152
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Factor structure and measurement invariance of employment counselors’ use of discretionary power and differences based on gender, training, and experience

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 129-149 | Received 22 Feb 2019, Accepted 28 Oct 2019, Published online: 11 Nov 2019

References

  • Ames, A. (2008). Arbeitssituation und Rollenverständnis der persönlichen Ansprechpartner/-innen nach § 14 SGB II. Düsseldorf, Germany: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.
  • Artkoski, T., & Saarnio, P. (2012). Therapist’s gender and gender roles: Impact on attitudes toward clients in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Addiction, 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/591521
  • Baethge-Kinsky, V., Barkham, P., Henke, J., Wolf, A., Land, R., Willisch, A., & Kupka, P. (2007). Neue soziale Dienstleistungen nach SGB II. IAB-Forschungsbericht, 15, 2–76.
  • Bartelheimer, P., & Henke, J. (2014). Vermitteln, unterstützen, beraten – Neue fachliche Ansätze für die Jobcenter. ARCHIV Für Wissenschaft Und Praxis Der Sozialen Arbeit, 4, 82–93.
  • Bedi, R. P., Haverkamp, B. E., Beatch, R., Cave, D. G., Domene, J. F., Harris, G. E., & Mikhail, A. M. (2011). Counselling psychology in a Canadian context: Definition and description. Canadian Psychology, 52, 128–138.
  • Beutler, L., Malik, M., Alimohamed, S., Harwood, T., Talebi, H., & Noble, S. (2004). Therapist variables. In M. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 227–306). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Bolte, A., Göbel, M., Göckler, R., Lohmann, B., Raith, A., Reiche, I., & Wettlaufer, A. (2012). Beratung zwischen Fördern und Fordern. Supervision und coaching (3rd ed.). Kassel, Germany: kassel university press.
  • Börner, S., Linder, D., Oberthür, J., & Stiegler, A. (2017). Autonomiespielräume als prekäre institutionelle Funktionsvoraussetzung des Fallmanagements. In F. Sowa & R. Staples (Eds.), Beratung und Vermittlung im Wohlfahrtsstaat (1st ed. pp. 211–236). Nomos. doi: 10.5771/9783845282732-210.
  • Brodkin, E. (2012). Reflections on street‐level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940–949.
  • Bundesagentur für Arbeit. (2014). Grundlagen einer Beratungskonzeption für die Grundsicherung für Arbeitsuchende. Germany: Nürnberg.
  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456–466.
  • Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504.
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons using non-invariant measurement items. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 6, 93–110.
  • Chow, D., Miller, S. D., Seidel, J. A., Kane, R. T., Thornton, J., & Andrews, W. P. (2015). The role of deliberate practice in the development of highly effective psychotherapists. Psychotherapy, 52, 337–345.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
  • Cook, J. D., Hepworth, S. J., & Warr, P. B. (1981). The experience of work. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., Sparks, J. A., Clauds, D. A., Reynolds, L. R., Brown, J., & Johnson, L. D. (2003). The session rating scale: Preliminary psychometric properties of a “working” alliance measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 3(1), 3–13.
  • Enns, C. Z. (2000). Gender issues in counseling. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed. pp. 601–638). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Escudero, V. (2018). Are active labour market policies effective in activating and integrating low-skilled individuals? An international comparison. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 7(1), 1–26.
  • European Commission. (2016). Active labor market policies. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/european-semester_thematic-factsheet_active-labor-market-policies_en.pdf
  • Federal Employment Agency. (2019). Berichte: Blickpunkt Arbeitsmarkt - Monatsbericht zum Arbeits- und Ausbildungsmarkt. Germany: Nürnberg.
  • Fonagy, P., & Paris, J. (2008). The effectiveness of psychological treatment in psychiatry. In P. Tyrer & K. R. Silk (Eds.), Cambridge textbook of effective treatments in psychiatry (pp. 98-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2006). Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 378–402.
  • Galligan, D. J. (1990). Discretionary powers: A legal study of official discretion. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
  • Göckler, R. (2010). Sanktionsgespräche in der Grundsicherung für Arbeitsuchende (SGB II) und ihre Anschlussfähigkeit zu Beratungsstandards. Sozialer Fortschritt, 59(10), 264–272.
  • Goldberg, S. B., Rousmaniere, T., Miller, S. D., Whipple, J., Nielsen, S. L., Hoyt, W. T., & Wampold, B. E. (2016). Do psychotherapists improve with time and experience? A longitudinal analysis of outcomes in a clinical setting. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63, 1–11.
  • Grant, J., Mullings, B., & Denham, G. (2008). Counselling psychology in Australia: Past, present and future – part one. The Australian Journal of Counselling Psychology, 19(2), 3–14. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/48267
  • Greeson, J. K. P., Guo, S., Barth, R. P., Hurley, S., & Sisson, J. (2009). Contributions of therapist characteristics and stability to intensive in-home therapy youth outcomes. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(2), 239–250.
  • Hawkins, D. M. (1980). Identification of outliers. London, Great Britain: Chapman and Hall.
  • Hawkins, K. (1992). The uses of discretion. Oxford, Great Britain: Clarendon.
  • Heidig, J., Schmidt, M., Jäkel, I., & Zips, B. (2015). Gesprächsführung im Jobcenter: Die Kunst, wirksam zu beraten und gesund zu bleiben. Bergisch Gladbach, Germany: EHP Verlag Andreas Kohlhage.
  • Hielscher, V., & Ochs, P. (2011). Arbeitslose als Kunden? Beratungsgespräche in der Arbeitsvermittlung zwischen Druck und Dialog (2nd ed.). Berlin, Germany: edition sigma.
  • Honea-Boles, P., & Griffin, J. E. (2001). The court-mandated client: Does limiting confidentiality preclude a therapeutic encounter? TCA Journal, 29(2), 149–160.
  • Howard, G. S., Nance, D. W., & Myers, P. (1986). Adaptive counseling and therapy: An integrative, eclectic model. The Counseling Psychologist, 14(3), 363–442.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
  • Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL VII: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: SPSS.
  • Joseph, S. (2017). Counselling psychology: Assumptions, challenges, and aspirations. In D. Murphy (Ed.), Counselling psychology: A textbook for study and practice (pp. 22–35). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kankainen, A., Taskinen, S., & Oja, H. (2004). On Mardia’s test of multinormality. In M. Hubert, G. Pison, A. Struyf, & S. van Aelst (Eds.), Theory and applications of recent robust methods (pp. 153–164). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
  • Kline, P. (2000). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London, Great Britain: Routledge.
  • Kolbe, C. (2012). Irritationen im Zwangskontext - Interaktionen im SGB II. WSI Mitteilungen, 65(3), 198–205.
  • Lane, D., & Corrie, S. (2006). Counselling psychology: Ist influences and future. Counselling Psychology Review, 21(1), 12–24.
  • Larke, J. (1985). Compulsory treatment: Some practical methods of treating the mandated client. Psychotherapy, 22, 262–268.
  • Larwin, K., & Milton, H. (2012). A demonstration of a systematic item-reduction approach using structural equation modeling. Practical Assessment Research, & Evaluation, 17(8), 1–19.
  • Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy, 30th ann. Ed.: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York, NY: The Russel Sage Foundation.
  • Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54(3), 217–224.
  • Maiti, S. S., & Mukherjee, B. N. (1990). A note on the distributional properties of the Jöreskog-Sörbom fit indices. Psychometrika, 55, 721–726.
  • Marinetto, M. (2011). A lipskian analysis of child protection failures from victoria climbié to “baby P”: A street-level re-evaluation of joined-up governance. Public Administration, 89(3), 1164–1181.
  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543.
  • Miller, S. D., & Hubble, M. (2011). The road to mastery. Psychotherapy Networker, 35(3), 22–31.
  • Miller, S. D., Hubble, M. A., & Chow, D. (2018). The question of expertise in psychotherapy. Journal of Expertise, 1(2), 1–9.
  • Millsap, R. E., & Olivera-Aguilar, M. (2012). Investigating measurement invariance using confirmatory factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 380–392). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Milne, D. (2007). An empirical definition of clinical supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 437–447.
  • Najavits, L. M., Crits-Christoph, P., & Dierberger, A. (2009). Clinicians’ impact on the quality of substance use disorder treatment. Substance Use & Misuse, 35(12–14), 2161–2190.
  • Nestmann, F. (2012). Zwangsberatung ist keine Beratung – Beratung braucht die Freiheit der Wahl. Verhaltenstherapie & Psychosoziale Praxis, 44(1), 23–28.
  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.
  • Orr, J. M., Sackett, P. R., & DuBois, C. L. Z. (1991). Outlier detection and treatment in I/O psychology: A survey of researcher beliefs and an empirical illustration. Personnel Psychology, 44, 473–486.
  • Osborne, J., & Overbay, A. (2004). The power of outliers (and why researchers should ALWAYS check for them). Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(6), 1–12. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=6
  • Oschmiansky, F., Grebe, T., Popp, S., Otto, K., Sommer, J., & Wielage, N. (2014). Kompetenzdienstleistungen im Vermittlungs- und Integrationsprozess: Eine qualitative Studie. IAB - Forschungsbericht, 7, 2–138.
  • Rice, D. (2013). Street-level bureaucrats and the welfare state: Toward a micro-institutionalist theory of policy implementation. Administration & Society, 45(9), 1038–1062.
  • Riordan, R. J., & Martin, M. H. (1993). Mental health counseling and the mandated client. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 15(4), 373–383.
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
  • Sánchez-Bahíllo, Á., Aragón-Alonso, A., Sánchez-Bahíllo, M., & Birtle, J. (2014). Therapist characteristics that predict the outcome of multipatient psychotherapy: Systematic review of empirical studies. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 53, 149–156.
  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248.
  • Schiersmann, C., Weber, P., & Peterson, C. M. (2013). Kompetenzprofil und Kompetenzerfassung für Beratende - am Beispiel des Feldes Bildung, Beruf und Beschäftigung. POSITIONEN - Beiträge Zur Beratung in Der Arbeitswelt, 2, 1–8.
  • Schütz, H., Steinwede, J., Schröder, H., Kaltenborn, B., Wielage, N., Christe, G., & Kupka, P. (2011). Vermittlung und Beratung in der Praxis: Eine Analyse von Dienstleistungsprozessen am Arbeitsmarkt. Nürnberg, Germany: Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung.
  • semTools Contributors. (2016). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (0.4-14) [Software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
  • Thompson, M. S., & Green, S. B. (2006). Evaluating between group differences in latent variable means. In G. R. Hancock & G. R. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 119–169). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.
  • Waldman, F. (1999). Violence or discipline? Working with multicultural court-ordered clients. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25(4), 503–515.
  • Wampold, B. E., & Brown, G. S. (2005). Estimating variability in outcomes attributable to therapists: A naturalistic study of outcomes in managed care. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 73, 914–923.
  • West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Woodward, C. A., Santa-Barbara, J., Streiner, D. L., Goodman, J. T., Levin, S., & Epstein, N. B. (1981). Client, treatment, and therapist variables related to outcome in brief, systems-oriented family therapy. Family Process, 20(2), 189–197.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.