458
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

What do psychoanalytic supervisees say about good supervision?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 421-443 | Received 10 Jul 2020, Accepted 26 Nov 2020, Published online: 03 Jan 2021

References

  • Ain, S., & Gelso, C. J. (2008). Chipping away at the blank screen: Self-disclosure, the real relationship, and therapy outcome. Poster presented at the annual convention of the North American Society for Psychotherapy Research, New Haven, CT.
  • Ancis, J. R., & Marshall, D. S. (2010). Using a multicultural framework to assess supervisees’ perceptions of culturally competent supervision. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(3), 277–284.
  • Bambling, M., King, R., Raue, P., Schweitzer, R., & Lambert, W. (2006). Clinical supervision: Its influence on client-rated working alliance and client symptom reduction in the brief treatment of major depression. Psychotherapy Research, 16(3), 317–331.
  • Barker, C., Pistrang, N., & Elliott, R. (2002). Research methods in clinical psychology: An introduction for students and practitioners. England: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Berger, S. S., & Buchholz, E. S. (1993). On becoming a supervisee: Preparation for learning in a supervisory relationship. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 30(1), 86–92.
  • Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2009). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Merrill.
  • Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (6th ed.). USA: Pearson Education.
  • Cabaniss, D., Glick, R. A., & Roose, S. P. (2001). The Columbia supervision project: Data from the dyad. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 49(1), 235–267.
  • Clevinger, K., Albert, E., & Raiche, E. (2019). Supervisor self-disclosure: Supervisees’ perceptions of positive supervision experiences. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 13(3), 222–226.
  • Divino, C., & Moore, M. S. (2010). Integrating neurobiological findings into psychodynamic psychotherapy training and practice. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 20(3), 337–355.
  • Doehrman, M. (1976). Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 40(1), 3–104.
  • Ellis, M. V., & Ladany, N. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In C. E. Watkins Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447–507). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2007). Competence in competency-based supervision practice: Construct and application. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(3), 232–240.
  • Frawley-O’Dea, M. G., & Sarnat, J. E. (2001). The supervisory relationship: A contemporary psychodynamic approach. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Gorman, H. E. (1999). Interpreting transference in the supervision of psychoanalytic psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 53(4), 452‐466.
  • Haynes, R., Corey, G., & Moulton, P. (2003). Clinical supervision in the helping professions: A practical guide. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Hill, C. E., & Knox, S. (2013). Training and supervision in psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 775–812). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Hill, C. E., & Knox, S. (2009). Processing the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy Research, 19(1), 13–29.
  • Hindes, Y. L., & Andrews, J. J. W. (2011). Influence of gender on the supervisory relationship: A review of the empirical research from 1996-2010. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 45(3), 240–261.
  • Jacobs, M. (2004). Psychodynamic counselling in action (3rd ed.). England: Sage.
  • Knox, S. (2015). Disclosure—and lack thereof—in individual supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 34(2), 151–163.
  • Knox, S., Burkard, A. W., Jackson, J. A., Schaak, A. M., & Hess, S. A. (2006). Therapists-in-training who experience a client suicide: Implications for supervision. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37(5), 547–557.
  • Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Inter Views: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Ladany, N. (2007). A process model for facilitating supervisee insight in supervision. In L. G. Castonguay & C. Hill (Eds.), Insight in psychotherapy (pp. 337–352). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Ladany, N., Friedlander, M. L., & Nelson, M. L. (2005). Critical events in psychotherapy supervision: An interpersonal approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Ladany, N., & Walker, J. A. (2003). Supervisor self-disclosure: Balancing the uncontrollable narcissist with the indomitable altruist. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 611‐621.
  • Lilliengren, P., & Werbart, A. (2005). A model of therapeutic action grounded in the patients’ view of curative and hindering factors in psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory: Research, Practice, Training, 42(3), 324–339.
  • Madani, Y., Kees, N., Carlson, L., & Littrell, J. (2010). Counseling students’ experience of the supervisory relationship. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/00b7/039e708da09d8810e04b9c9fe53948bb35fd.pdf
  • McKinney, M. (2000). Relational perspectives and the supervisory triad. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17(3), 565–584.
  • McNeill, B. W., & Worthen, V. (1996). A phenomenological investigation of “good” supervision events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 25–34.
  • Milne, D. (2009). Evidence-based clinical supervision. Principles and practice. Chichester, UK: BPS Blackwell.
  • Milton, M. (2008). Expectations of supervision: Everything to everyone? … or“ nothing to no-one”? In Division of Counselling Psychology (Ed.), Occasional papers in supervision (pp. 73–79). Leicester, England: British Psychological Society.
  • Morgan, M. M., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2007). Toward a common-factors approach to supervision. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(1), 1–17.
  • Morrissey, J., & Tribe, R. (2001). Parallel process in supervision. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 14(2), 103–110.
  • Pegeron, J.-P. (2008). A course on the supervisory process for candidates … and supervisors: An attempt to address inconsistencies in psychoanalytic education and the fundamental paradox of psychoanalytic training. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 28(3), 344–360.
  • Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, G. A. (2014). A practical guide to using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in qualitative research psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne – Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7–14.
  • Proctor, B. (1987). Supervision: A co-operative exercise in accountability. Enabling and ensuring: Supervision in practice. MM and PM Leicester: National Youth Bureau and the Council for Education and Training in Youth and Community Work.
  • Rønnestad, M. H., & Skovholt, T. M. (2003). The journey of the counselor and therapist: Research findings and perspectives on professional development. Journal of Career Development, 30(1), 5–44.
  • Sant, M., & Milton, M. (2015). Trainee practitioners’ experiences of the psychodynamic supervisory relationship and supervision: A thematic analysis. The Clinical Supervisor, 34(2), 204–231.
  • Sarnat, J. (2010). Key competencies of the psychodynamic psychotherapist and how to teach them in supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47(1), 20–27.
  • Sarnat, J. E. (2012). Supervising psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Present knowledge, pressing needs, future possibilities. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42(3), 151–160.
  • Sarnat, J. E. (2016). Supervision essentials for psychodynamic psychotherapies. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Sarnat, J. E. (2019). What’s new in parallel process? The evolution of supervision’s signature phenomenon. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79(3), 304–328.
  • Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2007). Pain as an assault on the self: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the psychological impact of chronic benign low back pain. Psychology & Health, 22(5), 517–534.
  • Smith, L. K. (2009). A brief summary of supervision models. Retrieved from https://www.marquette.edu/education/graduate/documents/brief-summary-of-supervision-models.pdf
  • Stromme, H. (2012). Confronting helplessness: A study of the acquisition of dynamic psychotherapeutic competence by psychology students. Nordic Psychology, 64(3), 203–217.
  • Szecsödy, I. (2008). Does anything go in psychoanalytic supervision? Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 28(3), 373–386.
  • Teitelbaum, S. H. (1990). Supertransference: The role of the supervisor’s blind spots. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7(2), 243–258.
  • Thoma, N. C., & Cecero, J. J. (2009). Is integrative use of techniques in psychotherapy the exception or the rule? Results of a national survey of doctoral-level practitioners. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46(4), 405–417.
  • Town, J. M., Lomax, V., Abbass, A. A., & Hardy, G. (2019). The role of emotion in psychotherapeutic change for medically unexplained symptoms. Psychotherapy Research, 29(1), 86–98.
  • Tuffour, I. (2017). A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A contemporary qualitative research approach. Journal of Healthcare Communications, 2(4), 52.
  • Ungar, V. R., & de Ahumada, L. B. (2001). Supervision: A container-contained approach. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 82(1), 71–81.
  • Watkins, C. E. (2011). Is psychoanalytic education effective?: Comment on Damsa et al. (2010). The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71(3), 290–292.}.
  • Watkins, C. E. (2013a). The contemporary practice of effective psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(2), 300–328.
  • Watkins, C. E. (2015a). Toward a research-informed, evidence-based psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 29(1), 5–19.
  • Watkins, C. E. (2015b). The evolving nature of psychoanalytic supervision: From pedagogical to andragogical perspective. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 24(4), 230–242.
  • Watkins, C. E. (2016). Psychoanalytic supervision in the new millennium: On pressing needs and impressing possibilities. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 25(1), 50–67.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr., & Scaturo, D. J. (2013). Toward an integrative, learning-based model of psychotherapy supervision: Supervisory alliance, educational interventions, and supervisee learning/relearning. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23, 75–95.
  • West, W. (2003). The culture of psychotherapy supervision. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 3(2), 123–127.
  • Wheeler, S., & Richards, K. (2007). The impact of clinical supervision on counsellors and therapists, their practice and their clients. A systematic review of the literature. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research: Linking Research with Practice, 7(1), 54–65.
  • Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed.). UK: Open University Press.
  • Wilson, H. M. N., Davies, J. S., & Weatherhead, S. (2016). Trainee therapists’ experiences of supervision during training: A meta‐synthesis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 23(4), 340–351.
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1986). Home is where we start from: Essays by a psychoanalyst. London, England: Penguin. (Original work published 1968)
  • Yardley, L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health, 15(2), 215–228.
  • Zaslavsky, J., Nunes, M. L. T., & Eizirik, C. L. (2005). Approaching countertransference in psychoanalytical supervision: A qualitative investigation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86(4), 1099–1131.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.