431
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The flow of narrative in the mind unmoored: An account of narrative processing

Pages 560-583 | Received 16 Jul 2017, Accepted 06 Aug 2018, Published online: 18 Mar 2019

References

  • Aarne, A., & Thompson, S. (1928). Types of the folktale. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
  • Barrett, L. F., & Bar, M. (2009). See it with feeling: Affective predictions during object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1325–1334.
  • Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
  • Barthes, R. (2006 [1968]). The reality effect (R. Howard, Trans.). In D. J. Hale (Ed.), The novel: An anthology of criticism and theory 1900–2000 (pp. 229–234). Blackwell: Oxford.
  • Bauman, R. (1986). “I go into more detail now, to be sure”; narrative variation and the shifting contexts of traditional storytelling. In Story, performance and event. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter five.
  • Bemis, D. K., & Pylkkänen, L. (2013). Basic linguistic composition recruits the left anterior temporal lobe and left angular gyrus during both listening and reading. Cerebral Cortex, 23(8), 1859–1873.
  • Berlyne, D. (1960). Conflict, arousal and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Berlyne, D. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Blumenthal, A. (1967). Prompted recall of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 674–675.
  • Boden, M. (2004/1990). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Routledge.
  • Bohn-Gettler, C., Rapp, D., van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & White, M. (2011). Adults’ and children’s monitoring of story events in the service of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 39(6), 992–1011.
  • Bouvet, R., & Bonnefon, J. (2015). Non-reflective thinkers are predisposed to attribute supernatural causation to uncanny experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 955–961.
  • Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193–209.
  • Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 473–486.
  • Chow, H. M., Mar, R. A., Xu, Y., Liu, S., Wagage, S., & Braun, A. R. (2014). Embodied comprehension of stories: Interactions between language regions and modality-specific neural systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 279–295.
  • Churchland, P. M. (2012). Plato’s Camera: How the physical brain captures a landscape of abstract universals. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
  • Clark, A. (2013). Expecting the world: Perception, prediction and the origins of human knowledge. Journal of Philosophy, 110, 469–496.
  • Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action and the embodied mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Clayton, N. S., & Dickinson, A. (1998). Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature, 395, 272–278.
  • Clayton, N. S., & Dickinson, A. (1999). Scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) remember when as well as where and what food item they cached. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 403–416.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cutting, J., Brunick, K., DeLong, J., Iricinschi, C., & Candan, A. (2011). Quicker, faster, darker: Changes in Hollywood film over 75 years. i-Perception, 2, 569–576.
  • Delong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121.
  • Egner, T., & Summerfield, C. (2013). Grounding predictive coding models in empirical neuroscience research. Comments on Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 210–211.
  • Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179–211.
  • Ennemoser, M., & Schneider, W. (2007). Relations of television viewing and reading: Findings from a 4-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 349–368.
  • Fiske, S., Dupree, C., Gandalf, N., & Swencionis, J. (2016). Status, power, and intergroup relations: The personal is the societal. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 44–48.
  • Gerrans, P. (2014). Pathologies of hyperfamiliarity in dreams, delusions and déjà vu. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(article 97), 1–10.
  • Gerrig, R. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Gerrig, R. J., & O’Brien, E. J. (2005). The scope of memory-based processing. Discourse Processes, 39, 225–242.
  • Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Glenberg, A., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69–83.
  • Glenburg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 558–565.
  • Graesser, A., Olde, B., & Klettke, B. (2002). How does the mind construct and represent stories? In M. Green, J. Strange, & T. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 229–262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Graesser, A., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
  • Green, M., & Brock, T. (2002). the mind’s eye: Imagery and transportation into narrative worlds. In M. Green, J. Strange, & T. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–341). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Griffith, G. (2012). Merlin. In N. Cartlidge (Ed.), Heroes and anti-heroes in medieval romance (pp. 99–114). Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
  • Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. A. Atkins (Ed.), Perception (pp. 5). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Grimm, F., & Grimm, W. (1973). The juniper tree and other tales from Grimm. ( L. Segal & R. Jarrell, Trans.). London: Bodley Head.
  • Hasson, U., Landesman, O., Knappmeyer, B., Vallines, I., Rubin, N., & Heeger, D. (2008). Neurocinematics: The neuroscience of film. Projections, 2(1), 1–26.
  • Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Kherif, F., & Pulvermüller, F. (2008). Imagery or meaning? Evidence for a semantic origin of category-specific brain activity in metabolic imaging. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1856–1866.
  • Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51(6), 358–374.
  • Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control in real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498–504.
  • Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y. (2006). A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 18, 1527–1554.
  • Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006). Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313, 504–507.
  • Hobson, J. A., & Friston, K. J. (2012). Waking and dreaming consciousness: Neurobiological and functional considerations. Progress in Neurobiology, 98, 82–98.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  • Jordan, M. I. (1986). An introduction to linear algebra in parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing (Vol. 2, pp. 365–422). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133–156.
  • Kamide, Y., Scheepers, C., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2003). Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 37–55.
  • Katz, J. J., & Postal, P. M. (1964). An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Knill, D. (1997). Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth. Perception, 26(2), 171–192.
  • Kibbe, M., Kreisky, M., & Weisberg, D. (2017). Young children distinguish between different unrealistic fictional genres. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity & the Arts, 11, 1–8.
  • Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48, 805–825.
  • Kintsch, W. (1977). On comprehending stories. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 33–62). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. (1978). Cognitive psychology and discourse. Recalling and summarising stories. In W. U. Dressler (Ed.), Current trends in text linguistics (pp. 61–80). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
  • Kirchhoff, M. D. (2018). Predictive processing, perceiving and imagining: Is to perceive to imagine, or something close to it? Philosophical Studies [CHECK FULL NAME], 175, 751–767.
  • Knoblich, G., Seigerschmidt, E., Flach, R., & Prinz, W. (2002). Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: Evidence for action simulation during action perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A, 55(3), 1027–1046.
  • Knoeferle, P., Crocker, M. W., Scheepers, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition, 95, 95–127.
  • Kuperberg, G., & Jaeger, F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59.
  • Kurby, C., & Zacks, J. (2011). Age differences in the perception of hierarchical structure in events. Memory & Cognition, 39(1), 75–91.
  • Lord, A. (2000). The singer of tales. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  • Loschky, L., Larson, A., Magliano, J., & Smith, T. (2015). What would Jaws do? The Tyranny of film and the relationship between gaze and higher-level narrative film comprehension. PloS one, 10(11), E0142474.
  • Lwin, S. M. (2010). Capturing the dynamics of narrative development in an oral storytelling performance: A multimodal perspective. Language and Literature, 19, 357–377.
  • Magliano, J., Kopp, K., McNerney, M., Radvansky, G., & Zacks, J. (2012). Aging and perceived event structure as a function of modality. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19(1–2), 264–282.
  • Malinowski, B. (1926). Myth in primitive psychology. London: Keegan Paul.
  • Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151.
  • Mar, R., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192.
  • McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1998). Memory-based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the 1990s. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 25–42.
  • McNamara, D., & Magliano, J. (2009). Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 297–384). Burlington: Academic Press.
  • Meyer, B. J. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. New York: North Holland Publishing Company.
  • Miall, D., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389–407.
  • Miall, D., & Kuiken, D. (1999). What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28, 121–138.
  • Mitchell, D., & Cusack, R. (2016). Semantic and emotional content of imagined representations in human occipitotemporal cortex. Nature Scientific Reports, 6 article, 20232.
  • Mordvintsev, A., Olah, C., & Tyka, M. (2015). Inceptionism: Going deeper into neural networks. Retrieved from https:/research.googleblog.com/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html
  • Morera, Y., León, J. A., Escudero, I., & Vega, M. (2017). Do causal and concessive connectives guide emotional expectancies in comprehension? A double-task paradigm using emotional icons. Discourse Processes, 54(8), 583–598.
  • Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 165–187.
  • Muijselaar, M. M. L., & de Jong, P. (2015). The effects of updating ability and knowledge of reading strategies on reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 111–117.
  • Mulhall, S. (2007). The mortality of the soul: Bernard Williams’s character(s). In A. Crary (Ed.), Wittgenstein and the moral life: Essays in honor of cora diamond (pp. 355–380). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Mullally, S., Intraug, H., & Maguire, E. (2012). Attenuated boundary extension produces a paradoxical memory advantage in amnesic patients. Current Biology, 22, 261–268.
  • Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28–38.
  • Norenzayan, A., Atran, S., Faulkner, J., & Schaller, M. (2006). Memory and mystery: The cultural selection of minimally counterintuitive concepts. Cognitive Science, 30, 531–553.
  • Otten, M., & van Berkum, J. (2008). Discourse-based word anticipation during language processing: Prediction of priming? Discourse Processes, 45, 464–496.
  • Overy, K., & Molnar-Szakacs. (2009). Being together in time: Musical experience and the mirror neuron sysem. Music Perception, 26, 489–504.
  • Propp, V. (2010). Morphology of the folk tale. ( Laurence Scott, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A. (2001). Readers’ trait-based models of characters in narrative. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 737–750.
  • Reddy, L., Tsuchlya, N., & Serre, T. (2010). Reading the mind’s eye: Decoding category information during mental imagery. Neuroimage, 50, 818–825.
  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 211–236). New York: Academic Press.
  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Understanding and summarising brief stories. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 265–303). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing. (Vol. 2). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Sachs, J. (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics, 2, 437–442.
  • Sanford, A., & Emmott, C. (2012). Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Seth, A. K. (2014). A predictive processing theory of sensorimotor contingences: Explaining the puzzle of perceptual presence and its absence in synesethesia. Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(2), 97–118.
  • Smith, T., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Edit blindness: The relationship between attention and global change blindness in dynamic scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2, 1–17.
  • Speer, N. J., Zacks, J., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries. Psychological Science, 18, 449–455.
  • Spivey, M. (2007). The continuity of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stein, B., Huneycutt, W., & Meredith, M. (1988). Neurons and behaviour: The same rules of multisensory integration apply. Brain Research, 448, 355–358.
  • Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Sternberg, M. (1978). Expositional modes and temporal ordering in fiction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Sternberg, M. (2003). Universals of narrative and their cognitivist fortunes (I). Poetics Today, 24, 297–395.
  • Strong, C. J. (1998). The strong narrative assessment procedure. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
  • Suddendorf, T., & Busby, J. (2003). Mental time travel in animals? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 391–396.
  • Tan, E. S. (1994). Story processing as an emotion episode. In H. Van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 167–188). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Tehrani, J. J. (2003). The phylogeny of little red riding hood. PloS one, 8, 1–11.
  • Thompson, S. (1946). The folktale. New York: Holt: Rinehart and Winston.
  • Thompson, S. (1955–1958). Motif-index of folk literature (Vol. 6). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77–110.
  • Trabasso, T., & Wiley, J. (2005). Goal plans of actions and inferences during comprehension of narratives. Discourse Processes, 39, 129–164.
  • Turi, J. (1931). Turi’s book of Lappland. Ed. and translated into Danish by E.D. Hatt, translated from Danish by E.G. Nash. London and Toronto: Jonathan Cape.
  • Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERP’s and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443–467.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Semantic macro-structures and knowledge frames in discourse comprehension. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 3–32). New York: Psychology.
  • Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies in discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
  • Wacongne, C., Changeux, J.-P., & Dehaene, S. (2012). A neuronal model of predictive coding accounting for the mismatch negativity. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 3665–3678.
  • Ward, J., Thompson-Lake, D., Ely, R., & Kaminski, F. (2008). Synaesthesia, creativity and art: What is the link? British Journal of Psychology, 99, 127–141.
  • Westerlund, M., Kastner, I., Al Kaabi, M., & Pylkkänen. (2015). The LATL as locus of composition: MEG evidence from English and Arabic. Brain & Language, 141, 124–134.
  • Whitehead, W. (1999). Supporting language and literacy development in the early years. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Wicha, N. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1272–1288.
  • Zacks, J., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 29–58.
  • Zacks, J. M. (2015). Flicker: Your brain on movies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., & Reynolds, J. R. (2009). Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 307–327.
  • Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3–21.
  • Zwaan, R., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297.
  • Zwaan, R., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386–397.
  • Zwaan, R. A. (2009). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 28, 81–88.
  • Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.