Toward a Mechanistic Account of Extended Cognition

References

• Adams, F. (2010). Why we still need a mark of the cognitive. Cognitive Systems Research, 11(4), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080120033571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, F., & Garrison, R. (2013). The mark of the cognitive. Minds and Machines, 23(3), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-012-9291-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, C. (2017). On (not) defining cognition. Synthese, 194(11), 4233–4249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1454-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, M., & Gebharter, A. (2016). Constitutive relevance, mutual manipulability, and fat-handedness. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67(3), 731–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axv003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, M., & Wilutzky, W. (2017). Is it possible to experimentally determine the extension of cognition? Philosophical Psychology, 30(8), 1104–1125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2017.1355453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (1993/2010). Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boem, F., Ferretti, G., & Caiani, S. Z. (2021). Out of our skull, in our skin: The Microbiota-Gut-Brain axis and the Extended Cognition Thesis. Biology & Philosophy, 36(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-021-09790-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollhagen, A. (2021). The inchworm episode: Reconstituting the phenomenon of kinesin motility. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(Article 50), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00358-5
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2010). Memento’s Revenge: The Extended Mind, Extended. In R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (pp. 43–66). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2011). Finding the mind. Philosophical Studies, 152(3), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9598-9
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craver, C. (2007a). Constitutive explanatory relevance. Journal of Philosophical Research, 32, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr20073241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craver, C. (2007b). Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craver, C. (2015). Levels. In T. K. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Eds.), Open MIND: Philosophy and the Mind Sciences in the 21st Century (pp. 1–26). MIND Group.
   Google Scholar
• Craver, C., & Darden, L. (2013). In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries Across the Life Sciences. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Facchin, M., Viola, M., & Zanin, E. (2021). Retiring the “Cinderella view”: The spinal cord as an intrabodily cognitive extension. Biology & Philosophy, 36(Article 45), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-021-09822-1
   Google Scholar
• Fazekas, P. (2013). The Extended Mind Thesis and Mechanistic Explanations. In D. Moyal-Sharrock, V. A. Munz, & A. Coliva (Eds.), Mind, Language, and Action (pp. 125–127). Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.
   Google Scholar
• Glennan, S. (1996). Mechanisms and the nature of causation. Erkenntnis, 44(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172853
   Google Scholar
• Glennan, S., & Illari, P. M. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, S. (2010). The Varieties of Externalism. In R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (pp. 101–153). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Illari, P. M., & Williamson, J. (2012). What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-011-0038-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japyassú, H. F., & Laland, K. N. (2017). Extended spider cognition. Animal Cognition, 20(3), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1069-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M. I. (2018). The components and boundaries of mechanisms. In S. Glennan & P. M. Illari (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy (pp. 116–130). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. M. (2012). How to demarcate the boundaries of cognition. Biology & Philosophy, 27(4), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-012-9308-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyre, H. (2018). Socially Extended Cognition and Shared Intentionality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(Article 831), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00831
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malleson, K. (2018). Equality Law and the Protected Characteristics. The Modern Law Review, 81(4), 598–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miłkowski, M., Clowes, R., Rucińska, Z., Przegalińska, A., Zawidzki, T., Krueger, J., Gies, A., McGann, M., Afeltowicz, Ł., Wachowski, W., Stjernberg, F., Loughlin, V., & Hohol, M. (2018). From wide cognition to mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(Article 2393), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02393
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palermos, S. O. (2014). Loops, Constitution, and Cognitive Extension. Cognitive Systems Research, 27, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parise, A. G., Gagliano, M., & Souza, G. M. (2020). Extended cognition in plants: Is it possible? Plant Signaling & Behavior, 15(2), 1710661. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2019.1710661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöyhönen, S. (2014). Explanatory power of extended cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 27(5), 735–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.766789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prychitko, E. (2021). The causal situationist account of constitutive relevance. Synthese, 198(2), 1829–1843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02170-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. (2012). You do the maths: Rules, extension, and cognitive responsibility. Philosophical Explorations, 15(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2012.670724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupert, R. D. (2004). Challenges to the Hypothesis of Extended Cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 101(8), 389–428. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2004101826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, P. R. (2018). Human-Extended Machine Cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 49, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, P. R., Clowes, R. W., & Heersmink, R. (2017). Minds Online: The Interface between Web Science, Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Mind. Foundations and Trends in Web Science, 6(1–2), 1–232. https://doi.org/10.1561/1800000026
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and Interdisciplinarity: History, the Extended Mind, and the Civilizing Process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (pp. 189–225). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Eck, D., & de Jong, H. L. (2016). Mechanistic explanation, cognitive systems demarcation, and extended cognition. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 59, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, M. (2011). In search of clarity about parity. Philosophical Studies, 152(3), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9601-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. A. (2004). Boundaries of the Mind: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences: Cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. A. (2014). Ten questions concerning extended cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 27(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.828568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. A., & Clark, A. (2009). Situated Cognition: Letting Nature Take its Course. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (pp. 55–77). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ylikoski, P. (2018). Social mechanisms. In S. Glennan & P. M. Illari (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy (pp. 401–412). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zednik, C. (2011). The nature of dynamical explanation. Philosophy of Science, 78(2), 238–263. https://doi.org/10.1086/659221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar