Effect of elevated progesterone levels the day before ovulation on pregnancy outcomes in natural cycles of frozen thawed embryo transfer

References

• Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, et al. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(1):2–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, et al. Similar ongoing pregnancy rates after blastocyst transfer in fresh donor cycles and autologous cycles using cryopreserved bipronuclear oocytes suggest similar viability of transferred blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(1):319–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobara T, Gelbaya TA, Ayeleke RO. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):CD003414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AE, Kollen BJ, et al. What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(2):255–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee VC, Li RH, Chai J, et al. Effect of preovulatory progesterone elevation and duration of progesterone elevation on the pregnancy rate of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in natural cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1288–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaodi Z, Qiuyuan L, Yisha Y, et al. The effect of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles which underwent hormone replacement therapy. PLoS One 2020;15(9):e0239120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long X, Wang Y, Wu F, et al. Pregnancy outcomes of single/double blastocysts and cleavage embryo transfers: a retrospective cohort study of 24,422 frozen-thawed cycles. Reprod Sci. 2020;27(12):2271–2278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eftekhar M, Mohammadi B, Tabibnejad N, et al. Frozen-thawed cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in high responder patients. Zygote 2020;28(6):511–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salumets A, Suikkari AM, Mäkinen S, et al. Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(9):2368–2374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu H, Mao X, et al. Effect of body mass index on pregnancy outcomes in a freeze-all policy: an analysis of 22,043 first autologous frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles in China. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su Y, Ji H, Jiang W, et al. Effect of unplanned spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation on pregnancy outcomes in planned artificial frozen embryo transfer cycles: a propensity score matching study. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(6):1542–1551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessey BA, Young SL. What exactly is endometrial receptivity? Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):611–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinsden PR. A textbook of in vitro fertilization and assisted reproduction. New York (NY): The Parthenon Publishing Group, Inc; 1999. p. 196.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, et al. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie WG. Sonographic evaluation of normal and induced ovulation. Radiology 1986;161(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bu Z, Wang K, Dai W, et al. Endometrial thickness significantly affects clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(7):524–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlu MF, Erdem M, Erdem A, et al. The impact of premature progesterone rise on the outcome of intrauterine insemination cycles with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in unexplained infertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;203:44–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dozortsev DI, Diamond MP. Luteinizing hormone-independent rise of progesterone as the physiological trigger of the ovulatory gonadotropins surge in the human. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):191–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vijver A, Polyzos NP, Van Landuyt L, et al. What is the optimal duration of progesterone administration before transferring a vitrified-warmed cleavage stage embryo? A randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(5):1097–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatemi HM, Bourgain C, Donoso P, et al. Effect of oral administration of dydrogestrone versus vaginal administration of natural micronized progesterone on the secretory transformation of endometrium and luteal endocrine profile in patients with premature ovarian failure: a proof of concept. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(5):1260–1263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackens S, Santos-Ribeiro S, van de Vijver A, et al. Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(11):2234–2242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prapas Y, Prapas N, Jones EE, et al. The window for embryo transfer in oocyte donation cycles depends on the duration of progesterone therapy. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(3):720–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewoud ER, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ, ANTARCTICA Study Group. The effect of elevated progesterone levels before HCG triggering in modified natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34(5):546–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Vijver A, Drakopoulos P, Polyzos NP, et al. Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer on the 5th or 7th day of progesterone supplementation in an artificial cycle: a randomised controlled trial. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33(10):783–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelens C, Santos-Ribeiro S, Becu L, et al. Frozen-warmed blastocyst transfer after 6 or 7 days of progesterone administration: impact on live birth rate in hormone replacement therapy cycles. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(1):125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar