Ovarian reserve analysis in subfertile women based on physical, ultrasound and hormonal parameters

References

• Ulrich ND, Marsh EE. Ovarian reserve testing: a review of the options, their applications, and their limitations. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;62(2):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Zeng L, Yang R, et al. Retrospective cohort study: AMH is the best ovarian reserve markers in predicting ovarian response but has unfavorable value in predicting clinical pregnancy in GnRH antagonist protocol. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(3):763–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffer JB, Carvalho RFd, Souza Aguiar APd, et al. Which ovarian reserve marker relates to embryo quality on day 3 and blastocyst; age, AFC, AMH? JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021;25(1):109–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehraninezhad ES, Mehrabi F, Taati R, et al. Analysis of ovarian reserve markers (AMH, FSH, AFC) in different age strata in IVF/ICSI patients. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016;14(8):501–506.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al Rashid K, Taylor A, Lumsden MA, et al. Association of the functional ovarian reserve with serum metabolomic profiling by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a cross-sectional study of∼ 400 women. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahami N, Izhaki I, Younis JS. Do young women with unexplained infertility show manifestations of decreased ovarian reserve? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(6):1143–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moolhuijsen LM, Visser JA. Anti-Müllerian hormone and ovarian reserve: update on assessing ovarian function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(11):3361–3373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siristatidis C, Pouliakis A, Sergentanis TN. Special characteristics, reproductive, and clinical profile of women with unexplained infertility versus other causes of infertility: a comparative study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(8):1923–1930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Li T, Wang B, et al. Mild stimulation protocol vs conventional controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in poor ovarian response patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301(5):1331–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor A. ABC of subfertility: extent of the problem. BMJ. 2003;327(7412):434–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steiner AZ, Pritchard D, Stanczyk FZ, et al. Association between biomarkers of ovarian reserve and infertility among older women of reproductive age. JAMA. 2017;318(14):1367–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges E, Jr, Zanetti BF, Setti AS, et al. FSH dose to stimulate different patient’ages: when less is more. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017;21(4):336–342.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Revelli A, Gennarelli G, Biasoni V, et al. The ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) significantly correlates with ovarian reserve biomarkers, is more predictive of clinical pregnancy than the total number of oocytes, and is consistent in consecutive IVF cycles. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehan S, Syed S. Association of ovarian reserve with age, BMI and serum FSH level in subfertile women. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66:409–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adak SR, Ghosh C, Pal S, et al. Biochemical parameters serving as prognostic indicators of ovarian reserve in females with unexplained sub-fertility. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16(05):61–65.
   Google Scholar
• Okunola T, Ajenifuja KO, Loto OM, et al. Follicle stimulating hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone among fertile and infertile women in Ile-Ife, Nigeria: is there a difference? Int J Fertil Steril. 2017;11:33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rehman R, Hussain Z, Faraz N. Effect of estradiol levels on pregnancy outcome in obese women. J Ayub Med College Abbottabad. 2012;24:3–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albu D, Albu A. The relationship between anti-Müllerian hormone serum level and body mass index in a large cohort of infertile patients. Endocrine. 2019;63(1):157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui QUA, Anjum S, Zahra F, et al. Ovarian reserve parameters and response to controlled ovarian stimulation in infertile patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(4):958–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffas HA, Al-Janabi HA, Jawad RG. Thyroid status in iraqi subfertile women: a case control study. Ind J Public Health Res Dev. 2019;10(4):710.
   Google Scholar
• Zaidi S, Usmani A, Shokh IS, et al. Ovarian reserve and BMI between fertile and subfertile women. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009;19:21–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Luo M, Ma M, et al. Ovarian aging: an ongoing prospective community-based cohort study in Middle-aged chinese women. Climacteric. 2018;21(4):404–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafar M. Association of body mass index (BMI) and sub-fertility among young women in karachi, Pakistan. Fertil Sci Res. 2019;6(1):23.
   Google Scholar
• Hong S, Chang E, Han EJ, et al. The anti-Mullerian hormone as a predictor of early pregnancy loss in subfertile women. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2020;66(6):370–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasternak MC, Christos P, Spandorfer SD. The relationship between body mass index and anti-mullerian hormone levels in reproductive-age women; is there a negative correlation? Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):e42–e43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn SH, Lee I, Cho S, et al. Predictive factors of conception and the cumulative pregnancy rate in subfertile couples undergoing timed intercourse with ultrasound. Front. Endocrinol. 2021;12:363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eekelen R, Eijkemans M, Mochtar M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of medically assisted reproduction or expectant management for unexplained subfertility: when to start treatment? Hum Reprod. 2020;35(9):2037–2046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najmabadi S, Schliep KC, Simonsen SE, et al. Menstrual bleeding, cycle length, and follicular and luteal phase lengths in women without known subfertility: a pooled analysis of three cohorts. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020;34(3):318–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moslehi N, Shab BS, Ramezani TF, et al. Systematic review of the association between BMI and antimullerian hormone (AMH) levels in reproductive aged women. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;20(2):89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Islam Y, Aboulghar MM, AlEbrashy AE-D, et al. The value of different ovarian reserve tests in the prediction of ovarian response in patients with unexplained infertility. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2016;21(2):69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Xu Y, Xue Q, et al. Discordance between antral follicle counts and anti-Müllerian hormone levels in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019;17(1):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank-Herrmann P, Jacobs C, Jenetzky E, et al. Natural conception rates in subfertile couples following fertility awareness training. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(4):1015–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha R, Shrestha K. Knowledge regarding subfertility among reproductive age women in selected VDC of baglung district. J Chitwan Med Coll. 2018;8(2):49–56.
   Google Scholar