Criterial problems in creative cognition research

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013.10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arden, R., Chavez, R., Grazioplene, R., & Jung, R. (2010). Neuroimaging creativity: A psychometric view. Behavioural Brain Research, 214, 143–156.10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 16–29.10.1002/jocb.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–227.10.3758/BF03196968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, & frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11(4), 629–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, P. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226044521.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. (2004). The creative mind: Myths & mechanisms. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In H. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 1–30). New York, NY: Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.10.1037/h0040373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of the mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207077.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B., & Harold, J. B. (1968). The prediction of achievement & creativity. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. J. (2011). Verbal disputes. The Philosophical Review, 120(4), 515–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell, G. W. (1990). Extracting features from faces using compression networks. In D. S. Touretzky, G. E. Hinton, T. J. Sejnowski, & J. L. Elman (Eds.), Connectionist models: Proceedings of the 1990 summer school (pp. 328–337). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
   Google Scholar
• Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 1–113.10.1037/h0093599
   Google Scholar
• Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, & applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, R. (1952). Ethical absolutism and the ideal observer. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, 12(3), 317–345.10.2307/2103988
   Google Scholar
• Ghiselin, B. (1985). Introduction. In B. Ghiselin (Ed.), The creative process: A symposium (pp. 1–21). Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, J. (1979). Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 441–461.10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90246-9
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, J. (1995). Similarity-based categorization: The development of prototype theory. Psychologica Belgica, 35(2/3), 103–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, J. (2006). Concepts as prototypes. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning & motivation: Advances in research & theory (Vol. 46, pp. 79–113). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, R. M. (1981). Moral thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198246609.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature (L. A. Selby-Bigge & P. H. Nidditch, Eds.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. J., & Fodor, J. A. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Language, 39(2), 170–210.10.2307/411200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. J., & Postal, P. M. (1964). An integrated theory of linguistic description. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kharkhurin, A. V. (2014). Creativity 4in1: Four-criterion construct of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 338–352.10.1080/10400419.2014.929424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Kortmann, B., & Loebner, S. (2014). Understanding semantics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Machery, E. (2005). Concepts are not a natural kind. Philosophy of Science, 72(3), 444–467.10.1086/498473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machery, E. (2009). Doing without concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306880.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Machery, E. (2010). Précis of doing without concepts. Philosophical Studies, 149(3), 401–410.10.1007/s11098-010-9527-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, N. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 181–194.10.1037/h0071361
   Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232.10.1037/h0048850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, S., & Mednick, M. (1967). Examiner’s manual, remote associates test: College & adult forms 1 & 2. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. (2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, H. A. (1959). Vicissitudes of creativity. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity & its cultivation (pp. 203–221). New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, A. J. (2004). Psychological & neural perspectives on human face recognition. In S. Z. Li & A. K. Jain (Eds.), Handbook of face recognition (pp. 349–370). Amsterdam: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Piccinini, G., & Scott, S. (2006). Splitting concepts. Philosophy of Science, 73(4), 390–409.10.1086/516806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. H. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development & the acquisition of language (pp. 111–144). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. H. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. H. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition & categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. H., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. (1999). Misjudgment. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 235–240). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M., & Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity as blind variation & selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), 309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US Patent Office creativity criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97–106.10.1080/10400419.2012.676974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 311–322.10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H., & Vickers, P. (2017). Conceptual fragmentation and the rise of eliminativism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 7(1), 17–40.10.1007/s13194-016-0136-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance tests of creative thinking norms—Technical manual research edition-verbal tests, forms A and B-figural tests, forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1990). The Torrance tests of creative thinking norms—Technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. (2015). On the usefulness of “value” in the definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 111–124.10.1080/10400419.2015.1030320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiskopf, D. A. (2009). The plurality of concepts. Synthese, 169(1), 145–173.10.1007/s11229-008-9340-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar