References
- Aberegg, S. K., Haponik, E. F., & Terry, P. B. (2005). Omission bias and decision making in pulmonary and critical care medicine. Chest, 128(3), 1497–1505. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.3.1497
- Ansher, C., Arierly, D., Nagler, A., Rudd, M., Schwartz, J., & Shah, A. (2014). Better medicine by default. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 34(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X13507339
- Bortolotti, L., & Sullivan-Bissett, E. (2021). Is choice blindness a case of self-ignorance? Synthese, 198(6), 5437–5454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02414-3
- Brotherton, R. (2015). Suspicious minds: Why we believe conspiracy theories. Bloomsbury.
- Brotherton, R., & French, C. C. (2015). Intention seekers: Conspiracist ideation and biased attributions of intentionality. PLoS ONE, 10(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124125
- Cassam, Q. (2018). Vices of the mind: From the intellectual to the political. Oxford University Press.
- Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J. (2016). Someone is pulling the strings: Hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586
- Ebel-Lam, A., Fabrigar, R., MacDonald, T., & Jones, S. (2010). Balancing causes and consequences: The magnitude-matching principle in explanations for complex social events. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 348–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2010.519245
- Leman, P., & Cinnirella, M. (2007). A major event has a major cause: Evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories. Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 18–28.
- Lopes, D. (2018). Feckless Reason. In G. Currie, M. Kieran, & A. Meskin (Eds.), Aesthetics and the sciences of mind (pp. 21–36). Oxford University Press.
- Mercier, H. (2020). Not born yesterday: The science of who we trust and what we believe. Princeton University Press.
- van der Wal, R. C., Sutton, R. M., Lange, J., & Braga, J. P. N. (2018). Suspicious binds: Conspiracy thinking and tenuous perceptions of causal connections between co-occurring and spuriously correlated events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 970–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2507
- Van Leeuwen, N. (2014). Religious credence is not factual belief. Cognition, 133(3), 698–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.015
- Van Leeuwen, N. (2018). The factual belief fallacy. Contemporary Pragmatism, 15(3), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-01503004
- Van Leeuwen, N. (forthcoming). Imagination, Belief, and Religious Credence. Harvard University Press.