379
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Constructive criticism: An evaluation of Buller and Hardcastle's genetic and neuroscientific arguments against Evolutionary Psychology

References

  • Barrett, H. C. (2004). Dispelling rumors of a gene shortage. Science, 304, 1601–1602.
  • Barrett, H. C. (2006). Modularity and design reincarnation. In P.Carruthers, S.Laurence, & S.Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Culture and cognition (pp. 199–217). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113(3), 628–647.
  • Berthoz, A. (1988). The role of gaze in compensation of vestibular function: The gaze substitution hypothesis. Progress in Brain Research, 7, 411–420.
  • Bjorklund, D. F. (2003). Evolutionary psychology from a developmental systems perspective: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), 836–841.
  • Buller, D. J. (2005a). Adapting minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Buller, D. J. (2005b). Evolutionary psychology: The emperor's new paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6), 277–283.
  • Buller, D. J. (2007). Life after evolutionary psychology: Author's response. Metascience, 16, 17–24.
  • Buller, D. J., & Hardcastle, V. G. (2000). Evolutionary psychology, meet developmental neurobiology: Against promiscuous modularity. Brain and Mind, 1, 307–325.
  • Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: Free Press.
  • Callaway, E. M., & Katz, L. C. (1991). Effects of binocular deprivation on the development of clustered horizontal connections in cat striate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88, 745–749.
  • Clark, S. A., Allard, T., Jenkins, W. M., & Merzenich, M. M. (1988). Receptive fields in the body-surface map in adult cortex defined by temporally correlated inputs. Nature, 332, 444–445.
  • Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187–276.
  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H.Barkow, L.Cosmides, & J.Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 163–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994). Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization. In L. A.Hirschfeld & S. A.Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind (pp. 85–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Crair, M. C. (1999). Neuronal activity during development: Permissive or instructive?Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 66–93.
  • Cramer, K. S., & Sur, M. (1995). Activity-Dependent remodeling of connections in the mammalian visual system. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 106–111.
  • Crowley, J. C., & Katz, L. C. (2002). Development of ocular dominance columns in the absence of retinal input. Nature Neuroscience, 2(12), 1125–1130.
  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Ehrlich, P. R. (2000). Human natures: Genes, cultures, and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Gierer, A., & Muller, C. M. (1995). Development of layers, maps and modules. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 91–97.
  • Griffiths, P., & Stotz, K. (2007). Gene. In D. L.Hull & M.Ruse (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to the philosophy of biology (pp. 85–102). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hagen, E. H. (2005). Controversies surrounding evolutionary psychology. In D. M.Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 145–173). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Hagen, E. H., & Hammerstein, P. (2005). Evolutionary biology and the strategic view of ontogeny: Genetic strategies provide robustness and flexibility in the life course. Research in Human Development, 2, 87–101.
  • Hardcastle, V. G., & Stewart, C. M. (2007). Localization in the brain and other illusions. In A.Brook & K.Akins (Eds.), Cognition and the brain (pp. 27–39). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Horng, S., Kreiman, G., Ellsworth, C., Page, D., Millen, M. B., & Sur, M. (2009). Differential gene expression in the developing lateral geniculate nucleus and medial geniculate nucleus reveals novel roles for zic4 and foxp2 in visual and auditory pathway development. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(43), 13672–13683.
  • Hubel, D. H. (1988). Eye, brain and vision. New York: Scientific American Library.
  • Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 160, 106–154.
  • Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1963). Receptive fields of cells in striate cortex of very young visually inexperienced kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology, 26, 994–1002.
  • International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. (2004). Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature, 431, 931–945.
  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2000). Why babies' brains are not swiss army knives. In H.Rose & S.Rose (Eds.), Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 173–187). New York: Harmony Books.
  • Katz, L. C., & Crowley, J. C. (2002). Development of cortical circuits: Lessons from ocular dominance columns. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 34–42.
  • Kitcher, P. (1984). 1953 and all that. A tale of two sciences. The Philosophical Review, 93(3), 335–373.
  • Krebs, D. L. (2003). Fictions and facts about evolutionary approaches to human behavior: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), 842–847.
  • Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2003). Developmental dynamics: Toward a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), 819–835.
  • Machery, E., & Barrett, H. C. (2006). Debunking adapting minds. Philosophy of Science, 73, 232–246.
  • Majdan, M., & Shatz, C. J. (2006). Effects of visual experience on activity-dependent gene regulation in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 650–659.
  • Mameli, M., & Bateson, P. (2006). Innateness and the sciences. Biology and Philosophy, 21, 155–188.
  • Mameli, M., & Papineau, D. (2006). The new nativism: A commentary on Gary Marcus's The birth of the mind. Biology and Philosophy, 21, 559–573.
  • Marcus, G. F. (2001). The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cogntive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Marcus, G. F. (2004). The birth of the mind: How a tiny number of genes creates the complexities of human thought. New York: Basic Books.
  • Merzenich, M. M., Nelson, R. J., Stryker, M. P., Cynader, M. S., Schoppmann, A., & Zook, J. M. (1984). Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 224(4), 591–605.
  • O'Leary, D. D. M., & Stanfield, B. B. (1989). Selective elimination of axons extended by developing cortical neurons is dependent on regional locale: Experiments utilizing fetal cortical transplants. Journal of neuroscience, 9(7), 2230–2246.
  • Pallas, S. L. (2001). Intrinsic and extrinsic factors that shape neocortical specification. Trends in Neurosciences, 24(7), 417–423.
  • Plaisance, K. S., Reydon, T. A. C., & Elgin, M. (2012). Why the (gene) counting argument fails in the massive modularity debate: The need for understanding gene concepts and genotype-phenotype relationships. Philosophical Psychology, 25(6), 873–892.
  • Purves, D., White, L. E., & Riddle, D. R. (1996). Is neural development Darwinian?Trends in Neurosciences, 19(11), 460–464.
  • Quartz, S. R. (1999). The constructivist brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(2), 48–57.
  • Rakic, P. (1976). Prenatal genesis of connections subserving ocular dominance in the rhesus monkey. Nature, 261, 467–471.
  • Ruthazer, E. S., & Stryker, M. P. (1996). The role of activity in the development of long-range horizontal connections in area 17 of the ferret. Journal of Neuroscience, 16(22), 7253–7269.
  • Samuels, R. (1998a). Evolutionary psychology and the massive modularity hypothesis. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 49, 577–602.
  • Samuels, R. (1998b). What brains won't tell us about the mind: A critique of the neurobiological argument against representational nativism. Mind and Language, 13(4), 548–570.
  • Sarnecki, J. (2007). Developmental objections to evolutionary modularity. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 529–546.
  • Sengpiel, F., Stawinski, P., & Bonhoeffer, T. (1999). Influence of experience on orientation maps in cat visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(8), 727–732.
  • Shah, R. D., & Crair, M. C. (2008). Retinocollicular synapse maturation and plasticity are regulated by correlated retinal waves. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 292–303.
  • Sterelny, K. (2007). Social intelligence, human intelligence and niche construction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 719–730.
  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375–424.
  • Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Barrett, H. C. (2003). The second law of thermodynamics is the first law of psychology: Evolutionary developmental psychology and the theory of tandem, coordinated inheritances: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), 858–865.
  • Verhage, M., Maia, A. S., Plomp, J. J., Brussard, A. B., Heeroma, J. H., Vermeer, H., & … Sudhof, T. C. (2000). Synaptic assembly of the brain in the absence of neurotransmitter secretion. Science, 287(5454), 864–869.
  • von Melchner, L., Pallas, S. L., & Sur, M. (2000). Visual behaviour mediated by retinal projections directed to the auditory pathway. Nature, 404, 871–876.
  • Webster, M. J., Bachevalier, J., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995). Development and plasticity of visual memory circuits. In B.Julesz & I.Kovacs (Eds.), Maturational windows and adult cortical plasticity (pp. 73–86). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Wiesel, T. N., & Hubel, D. H. (1963). Single cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. Journal of Neurophysiology, 26, 1003–1017.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.