Understanding implicit bias: A case for regulative dispositionalism

References

• Baker, L. R. (1993). What beliefs are not. In S. J. Wagner & R. Warner (Eds.), Naturalism: A critical appraisal (pp. 321–337). University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beeghly, E., & Madva, A. (2020). An introduction to implicit bias: Knowledge, justice, and the social mind. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brownstein, M. (2019). Implicit bias. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Fall 2019. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/implicit-bias
   Google Scholar
• Brownstein, M., & Saul, J. (Eds.). (2016). Implicit bias and philosophy, volume 1: Metaphysics and epistemology. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, N. (2021). What we can and can’t infer about implicit bias from debiasing experiments. Synthese. 198. 1427–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02128-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. M. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy. 78 (2) , 67–90. doi:2025900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M., & Stone, T. (Eds). (1995). Folk psychology: The theory of mind debate. Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruin, L. C. (2017). First-person folk psychology: Mindreading and mindshaping. Studia Philosophica Estonica, 9(1), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.12697/spe.2016.9.1.07
   Google Scholar
• Elqayam, S., & Evans, J. S. B. (2011). Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(5), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1100001X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez Castro, V. (2020). Regulation, normativity and folk psychology. Topoi, 39(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9511-7
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B. (2019). Six lessons for a cogent science of implicit bias and its criticism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(4), 574–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619826015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendler, T. S. (2008a). Alief and belief. The Journal of Philosophy, 105(10), 634–663. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20081051025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendler, T. S. (2008b). Alief in action (and reaction). Mind & Language, 23(5), 552–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00352.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendler, T. S. (2011). On the epistemic costs of implicit bias. Philosophical Studies, 156(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9801-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. M. (1986). Folk psychology as simulation. Mind & Language, 1(2), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1986.tb00324.x
   Google Scholar
• Greely, N. (2014). Troubles for a new dispositional account of belief. Philosophy in Practice, 8, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2007). Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.38.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. (2019). Cognition as a social skill. Australasian Philosophical Review, 3(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2019.1705229
   Google Scholar
• Holroyd, J. (2016). What do we want from a model of implicit cognition? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 116(2), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aow005
   Google Scholar
• Holroyd, J., Scaife, R., & Stafford, T. (2017). Responsibility for implicit bias. Philosophy Compass, 12(3), e12410. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holroyd, J., & Sweetman, J. (2016). The heterogeneity of implicit bias. In M. Brownstein & J. Saul (Eds.), Implicit bias and philosophy, volume 1: Metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 80–103). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M. (2020). The structure of bias. Mind, 129(516), 1193–1236. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzaa011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T. (2019). The IAT is dead, long live the IAT: Context-sensitive measures of implicit attitudes are indispensable to social and political psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418797309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle, J. S. (2021). The impact of culture on mindreading. Synthese, 198(7), 6351–6374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02466-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, N. (2015). Neither fish nor fowl: Implicit attitudes as patchy endorsements. Nous, 49(4), 800–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machery, E. (2016). De-Freuding implicit attitudes. In M. Brownstein & J. Saul (Eds.), Implicit bias and philosophy, volume 1: Metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 104–129). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machery, E. (2021). Anomalies in implicit attitudes research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 13(1), e1569. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madva, A. (2016). Why implicit attitudes are (probably) not beliefs. Synthese, 193(8), 2659–2684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0874-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madva, A., & Brownstein, M. (2018). Stereotypes, prejudice, and the taxonomy of the implicit social mind 1. Noûs, 52(3), 611–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, E. (2016). Attitude, inference, association: On the propositional structure of implicit bias. Noûs, 50(3), 629–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeer, V. (2007). The regulative dimension of folk psychology. In D. Hutto & M. Ratcliffe (Eds.), Folk psychology re-assessed (pp. 137–156). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McGeer, V. (2015). Mind-making practices: The social infrastructure of self-knowing agency and responsibility. Philosophical Explorations, 18(2), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2015.1032331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeer, V. (2021). Enculturating folk psychologists. Synthese. 199. 1039–1063 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02760-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, R. (2001). Authority and estrangement: An essay on self-knowledge. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porot, N., & Mandelbaum, E. (2021). The science of belief: A progress report. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 12(2), e1539. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quilty-Dunn, J., & Mandelbaum, E. (2018a). Against dispositionalism: Belief in cognitive science. Philosophical Studies, 175(9), 2353–2372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0962-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quilty-Dunn, J., & Mandelbaum, E. (2018b). Inferential transitions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 532–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1358754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E. (2001). In-between believing. The Philosophical Quarterly, 51(202), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E. (2002). A phenomenal, dispositional account of belief. Noûs, 36(2), 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0068.00370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E. (2010). Acting contrary to our professed beliefs or the gulf between occurrent judgment and dispositional belief. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 91(4), 531–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E. (2013). A dispositional approach to attitudes: Thinking outside of the belief box. In N. Nottelmann (Ed.), New essays on belief: Constitution, content and structure (pp. 75–99). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The pragmatic metaphysics of belief. In E. Borgoni, D. Kindermann, & A. Onofri (Eds.), The fragmented mind (pp. 350–375). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stich, S., & Ravenscroft, I. (1994). What is folk psychology? Cognition, 50(1–3), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90040-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumulty, M. (2011). Delusions and dispositionalism about belief. Mind & Language, 26(5), 596–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumulty, M. (2014). Managing mismatch between belief and behavior. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 95(3), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vierkant, T., & Paraskevaides, A. (2012) Mindshaping and the intentional control of the mind. F. Paglieri. Consciousness in Interaction: The Role of the Natural and Social Context in Shaping Consciousness, 86. Advances in Consciousness Research. John Benjamins Pub Co. 107–123.
   Google Scholar
• Welpinghus, A. (2020). The imagination model of implicit bias. Philosophical Studies, 177(6), 1611–1633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01277-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawidzki, T. W. (2008). The function of folk psychology: Mind reading or mind shaping? Philosophical Explorations, 11(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790802239235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawidzki, T. W. (2013). Mindshaping: A new framework for understanding human social cognition. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar