div=19&id=&page=.
   Google Scholar
• Stokke, K. (2012). Peace-building as small state foreign policy: Norway’s peace engagement in a changing international context. International Studies, 49(3–4), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881714532334
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2020). Is Australia’s Indo-Pacific strategy an illusion. International Affairs, 96(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telenor. (2015). Telenor Annual Report 2015. Oslo: Telenor Group.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, S. (2022). Middle powers amid Sino-U.S. rivalry: Assessing the ‘good regional citizenship’ of Australia and Indonesia. The Pacific Review, 35(6), 1135–1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2075444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Asia Foundation. (2017). The contested areas of Myanmar: Subnational conflict, aid, and development. San Francisco: The Asia Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• The Myanmar Peace Support Initiative (MPSI). (2014). Lessons learned from MPSI’s work supporting the peace process in Myanmar: March 2012 to March 2014. Yangon: The Myanmar Peace Support Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Thies, C. G., & Sari, A. C. (2018). A role theory approach to middle powers: Making sense of Indonesia’s place in the international system. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 40(3), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs40-3c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trading Economics. (2020). Myanmar—net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway. https://tradingeconomics.com/myanmar/net- bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-us-dollar-wb-data.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ungerer, C. (2007). The ‘middle power’ concept in Australian foreign policy. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 53(4), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.2007.00473.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wyk, J. (2015). South Africa’s post-Apartheid nuclear diplomacy: Practice and principles. Insight on Africa, 7(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975087815580727
   Google Scholar
• Wade, F. (2017). Myanmar’s enemy within: Buddhist violence and the making of a Muslim other. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, A., & Laoutides, C. (2018). Myanmar’s ‘Rohingya’ conflict. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wight, M. (1978). Power politics. London: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. (2019). Defining middle powers through IR theory: Three images. In T. Struye de Swielande, D. Vandamme, & T. Wilkins (Eds.), Re-thinking middle powers in the Asian Century: New theories, new cases (pp. 45–61). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. (2016). Eyewitness to early reform in Myanmar. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, M., & Ng, D. (2023, February 16). Japanese peacemaker brokers rare but shaky truce between Myanmar’s military and Rakhine ethnic group. Channel News Asia. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/myanmar-coup-ethnic-rakhine-japan-envoy-yohei-sasakawa-truce-3281121
   Google Scholar
• Youde, J. R., & Slagter, T. H. (2013). Creating ‘good international citizens’ middle powers and domestic political institutions. Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 14(2), 123–133. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/whith14&div=25&id=&page=
   Google Scholar