Virtually imagining our biases

References

• Amodio, D. M., & Devine, P. G. (2006). Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banakou, D., Hanumanthiu, P. D., & Slater, M. (2016). Virtual Embodiment of white people in a black virtual body leads to a sustained reduction in their implicit racial bias. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessenoff, G. R., & Sherman, J. W. (2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18(4), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2000.18.4.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, I. V., Ma, J. E., & Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 828–841. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinol, P., Petty, R., & McCaslin, M. (2009). Changing Attitudes on Implicit versus explicit measures: what is the difference? In R. Petty, R. Fazio, & P. Brinol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 285–326). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brownstein, M., Madva, A., & Gawronski, B. (2019). What do implicit measures measure? WIREs Cognitive Science, 10(5), e1501. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. (2017). The virtual and the real. Disputatio, 9(46), 309–352. https://doi.org/10.1515/disp-2017-0009
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioural confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(5), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1329
   Google Scholar
• Church, J. (2008). The hidden image: A defense of unconscious imagining and its importance. American Imago, 65(3), 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.0.0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, J. (2016). Perceiving people as people: An overlooked role for the imagination. In A. Kind & P. Kung (Eds.), Knowledge through imagination (pp. 160–182). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cogburn, J., & Silcox, M. (2014). Against brain-in-a-vatism: On the value of virtual reality. Philosophy & Technology, 27(4), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-013-0137-4
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, N. (2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000027407.70241.15
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, N. (2013). Implicit attitudes and beliefs adapt to situations: a decade of research on the malleability of implicit prejudice, stereotypes, and the self-concept. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 233–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Pinal, G., & Spaulding, S. (2018). Concept centrality and implicit bias. Mind & Langiage, 33(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diodato, R. (2012). Aesthetics of the virtual. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diodato, R. (2014). About virtual experience. some questions. Metodo International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy, 2(2), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.19079/metodo.2.2.47
   Google Scholar
• Dokic, J., & Martin, J.R. (2017). Felt reality and the opacity of perception. Topoi, 36(2), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9327-2
   Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 510–540. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, A. (2008). Seeing and believing: Perception, belief formation, and the divided mind. Philosophical Studies, 140(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9225-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 603–637. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, C., Martin, A., Bemer, D., & Hurst, S. 2019: ‘Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: A systematic review’. BMC Psychology. Vol. 7, article no. 29.
   Google Scholar
• Gadsby, S. (2019). Manipulating body representations with virtual reality: Clinical implications for anorexia nervosa. Philosophical Psychology, 32(6), 898–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2019.1632425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 59–127). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-0.00002-0
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., Walther, E., & Blank, H. (2005). Cognitive consistency and the formation of interpersonal attitudes: cognitive balance affects the encoding of social information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(6), 618–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., Taforodi, R. W., & Malone, P. S. (1993). You can’t not believe everything you read. Attitudes and Social Cognition, 65(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.221
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. I. (2006). Stimulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groom, V., Bailenson, J. N., & Nass, C. (2009). The influence of racial embodiment on racial bias and immersive virtual environments. Social Influence, 4(3), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510802643750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. (2015). Distinguished lecture: Social structure, narrative, and explanation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 45(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2015.1019176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holroyd, J. 2016: ‘What do we want from a model of implicit cognition?’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. (Vol. CXVI, no. 2, pp. 153–179).
   Google Scholar
• Holroyd, J., & Sweetman, J. (2016). The heterogeneity of implicit bias. In M. Brownstein & J. Saul (Eds.), Implicit bias and philosophy: Metaphysics and epistemology (Vol. 1, pp. 80–103). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huebner, B. (2016). Implicit bias, reinforcement learning, and scaffolded moral cognition. In M. Brownstein & J. Saul (Eds.), Implicit bias and philosophy: metaphysics and epistemology (Vol. 1, pp. 47–79). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, A. (2016). Introduction: Exploring imagination. In A. Kind (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of imagination (pp. 1–11). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinara, E., & Slater, M. (2014). Measuring the effects through time of the influence of visuomotor and visuotactule synchronous stimulation on a virtual body owndership illusion. Perception, 43(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langland-Hassan, P. (2012). Pretense, imagination, and belief: the single attitude theory. Philosophical Studies, 159(2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9696-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, N. (2015). Neither Fish nor Fowl: Implicit Attitudes as Patchy Endorsements. Noûs, 49(4), 800–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1982). Logic for equivocators. Nous, 16(3), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.2307/2216219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, S., Yang, Y., Beltran, K., Kim, S. J., Cruz Hernandez, J., Simran, C., Yang, B., & Yuksel, B. F. 2019. ‘Investigating implicit gender bias and embodiment of white males in virtual reality with full body visuomotor synchrony’. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, Paper 557, (pp. 1–12).
   Google Scholar
• Maister, L., Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Tsakiris, M. (2013). Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias. Cognition, 128(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maister, L., Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Tsakiris, M. (2015). Changing bodies changes minds: Owning another body affects social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 19(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, E. (2013). Against Alief. Philosophical Studies, 165(1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9930-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, E. (2014). Thinking is believing. Inquiry, 57(1), 55–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2014.858417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, E. (2016). Attitude, inference, association: on the propositional structure of implicit bias. Noûs, 50(3), 629–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthen, M. (2010). Two visual systems and the feeling of presence. In N. Gangopadhyay, M. Madary, & F. Spicer (Eds.), Perception, action, and consciousness: Sensorimotor dynamics and two visual systems (pp. 107–124). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, A. R., & Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behaviour, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(5), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, N., & Wildman, N. (2019). Virtual reality: Digital or fictional? Disputatio, 11(55), 371–397. https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2019-0004
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, N., & Wildman, N. (2020). The puzzle of virtual theft. Analysis, 80(3), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anaa005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijsing, M. (2006). Real people and virtual bodies: How disembodied can embodiment be? Minds & Machines, 16(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-006-9044-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooradian, N. (2006). Virtual reality, ontology, and value. Metaphilosophy, 37(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00460.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanay, B. (2016). Imagination and perception. In A. Kind (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of imagination (pp. 124–134). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, T. C., Seinfeld, S., Aglioti, S. M., & Slater, M. (2013). Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(3), 779–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petkova, V. L., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2008). If I were you: perceptual illusion of body swapping. Plos One, 3(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2006). Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 995–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmanowitz, N. (2016). Unconventional methods for a traditional setting: The use of virtual reality to reduce implicit racial bias in the courtroom. UNHL Rev, 15(1), 117–160.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, S., Pence, T., Irvine, N., & Guinn, C. 2019: ‘The effects of embodiment in virtual reality on implicit gender bias’. In J. Y. C. Chen & G. Fragomeni (Eds.) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Proceedings of 11th Internal Conference, VAMR 2019 (pp. 361–374).
   Google Scholar
• Sechrist, G., & Stangor, C. (2001). Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. (2017). Implicit learning through embodiment in immersive virtual reality. In D. Liu, C. Dede, R. Huang, & J. Richards (Eds.), Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education (pp. 19–34). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Spaulding, S. (2016). Simulation Theory. In A. Kind (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of imagination (pp. 262–273). Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (1984). Inquiry. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan Bissett, E. (2017). Biological function and epistemic normativity. Philosophical Explorations, 20(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2017.1287296
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan Bissett, E. (2018). Explaining doxastic transparency: Aim, norm, or function? Synthese, 195(8), 3453–3476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1377-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan Bissett, E. (2019). Biased by our imaginings. Mind & Language, 34(5), 627–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan Bissett, E. (2023). Implicit bias and processing. In R. Thompson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy and implicit cognition (pp. 115–126). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Toribio, J. (2018). Implicit bias: From social structure to representational format. Theoria, 33(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.17751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, N. (2011). Imagination is where the action Is. The Journal of Philosophy, 108(2), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil201110823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T., Lindsay, S., & Schooler, T. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar