Treatment of osteoporosis by long-term magnetic field with extremely low frequency in rats

References

• Boyce B F, Hughes D E, Wright K R, Xing L, Dai A. Recent advances in bone biology provide insight into the pathogenesis of bone diseases. Lab Invest 1999; 79: 83–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIH Consensus Development Conference. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. NIH Consens Statement 2000; 17: 1–45
   Google Scholar
• Paterson C R. Vitamin-D poisoning; Survey of causes in 21 patients with hypercalcaemia. Lancet 1980; 1: 1164–1165
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riggs B L, Nelson K I. Effect of long term treatment with calcitriol on calcium absorption and mineral metabolism in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1985; 61: 457–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahavni V, Sood A K. Hormone replacement therapy and cancer risk. Curr Opin Oncol 2001; 13: 384–389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cane V, Botti P, Soana S. Pulsed magnetic fields improve osteoblast activity during the repair of an experimental osseous defect. J Orthop Res 1993; 11: 664–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaron R K. Treatment of nonunions with electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 419: 21–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Icaro Cornaglia A. Stimulation of osteoblast growth by an electromagnetic field in a model of bone-like construct. Eur J Histochem 2006; 50: 199–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang K, Chang W H. Pulsed electromagnetic fields prevent osteoporosis in an ovariectomized female rat model: a prostaglandin E2-associated process. Bioelectromagnetics 2000; 324: 189–198
   Google Scholar
• Wu H. Effect of electromagnetic fields on proliferation and differentiation of cultured mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 2005; 25: 185–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tabrah F, Hoffmeier M, Gilbert F, Batkin S, Bassett C AL. Bone density changes in osteoporosis-prone women exposed to pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs). J Bone Miner Res 1990; 5: 437–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lirani A P. Evidences of physical agents action on bone metabolism and their potential clinical use. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2005; 49: 891–896
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Funk R H. Effects of electromagnetic fields on cells: physiological and therapeutical approaches and molecular mechanisms of interaction. A review. Cells Tissues Organs 2006; 182: 59–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okudan B. DEXA analysis on the bones of rats exposed in utero and neonatally to static and 50 Hz electric fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2006; 27: 589–592
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciombor D M. The role of electrical stimulation in bone repair. Foot Ankle Clin 2005; 10: 579–593
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLeod K J, Rubin C T. Effect of low-frequency electrical fields on osteogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1992; 74: 920–929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin C T, Donahue H J, Rubin J E, McLeod K J. Optimatization of electric field parameters for the control of bone remodeling: exploitation of an indigenous mechanism for the prevention of osteopenia. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8: S573–S581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simske S J, Wachtel H, Luttges M W. Effect of localized pulsed electromagnetic fields on tail-suspension osteopenia in growing mice. Bioelectromagnetics 1991; 12: 101–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexa O. Electrically induced osteogenesis. II. Experimental studies. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Isai 1996; 100: 62–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yonemori K, Matsunaga S, Ishidou Y, Maeda S, Yoshida H. Early effects of electrical stimulation on osteogenesis. Bone 1996; 19: 173–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry P S, Sadasivan K K, Marino A A, Albright J A. Electromagnetic fields can affect osteogenesis by increasing the rate of differentiation. Clin Orthop 1997; 338: 262–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderman I, Somjen D, Shimshoni Z, Levy J, Fischler H, Korenstein R. Stimulation of skeletal-derived cell cultures by different electric field intensities is cell-specific. Biochim Biophys Acta 1985; 844: 273–279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez RJ, Pamies JA, Hernandez ER, Revilla M, Seco C, Villa LF, Rico H. Influence of electromagnetic fields on bone mass and growth in developing rats: a morphometric, densitometric, and histomorphometric study. Calcif Tissue Int 1997; 60: 533–537
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fukada E, Yasuda L. On the piezoelectric effect of bone. J Physiol Soc Jpn 1957; 12: 1158–1162
   Google Scholar
• Lind M, Burger C. Factors stimulating bone formation. Eur Spine J 2001; 10: 102–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin J, McLeod K J, Titus L, Nanes M S, Catherwood B D, Rubin C T. Formation of osteoclast-like cells is suppressed by low frequency, low intensity electric fields. J Orthop Res 1996; 14: 7–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar VS, Simon BI, Bax CMR, Pazianas M, Moonga BS, Adebanjo OA, Zaidi M. Effect of electromagnetic stimulation on the functional responsiveness of isolated rat osteoclasts. J Cell Physiol 1998; 175: 537–544
   Google Scholar
• Lee J H, McLeod K J. Morphologic responses of osteoblast-like cells in monolayer culture to ELF electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2000; 21: 129–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin C T, McLeod K J. Inhibition of osteopenia by biophysical intervention. Osteoporosis, R Marcus, D Feldman, J Kelsey. Academic Press, San Fransisco 1996; 351–371
   Google Scholar
• Bassett L S, Tzitzikalakis G, Pawluk R J, Bassett C AL. Prevention of disuse osteoporosis in the rat by means of pulsing electromagnetic fields. Electrical properties of bone and cartilage: experimental effects and clinical applications, C T Brighton, J Black, S R Pollack. Grune and Stratton, New York 1979; 311–331
   Google Scholar
• Cruess R L, Kan K, Bassett C A. The effect of pulsing electromagnetic fields on bone metabolism in experimental disuse osteoporosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; 173: 245–250
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu S, Tomita N, Ohhata R, Ikada Y. Static magnetic field effects on bone formation of rats with an ischemic bone model. BioMed Mater Eng 2001; 11: 257–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert C, Deniz M, Düz M Z, Aşken F, Kaya A. The preventive effect on bone loss 50-Hz, 1-mT electromagnetic field in ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Metab 2002; 20: 345–349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin R B, Gutman W. The effect of electric fields on osteoporosis of disuse. Calcif Tissue Res 1978; 25: 23–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brighton C T, Tadduni G T, Pollak S R. Treatment of sciatic denervation disuse osteoporosis in the rat tibia with capacitivly coupled electrical stimulation. Dose response and duty cycle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 22–28
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda T, Yamaguchi A, Yokose S, Nagai Y, Yamato H, Nakamura T, Tsurukomi H, Tanizawa T, Yoshiki S. Changes in biological activity of bone cells in ovariectomized rats revealed by in situ hybridization. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11: 780–788
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baldock P A, Need A G, Moore R J, Durbridge T C, Morris H A. Discordance between bone turnover and bone loss: effects of aging and ovariectomy in the rat. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1442–1448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanizawa T, Yamaguchi A, Uchiyama Y, Miyaura C, Ikeda T, Ejiri S, Nagai Y, Yamato H, Murayama H, Sato M, et al. Reduction in bone formation and elevated bone resorption in ovariectomized rats with special reference to acute inflammation. Bone 2000; 26: 43–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B W, Matt K S. Effect of EMF exposure on the neuroendocrine system. The melatonin ‘hypothesis’: breast cancer and the use of electric power, R G Stevens, B W Wilson, L E Anderson. Battelle Press, Columbus 1997; 527–552
   Google Scholar
• Stevens R G. Electric power use and breast cancer, a hypothesis. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 125: 556–561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibel M J. Biochemical markers of bone turnover. I. Biochemistry and variability. Clin Biochem Rev 2005; 26: 97–122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartig M, Joos U, Wiesmann H P. Capacitively coupled electric fields accelerate proliferation of osteoblast-like primary cells and increased bone extracellular matrix formation in vitro. Eur Biophys J 2000; 29: 499–506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann C H, Schwartz Z, Liu Y, Guerkov H, Dean D D, Simon B, Boyan B D. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of MG63 osteoblast-like cells affects differentiation and local factor production. J Orthop Res 2000; 16: 637–646
   Google Scholar
• Diniz P, Shomura K, Soejima K, Ito G. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation on bone tissue like formation are dependent on the maturation stages of the osteoblasts. Bioelectromagnetics 2002; 23: 398–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan R. Biochemical markers of bone turnover. Clin Chim Acta 2001; 313: 95–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaki O, Yoshikata I, Kikuchi R, Nakayama M, Uchiyama Y, Hirahara F, Gorai I. The predictive value of biochemical markers of bone turnover for bone mineral density in postmenopausal Japanese women. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: 1537–1544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gur A, Colpan L, Cevik R, Nas K, Sarac A J. Comparison of biochemical markers of bone remodelling in the assessment of the effects of alendronate and calcitonin on bone in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Clin Biochem 2005; 38: 66–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang K, Chang WH-S, Yu Y-H, Shih C. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of bone marrow cells derived from ovariectomized rats affects osteoclast formation and local factor production. Bioelectromagnetics 2004; 25: 134–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar