The D.R.E.A.M. program: developing resilience through emotions, attitudes, & meaning (gifted edition) – a second wave positive psychology approach

References

• Amsden, J., & VanWynsberghe, R. (2005). Community mapping as a research tool with youth. Action Research, 3, 353–377.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, L. L. (2016a). R.E.A.L. therapy: rational-emotive attachment-based logotherapy for families. The Family Journal, 24, 164–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, L. L. (2016b). The Child Identity & Purpose (Ch.I.P.) Questionnaire: Pilot assessment and development. The International Forum for Logotherapy, 39, 78–88.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, L. L. (2017). The D.R.E.A.M. program: Developing resilience through emotions, attitudes & meaning. Journal of Counselling & Spirituality, 36, 93–120.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, L. L., St. John, E., Watt, E., & Desson, S. (in press-a). The Child Identity and Purpose Questionnaire – Interactive: Development and validation of the revised, video-based version.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, L. L., St. John, E., Watt, E., & Desson, S. (in press-b). The Interactive Symptoms Assessment: I.S.A. – Development and validation using aknowledge translation-integrated model.
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, D. (2009). Gifted children’s humor preferences, sense of humor, and comprehension of riddles. International Journal of Humor Research, 22, 419–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig, S. (2000). Profiles of success: Engaging young people’s hearts and mindsthrough service-learning. Berkeley, CA: Grantmaker Forum on Community & National Service.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick, P. C., & Jennings, P. A. (2012). Mindfulness for adolescents: A promising approach to supporting emotion regulation and preventing risky behaviour. New Directions for Youth Development, 136, 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, N. N., Holcomb-McCoy, C., & Miller, T. R. (2017). School counselors’ knowledge and involvement concerning gifted and talented students. Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy, 4, 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Casper, K. (2014). The ultimate plan to help gifted education and improve education for all kids in the process. Retrieved from sengifted.org
   Google Scholar
• Casper, K. (2017). Danger in a can: Why canned SEL skills programs in schools can harm gifted student more than help them. Retrieved from sengifted.org
   Google Scholar
• Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (2016). Health related quality of life. Retrieved www.cdc.gov
   Google Scholar
• Commissioner for Children and Young People. (2016). Involving children and young people: Participation guidelines. Perth, Western Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2009). Satiated with belongingness? Effects of acceptance, rejection, and task framing on self-regulatory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1367–1382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, K. S. (Ed.). (2010). Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies (3d ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, C., Letts, L., Klinger, D., & Shulha, L. (2014). Supporting knowledge translation through evaluation: Evaluator as a knowledge broker. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 29, 6–61.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (2007). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (2016). What having a “growth mindset” actually means. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from hbr.org
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, C., Furlong-Mallard, J., Kelly, J., King, W., McGrath, B., Pike, T., … van Nostrand, T. (2015). Teaching students who are gifted and talented: A handbook for teachers. Newfoundland and Labrador: Department of Education. Retrieved www.ed.gov.nl.ca
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. (2004). Rational emotive behavior therapy: It works for me, it can work for you. New York, NY: Albert Ellis Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. (1964). Insight and responsibility. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Frankl, V. (1986). Man’s search for meaning. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, D. (2011). Supporting spiritual giftedness. Retrieved from sengifted.org.
   Google Scholar
• Guénolé, F., Louis, J., Creveuil, C., Baleyte, J.-M., Montlahuc, C., Fourneret, P., & Revol, O. (2013). Behavioral profiles of clinically referred children with intellectual giftedness. BioMed Research International, 2013, 540153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guenole, F., Speranza, M., Louis, J., Fourneret, P., Revol, O., & Baleyete, J.-M. (2015). Weschler profiles in referred children with intellectual giftedness: Associations with trait-anxiety, emotional dysregulation, and heterogeneity of Piaget-like reasoning processes. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 19, 402–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, W. J., Wong, W. C., & Chan, M. K. (2017). Overexcitabilities as important psychological attributes of creativity: A Dabrowskian perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hébert, T. P., & Kent, R. (2000). Nurturing social and emotional development in gifted teenagers through young adult literature. Roeper Review, 22, 167–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above IQ 180: Their origin and development. New York, NY: World Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hunsley, J., & Mash, E. J. (2008). A guide to assessments that work. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, G. T., & Chapman, B. P. (2005). Logotherapy-enhanced REBT: An integration of discovery and reason. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 35, 145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Ivtzan, I., Lomas, T., Hefferon, K., & Worth, P. (2016). Second wave positive psychology: Embracing the dark side of life. London, UK: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1981). Standards for evaluations of educational programs, projects, and materials. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). Standards for evaluations of educational programs, projects, and materials. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Judd, J., Frankish, J., & Moulton, G. (2001). Setting standards in the evaluation of community-based health promotion programmes— A unifying approach. Oxford Journals Medicine & Health Promotion International, 16, 367–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaduman, E. (2013). Developing and implementing school for highly gifted, exceptionally gifted, and profoundly gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Young Scientist and Giftedness, 1, 53–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kitano, M. K. (1990). Testing and identification: Intellectual abilities and psychological intensities in young children: Implications for the gifted. Roeper Review, 13, 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kroesbergen, E. H., van Hooijdonk, M., Van Viersen, S., Middel-Lalleman, M. M. N., & Reijnders, J. J. W. (2016). The psychological well-being of early identified gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 16–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lean, D. S., & Colucci, V. A. (2013). School-based mental health: A framework for intervention. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Learning Disabilities Association of Ontario (2018). What are non-verbal learning disabilities? Retrieved: www.ldao.ca
   Google Scholar
• Liratni, & Pry,. (2011). Enfants à haut potentiel intellectuel: Psychopathologie, socialisation et comportements adaptatifs. Neuropsychiatrie De L’enfance Et De L’adolescence, 59, 327–335.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Nichols, M. L. (1991). Parent and school influences: An assessment of the social status and perceived personality and school traits of gifted students by non-gifted peers. Roeper Review, 13, 148–153.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, S. A., & Simpson, C. G. (2010). Social skills: Laying the foundation for success. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 38, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Majid, R. A., & Aliza, A. (2010). Consequences of risk factors in the development of gifted children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Malchiodi, C. A., & Crenshaw, D. (2014). Creative arts and play therapy with attachment problems. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markstrom, C. A., & Kalmanir, H. M. (2001). Linkages between the psychosocial stages of identity and intimacy and the ego strengths of fidelity and love. Identity. An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1, 179–196.
   Google Scholar
• Matter, K. (2017). Belonging at school makes a difference. Melbourne: Government of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Mofield, E. L., Peters, M. P., & Robins, J. H. (2015). The relationship between perfectionism and overexcitabilities in gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(4), 405–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association for Gifted Children (2018). Perfectionism. Retrieved from www.nagc.org
   Google Scholar
• Neihart, M., & Olenchak, F. R. (2002). Creatively gifted children. In M. Neihart, S. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 165–176). Waco, TX: Prufrock, Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Neihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N. M., & Moon, S. M. (2015). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (2nd ed.). Texas: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogurlu, U., & Sarıçam, H. (2018). Bullying, forgiveness and submissive behaviors in gifted students. Journal of Child and Family Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1138-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perham, H. J. (2013). Interpersonal skills of gifted students: Risk versus resilience (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest and Theses database. (UMI No.3505402).
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. S., & Ray, K. E. (2006). Bullying and the gifted: Victims, perpetrators, prevalence, an effects. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 148–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan, D. A. (2018). Social and emotional learning needs of gifted students (Doctoral dissertation). Walden University.
   Google Scholar
• Pilarinos, V., & Solomon, C. R. (2017). Parenting styles and adjustment in gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 87–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollet, E., & Schnell, T. (2016). Brilliant: But what for? Meaning and subjective well-being in the lives of intellectually gifted and academically high achieving adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 1459–1484.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2002). Underachievement in gifted students. Schuler, P. (2002). Perfectionism in gifted children and adolescents. In M. Neihart, S. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 81–92). Waco, TX: Prufrock, Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 4, 119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J., Encel, J., & Shute, R. (2003). The emotional and behavioural adjustment of intellectually gifted adolescents: A multi-dimensional, multi-informant approach. High Ability Studies, 14, 153–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. M. (2002). Individual differences in gifted students’ attributions for academic performances. In M. Neihart, S. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 61–70). Waco, TX: Prufrock, Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Roedell, 1984/Davidson Institute. (2017). Vulnerabilities of highly gifted children. Roeper Review, 6, 127–130. Retrieved from www.davidsongifted.org
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, B. (1995). Fundamentals of biostatistics (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
   Google Scholar
• Sanker-DeLeeuw, N. (2004). Case studies of gifted kindergarten children: Profiles of promise. Roeper Review, 26, 192–207.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, L. (2004). Training elements of elementary teachers in social and emotional development of gifted students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest and Theses database. (UMI No. 3189478)
   Google Scholar
• Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Hanson-Peterson, J. L., & Hymel, S. (2015). SEL and Preservice teacher education. In J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitrovich, R. P. Weissberg, & T. P. Gullota (Eds.), Handbook of social land emotional learning; Research and practice (pp. 406–412). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, P. (2002). Perfectionism in gifted children and adolescents. In M. Neihart, S. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 71–80). Waco, TX: Prufrock, Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Scripp, L. (2002). Essay: An overview of research on music and learning. 132–136 critical links. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lawrence_Scripp/publication/245362946_An_overview_of_research_on_music_and_learning/links/55e7116d08ae65b6389948b4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Search Institute. (2009). 40 Developmental assets for children grades K-3. Minneapolis, MN: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Shafaei, A. (Ed.). (2010). Frontiers of Language and Teaching. Florida: Universal Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• St. John, E. (2017). Meaning as an early determinant of childhood mental health: Potential influence of religious attendance (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from University of Ottawa database. doi:10.20381/ruor-20307
   Google Scholar
• Sweetland, J. D., Reina, J. M., & Tatti, A. F. (2006). WISC–III verbal/performance discrepancies among a sample of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(1), 7–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetroe, J. M. (2011). Integrated knowledge translation: An update. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W., Donnelly, J. P., & Arora, K. (2016). Research methods: The essential knowledge base (2nd ed.). California: Wadsworth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, J. (2018). Culture & emotion. California: Noba Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• VanderVen, K. (2008). Promoting positive development in early childhood: Building blocks for a successful start. Pittsburg, CA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vuyk, A. M., Krieshok, T. S., & Kerr, B. A. (2016). Openness to experience rather than overexcitabilities: Call it like it is. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 192–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, D., & Voight, A. (2016). Giftedness and overexcitability: Investigating the relationship using meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, P. T. P. (2011). Positive psychology 2.0: Towards a balanced interactive model of the good life. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 52(2), 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, P. T. P. (2017). Meaning-centered approach to research and therapy, second wave positive psychology, and the future of humanistic psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 45(3), 207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P. T. P., & Worth, P. (2017). The deep-and-wide hypothesis in giftedness and creativity [Special issue]. Psychology and Education, 54. Retrieved from http://www.psychologyandeducation.net/pae/category/volume-54-no-3-4-2017/
   Google Scholar
• Zakreski, M. J. (2018). When emotional intensity and cognitive rigidity collide: What can counselors and teachers do? Gifted Child Today, 41, 208–216.
   Google Scholar