Intersubjectivity in infancy: A second-person approach to ontogenetic development

References

• Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). The empathizing system: A revision of the 1994 model of the mindreading system. In B. Ellis & D. Bjorklund (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development. (pp. 468–492). New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Barresi, J., & Moore, C. (1996). Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(01), 107–122.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, M. C. (1975). Mother-infant exchanges: The epigenesis of conversational interaction. In D. Aaronson & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics and communication disorders. Annals of the New York academy of sciences (Vol. 263, pp. 101–113). New York: New York Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, M. C. (1979). The epigenesis of conversational interaction: A personal account of research development. In M. Bullowa (Ed.), Before speech: The beginning of human communication (pp. 63–77). London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, S. (2007). On being moved. From mirror neurons to empathy. (S. Bråten, Ed.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, S., & Trevarthen, C. (2007). Prologue: From infant intersubjectivity and participant movements to simulation and conversation in cultural common sense. In S. Bråten (Ed.), On being moved: From mirror neurons to empathy (pp. 21–34). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Brazelton, T. B., Koslowski, B., & Main, M. (1974). The origins of recipriocity: The early mother-infant interaction. In M. Lewis & L. Sosenblum (Eds.), The effects of the infant on its caregiver (pp. 49–76). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brink, I. (2004). Joint attention, triangulation and radical interpretation: A problem and its solution. Dialectica, 58(2), 179–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (1958). I and Thou. (R. G. Smith, Trans.) (2nd ed). Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
   Google Scholar
• Caskey, M., Stephens, B., Tucker, R., & Vohr, B. (2011). Importance of parent talk on the development of preterm infant vocalizations. Pediatrics, 128(5), 910–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, J. F., & Tronick, E. Z. (1983). Three-month-old infants’ reaction to simulated maternal depression. Child Development, 54(1), 185–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delafield-Butt, J. T., & Gangopadhyay, N. (2013). Sensorimotor intentionality: The origins of intentionality in prospective agent action. Developmental Review, 33(4), 399–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delafield-Butt, J. T., & Trevarthen, C. (2015). The ontogenesis of narrative: From moving to meaning. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilan, N. (2005). Joint attention, communication and mind. In N. Eilan, C. Hoerl, T. McCormack, & J. Roessler (Eds.), Joint attention: Communication and other minds (pp. 1–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eilan, N. (2017). Knowing and understanding other minds: On the role of communication. In Paper presented at Other Minds, Other Wills. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1911). Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XII (1911–1913): The case of Schreber, papers on technique and other works (pp. 215–226). London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A. (2003). The theory theory as an alternative to the innateness hypothesis. In L. Antony & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Chomsky and his critics (pp. 238–254). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470690024.ch10
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999). The scientist in the crib: Minds, brains, and how children learn. New York: William Morrow & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (1992). Why the child’s theory of mind really is a theory. Mind & Language, 7(1–2), 145–171.
   Google Scholar
• Gratier, M., Devouche, E., Guellai, B., Infanti, R., Yilmaz, E., & Parlato-Oliveira, E. (2015). Early development of turn-taking in vocal interaction between mothers and infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratier, M., & Trevarthen, C. (2008). Musical narratives and motives for culture in mother-infant vocal interaction. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15, 122–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haviland, J. M., & Lelwica, M. (1987). The induced affect response: 10-week-old infants’ responses to three emotion expressions. Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, R. P. (1993). Autism and the development of mind. Hove, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, R. P. (2002). The cradle of thought. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, K. (1982). The mental and social life of babies. How parents create persons. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinaki, T. (2010). Inter‐subjectivity during free infant–Father “protoconversation” and within “protoconversation” pauses. Early Child Development and Care, 180(1–2), 87–106.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinaki, T., & Kugiumutzakis, G. (2000). Basic aspects of vocal imitation in infant-parent interaction during the first 6 months. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 18(3), 173–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugiumutzakis, G. (1985). The origin, development and function of the early infant imitation. Sweden: University of Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Kugiumutzakis, G. (1993). Intersubjective vocal imitation in early mother-infant interaction. In J. Nadel & L. Camaioni (Eds.), New perspectives in early communicative development (pp. 23–47). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kugiumutzakis, G. (1996). Le développement de l’imitation précoce de modèles faciaux et vocaux. Enfance, 49(1), 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kugiumutzakis, G. (1998). Neonatal imitation in the intersubjective companion space. In S. Bråten (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 63–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahler, M. S. (1952). On child psychosis and schizophrenia. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 7(1), 286–305.
   Google Scholar
• Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant: Symbiosis and individuation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Malloch, S. N. (1999). Mothers and infants and communicative musicality. Musicae Scientiae, Special Issue, 1999–2000, 3, 29–57.
   Google Scholar
• Malloch, S. N., & Trevarthen, C. (2009). Musicality: Communicating the vitality and interests of life. In S. Malloch & C. Trevarthen (Eds.), Communicative musicality: Exploring the basis of human companionship. (pp. 1–11) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N. (1985). The roots of social and cognitive development: Models of man’s original nature. In T. M. Field & N. A. Fox (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 1–30). IL, US: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N. (1990). Foundations for developing a concept of self: The role of imitation in relating self to other and the value of social mirroring, social modeling, and self practice in infancy. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 139–164). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1998). Infant intersubjectivity: Broadening the dialogue to include imitation, identity and intention. In S. Bråten (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 47–62). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N. (2002). Elements of a developmental theory of imitation. In A. N. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution and brain bases (pp. 19–41). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511489969.002
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N. (2007). The “like me” framework for recognizing and becoming an intentional agent. Acta Psychologica, 124(1), 26–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1983). Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development, 54(3), 702–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1989). Imitation in newborn infants: Exploring the range of gestures imitated and the underlying mechanisms. Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 954–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6(3–4), 179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, L. (1980). The young sensitivities and expressive capacities of young infants in communication with their mothers. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, L., & Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulation of interactions between two-months-old and their mothers. In T. M. Field & N. A. Fox (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 177–198). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Nadel, J., Carchon, I., Kervella, C., Marcelli, D., & Reserbat-Plantey, D. (1999). Expectancies for social contingency in 2-month-olds. Developmental Science, 2(2), 164–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, E., & Molnar, P. (1994). Homo imitans or homo provocans? In search of the mechanism of inborn social competence. Nternational Journal of Psychophysiology, 18(2), 128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, E., & Molnar, P. (2004). Homo imitants or homo provocans? Human imprinting model of neonatal imitations. Infant Behavior and Development, 27(1), 54–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. (M. Cook, Trans.). New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, V. (2003). On being the object of attention: Implications for self-other consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(9), 397–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, V. (2005). Before the “third element”: Understanding attention to self. In N. Eilan, C. Hoerl, T. McCormack, & J. Roessler (Eds.), Joint attention: Communication and other mnds (pp. 85–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199245635.003.0005
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, V. (2010). Engaging minds in the first year: The developing awareness of attention and intention. In J. G. Bremner & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of infant development, 2nd. (365–393). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444327564.ch12
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, V., & Trevarthen, C. (2004). What we learn about babies from engaging with their emotions. Zero to Three, 24(3), 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication.New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1993). On the interpersonal origins of self-concept. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The perceived self. Ecological and interpersonal sources of self knowledge (pp. 174–184). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA; London England: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1974). Conversations with a two-month-old. New Scientist, 2nd May, 230–235.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C., & Hubley, P. (1978). Secondary intersubjectivity: Confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year. In A. Lock (Ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language (pp. 183–229). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In M. Bullowa (Ed.), Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication (pp. 321–347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1982). The primary motives for cooperative understanding. In G. Butterworth & P. Light (Eds.), Social cognition: Studies of the development of understanding (pp. 77–109). Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1993a). The function of emotions in early infant communication and development. In J. Nadel & L. Camaioni (Eds.), New perspectives in early communicative development (pp. 48–81). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1993b). The self born in intersubjectivity: The psychology of an infant communicating. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The perceived self. Ecological and interpersonal sources of self knowledge (pp. 121–173). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1998). The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity. In S. Bråten (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 15–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1999). Musicality and the intrinsic motive pulse: Evidence from human psychobiology and infant communication. Musicae Scientiae, Special Issue, 1999–2000. Rhythms, Musical Narrative, and the Origins of Human Communication, 3, 155–215.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (2002). Making sense of infants making sense. Intellectica34(1), 161–188.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C., & Reddy, V. (2007). Consciousness in infants. In M. Velmans & S. Schneider (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (pp. 41–57). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470751466.ch4
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (2008). The musical art of infant conversation: Narrating in the time of sympathetic experience, without rational interpretation, before words. Musicae Scientiae, 12(1_suppl), 15–46.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C., Delafield-Butt, J. T., & Schögler, B. (2011). Psychobiology of musical gesture: Innate rhythm, harmony and melody in movements of narration. In A. Gritten & E. King (Eds.), Music and gesture ii (pp. 11–43). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. doi:10.1017/S0021963001006552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. (1989). Emotions and emotional communication in infants. American Psychologist, 44(2), 112–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978). The infant’s response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17(1), 1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Meer, A. L., van der Weel, F. R., & Lee, D. N. (1995). The functional-significance of arm movements in neonates. Science, 267(5198), 693–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hofsten, C. (1982). Eye-hand coordination in the newborn. Developmental Psychology, 18(3), 450–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1977). The development of higher psychological functions. Soviet Psychology, 15(3), 60–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar