Longer, smaller, faster, stronger: On skills and intelligence

References

• Albin, R., Young, A., & Penney, J. (1989). The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. Trends in Neuroscience, 12(10), 366–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89(4), 369–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beilock, S. L., Wierenga, S. A., & Carr, T. H. (2002). Expertise, attention, and memory in sensorimotor skill execution: Impact of novel task constraints on dual-task performance and episodic memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 1211–1240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo, J., Borza, V., & Seidler, R. D. (2009). Age-related declines in visuospatial working memory correlate with deficits in explicit motor sequence learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102(5), 2744–2754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo, J., & Seidler, R. D. (2009). Visuospatial working memory capacity predicts the organization of acquired explicit motor sequences. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101(6), 3116–3125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, L. A., Edwards, J. D., Siengsukon, C. S., Vidoni, E. D., Wessel, B. D., & Linsdell, M. A. (2009). Motor sequence chunking is impaired by basal ganglia stroke. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 92(1), 35–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, L. A, Edwards, J. D, Siengsukon, C. S, Vidoni, E. D, Wessel, B. D, & Linsdell, M. A. (2009). Motor sequence chunking is impaired by basal ganglia stroke. Neurobiology Of Learning and Memory, 92(1), 35-44. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2009.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brozzo, C. (2017). Motor intentions: How intentions and motor representations come together. Mind & Language, 32(2), 231–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, W. L., & Harter, N. (1899). Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. Psychological Review, 6, 345–375.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfill, S. A., & Sinigaglia, C. (2014). Intention and motor representation in purposive action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(1), 119–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. (2003). Imitation as behaviour parsing. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London, Series B, 358, 529–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Call, J., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Copying results and copying actions in the process of social learning: Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8, 151–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. (1995). Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.
   Google Scholar
• Dretske, F. (1998). Where is the mind when the body performs? Stanford Humanities Review, 6(2). Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/SHR/6-2/html/dretske.html
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. California: University of Berkeley Operations Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K., Chase, W., & Faloon, S. (1980). Acquisition of a memory skill. Science, 208, 1181–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2000). Visuomotor neurons: Ambiguity of the discharge or ‘motor’perception? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 35(2–3), 165–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridland, E. (2012). Knowledge-How: Problems and Considerations. European Journal of Philosophy. doi:10.1111/ejop.12000
   Google Scholar
• Fridland, E. (2013). Imitation, skill learning, and conceptual thought: An embodied, developmental approach. In L. Swan (Ed.), The origins of mind: Springer book series in biosemantics (pp. 203–224). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fridland, E. (2014a). Skill learning and conceptual thought: Making our way through the wilderness. In B. Bashour & H. Muller (Eds.), Philosophical Naturalism and its Implications (pp. 77–100). New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fridland, E. (2015). Learning the way to intelligence: Reflections on Dennett and appropriateness. In F. De Brigard & C. Munoz-Suarez (Eds.), Content and consciousness revisited (pp. 143–161). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fridland, E. (2017). Automatically minded. Synthese, 194(11), 4337–4363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridland, E. (2018). Do as I say and as I do: Imitation, pedagogy, and cumulative culture. Mind & Language, 2018, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Fridland, E., & Moore, R. (2014b). Imitation reconsidered. Philosophical Psychology. doi:10.1080/09515089.2014.942896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & ABC Research Group, T. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. (2014). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, K. G., & Magill, R. A. (1995). Variability of practice and contextual interference in motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27(4), 299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hikosaka, O., Nakahara, H., Rand, M. K., Sakai, K., Lu, X., & Nakamura, K., ... & Doya, K. (1999). Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures. Trends in neurosciences, 22(10), 464–471
   Google Scholar
• Hikosaka, O., Nakamura, K., Sakai, K., & Nakahara, H. (2002). Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12(2), 217–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, V., & Whiten, A. (2005). Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8, 164–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Egan, P. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow (Vol. 1). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
   Google Scholar
• Kennerley, S. W., Sakai, K., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2004). Organization of action sequences and the role of the pre-SMA. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(2), 978–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., Magill, R. A., & Weeks, D. J. (1985). Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17(3), 283–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, N. (2015). Neither fish nor fowl: Implicit attitudes as patchy endorsements. Noûs, 49, 800–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, N. (2017). Embodied savoir-faire: Knowledge-how requires motor representations. Synthese, 194(2), 511–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lex, H., Schütz, C., Knoblauch, A., & Schack, T. (2015). Cognitive representation of a complex motor action executed by different motor systems. Minds and Machines, 25(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1979). On the use of concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 189–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1985). Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 39(2), 367–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, E. (2015). Attitude, inference, association: On the propositional structure of implicit bias. Noûs. doi:10.1111/nous.12089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzinger, T., & Gallese, V. (2003). The emergence of a shared action ontology: Building blocks for a theory. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(4), 549–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. G. (2000). On clear and confused ideas: An essay about substance concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montero, B. (2016). Thought in action: Expertise and the conscious mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moxley, S. E. (1979). Schema: The variability of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11(1), 65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos, M., & Pacherie, E. (2017). Intentions and motor representations: The interface challenge. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 8(2), 317–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanay, B. (2013). Between perception and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Over, H., & Carpenter, M. (2012). Putting the social into social learning: Explaining both selectivity and fidelity in children’s copying behavior. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126(2), 182–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacherie, E. (2011). Nonconceptual representations for action and the limits of intentional control. Social Psychology, 42, 67–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pammi, V. C, Miyapuram, K. P, Samejima, K, Bapi, R. S, & Doya, K. (2012). Changing the structure of complex visuomotor sequences selectively activates the fronto-parietal network. Neuroimage, 59(2), 1180-1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pammi, V. C., Miyapuram, K. P., Samejima, K., Bapi, R. S., & Doya, K. (2012). Changing the structure of complex visuo-motor sequences selectively activates the fronto-parietal network. Neuroimage, 59(2), 1180–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavese, C. (2015). Practical senses. Philosopher‘S Imprint, 15(29), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavese, C. (2017). Know-how and gradability. Philosophical Review, 126(3), 345–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975a). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 153–175). NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975b). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbit & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 669–682). Waltham: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D. M. (1986). Two concepts of consciousness. Philosophical Studies, 49, 329–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, Aristotle IN. (1936). Aristotle‘s physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Aristotle IN. (1981). Aristotle‘s metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Aristotle IN, W.D & Brown, L. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Rossetti, Y. (2001). Implicit perception in action: Short-lived motor representation of space.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakai, K., Kitaguchi, K., & Hikosaka, O. (2003). Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 152(2), 229–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82(4), 225–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3(4), 207–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, J. (2014). The contours of control. Philosophical Studies, 170(3), 395–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinigaglia, C., & Butterfill, S. A. (2015). On a puzzle about relations between thought, experience and the motoric. Synthese, 192(6), 1923–1936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J., & Williamson, T. (2016). Skill. Nous. doi:10.1111/nous.12144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterelny, K. (2012). Language, gesture, skill: The co-evolutionary foundations of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2141–2151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. A. (2005). Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action. Cognition, 95(3), 329–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stichter, M. (2007). Ethical expertise: The skill model of virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10(2), 183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, J., McIlwain, D., Christensen, W., & Geeves, A. (2011). Applying Intelligence to the Reflexes: Embodied skills and habits between Dreyfus and Descartes. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 42(1), 78–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1996). Do apes ape? In C. M. Heyes & B. G. Galef (Eds.), Social learning in animals: The roots of culture (pp. 319–346). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1999). Emulation learning and cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(5), 703–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, P., Bedard, M., Levesque, M., Chebli, M., Parent, M., Courtemanche, R., & Blanchet, P. J. (2009). Motor sequence learning in primate: Role of the D2 receptor in movement chunking during consolidation. Behavior and Brain Research, 198, 231–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B. (1994). Evidence for the development of concurrent processing in a sequential keypressing task. Acta Psychologica, 85(3), 245–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B. (1996). Buffer loading and chunking in sequential keypressing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 22, 544–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B. (2001). Concatenating familiar movement sequences: The versatile cognitive processor. Acta Psychologica, 106, 69–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B. (2010). Diminished motor skill development in elderly: Indications for limited motor chunk use. Acta Psychologica, 134, 206–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B., Abrahamse, E. L., & Jimenez, L. (2009). Segmentation of short key sequences does not spontaneously transfer to other sequences. Human Movement Science, 28, 348–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B., Abrahamse, E. L., Ruitenberg, M. F., Jiménez, L., & de Kleine, E. (2011). Motor skill learning in the middle-aged: Limited development of motor chunks and explicit sequence knowledge. Psychological Research, 75(5), 406–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B., & Eikelboom, T. (2003). Evidence for lasting sequence segmentation in the discrete sequence- production task. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 35, 171–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wymbs, N. F, Bassett, D. S, Mucha, P. J, Porter, M. A, & Grafton, S. T. (2012). Differential recruitment of the sensorimotor putamen and frontoparietal cortex during motor chunking in humans. Neuron, 74(5), 936-946. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar