References
- Ball, B. (2017). On representational content and format in core numerical cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 30(1–2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1263988
- Beck, J. (2015). Analogue magnitude representations: A philosophical introduction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(4), 829–855. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axu014
- Buijsman, S., & Tirado, C. (2019). Spatial-numerical associations: Shared symbolic and non-symbolic numerical representations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(10), 2423–2436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819844503
- Burge, T. (2010). Origins of objectivity. Oxford University Press.
- Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press.
- Carey, S., & Barner, D. (2019). Ontogenetic origins of human integer representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(10), 823–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.004
- Carey, S., Shusterman, A., Haward, P., & Distefano, R. (2017). Do analog number representations underlie the meanings of young children’s verbal numerals? Cognition, 168, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.022
- Chen, Q., & Li, J. (2014). Association between individual differences in non- symbolic number acuity and math performance: A meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 148, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.016
- Cordes, S., & Brannon, E. (2008). Quantitative competencies in infancy quantitative competencies in infancy. Developmental Science, 11(6), 803–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00770.x
- Cordes, S., & Brannon, E. (2011). Attending to one of many: When infants are surprisingly poor at discriminating an items size. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 65. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00065
- Dasgupta, S. (2013). Absolutism v.s. comparativism about quantity. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 8, 105–148.
- Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits of number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 487506. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000239
- Eddon, M. (2013). Fundamental properties of fundamental properties. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 8, 78–104.
- Fabbri, M., Cancellieri, J., & Natale, V. (2012). The A Theory Of Magnitude (ATOM) model in temporal perception and reproduction tasks. Acta Psychologica, 139(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.006
- Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
- Gallistel, C. (1990). The Organization of Learning. MIT Press.
- Gallistel, C., & Gelman, R. (2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(2), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01424-2
- Gallistel, C., Gelman, R., & Cordes, S. (2006). The cultural and evolutionary history of the real numbers. In S. Levinson & J. Pierre (eds.), Evolution and culture: A fyssen foundation symposium (pp. 247–274).
- Gebuis, T., Kadosh, R. C., & Gevers, W. (2016). Sensory-integration system rather than approximate number system underlies numerosity processing: A critical review. Acta psychologica, 171, 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.09.003
- Guillaume, M., Nys, J., Mussolin, C., & Content, A. (2013). Differences in the acuity of the approximate number system in adults: The effect of mathematical ability. Acta psychologica, 144(3), 506–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.001
- Halberda, J. (2016). Epistemic limitations and precise estimates in analog magnitude representation. In D. Barner & S. Baron (Eds.), Core knowledge and conceptual change (pp. 171–190), Oxford University Press.
- Hyde, D., Khanum, S., & Spelke, E. (2014). Brief non-symbolic, approximate number practice enhances subsequent exact symbolic arithmetic in children. Cognition, 131(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.007
- Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E., & Streri, A. (2009). Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. PNAS, 106(25), 10382–10385. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812142106
- Krantz, D., Luce, D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement, volume I: Additive and polynomial representations. New York Academic Press.
- Lipton, J., & Spelke, E. (2003). Origins of number sense: Large-number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 14(5), 396–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01453
- Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (2005). Number and natural language. In P. Carruthers (Ed.), The innate mind, vol. 1: Structure and contents (pp. 216–235), Oxford University Press.
- Nieder, A., Freedman, D., & Miller, E. (2002). Representation of the quantity of visual items in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science, 297(5587), 17081711. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072493
- Odic, D. (2017). Children’s intuitive sense of number develops independently of their perception of area, density, length, and time. Developmental Science, 21(2), e12533. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12533
- Peacocke, C. (2015). Magnitudes: Metaphysics, explanation, and perception. In A. Coliva, V. Munz, & D. Moyal-Sharrock (eds.), Mind, language and action: Proceedings of the 36th international wittgenstein symposium (pp. 357–388), Kirchberg am Wechsel.
- Piazza, M., De Feo, V., Panzeri, S., & Dehaene, S. (2018). Learning to focus on number. Cognition, 181, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.011
- Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Priftis, K., & Regolin, L. (2015). Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line. Science, 347(6221), 534–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1379
- Schneider, M., Beeres, K., Coban, L., Merz, S., Schmidt, S., Stricker, J., & De Smedt, B. (2017). Associations of nonsymbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A metaanalysis. Developmental Science, 20(3), e12372. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12372
- Szücs, D., & Myers, T. (2017). A critical analysis of design, facts, bias and inference in the approximate number system training literature: A systematic review. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 6, 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2016.11.002
- Wilkey, E., & Price, G. (2019). Attention to number: The convergence of numerical magnitude processing, attention, and mathematics in the inferior frontal gyrus. Human Brain Mapping, 40(3), 928–943. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24422
- Xu, F., Spelke, E., & Goddard, S. (2005). Number sense in human infants. Developmental Science, 8(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00395.x
- Zimmerman, E. (2018). Small numbers are sensed directly, high numbers con- structed from size and density. Cognition, 173, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.003