Are noetic feelings embodied? The case for embodied metacognition

References

• Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Frank, D., Schwarzkopf, S., Fardo, F., Winston, J. S., Hauser, T. U., & Rees, G. (2016). Unexpected arousal modulates the influence of sensory noise on confidence. Elife, 5, 5. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.18103
   Google Scholar
• Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arango‐muñoz, S. (2018). Cognitive phenomenology and metacognitive feelings. Mind & Language, 34(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12215
   Google Scholar
• Armony, J., & Vuilleumier, P. (Eds.). (2013). The Cambridge handbook of human affective neuroscience. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beran, M. J., Brandl, J., Perner, J., & Proust, J. (Eds.). (2012). Foundations of metacognition. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burge, T. (2010). Origins of objectivity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, P. (2016). Are epistemic emotions metacognitive? Philosophical Psychology, 30(1–2), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1262536
   Google Scholar
• Chua, E. F., & Bliss-Moreau, E. (2016). Knowing your heart and your mind: The relationships between metamemory and interoception. Consciousness and Cognition, 45, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, E. F., Schacter, D. L., Rand-Giovannetti, E., & Sperling, R. A. (2006). Understanding metamemory: Neural correlates of the cognitive process and subjective level of confidence in recognition memory. Neuroimage, 29(4), 1150–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2007). Curing cognitive hiccups: A defense of the extended mind. The Journal of Philosophy, 104(4), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2007104426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, R., & Ashby, R. W. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of Systems Science, 1(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207727008920220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchley, H. D. (2002). Review: Electrodermal responses: What happens in the brain. The Neuroscientist, 8(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/107385840200800209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 351(1346), 1413–1420. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2000). The electrodermal system. In John T. Cacioppo, Louis G. Tassinary, & Gary G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed. pp. 200–223). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Sousa, R. (2017). Memory and emotion. In S. Bernecker & K. Michaelian (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of memory (pp. 154–165). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2008). Metacognition. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fiacconi, C. M., Kouptsova, J. E., & Köhler, S. (2017). A role for visceral feedback and interoception in feelings-of-knowing. Consciousness and Cognition, 53, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiacconi, C. M., Peter, E. L., Owais, S., & Köhler, S. (2016). Knowing by heart: Visceral feedback shapes recognition memory judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 145(5), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. The American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K., & Kiebel, S. (2009). Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1211–1221. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2006). How the body shapes the mind. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldinger, S. D., & Hansen, W. A. (2005). Remembering by the seat of your pants. Psychological Science, 16(7), 525–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01569.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hurley, S. L. (1998). Consciousness in action. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. 1989. Memory attributions. In Roediger, H. L., III, & F. Craik (Ed.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of endel tulving (pp. 391–422). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 118(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology, Vol I. Henry Holt and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, D. C., & Pouget, A. (2004). The bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends in Neurosciences, 27(12), 712–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9(2 Pt. 1), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2000.0433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. G. F. (2001). Out of the past: Episodic recall as retained acquaintance. In C. Hoerl & T. McCormack (Eds.), Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 257–284). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. (1993). Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model: Implications for Korsakoff amnesia. Psychological Review, 100(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.1.3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., & Son, L. K. (2012). Anoetic, Noetic, and Autonoetic Metacognition. In M. J. Beran, J. Brandl, J. Perner, & J. Proust (Eds.), Foundations of metacognition (pp. 289–301). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646739.003.0019
   Google Scholar
• Meyniel, F., Sigman, M., & Mainen, Z. F. (2015). Confidence as bayesian probability: From neural origins to behavior. Neuron, 88(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelian, K. (2016). Mental time travel: Episodic memory and our knowledge of the personal past. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelian, K., & Sutton, J., ”Memory”, In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ( Summer 2017 Edition), E. N. Zalta (Ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/memory/
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. L., Cleary, A. M., & Still, M. L. (2008). The role of autonomic arousal in feelings of familiarity. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1378–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 125–140). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60053-5
   Google Scholar
• Nussinson, R., & Koriat, A. (2008). Correcting experience-based judgments: The perseverance of subjective experience in the face of the correction of judgment. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9024-2
   Google Scholar
• Proust, J. (2013). The philosophy of metacognition: Mental agency and self-awareness. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Railton, P. (2017). At the core of our capacity to act for a reason: The affective system and evaluative model-based learning and control. Emotion Review, 9(4), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916670021
   Google Scholar
• Recanati, F. (2012). Mental files. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, S., Angstadt, P., & Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(2), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. L. (1994). Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03213977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. (2019). Embodied cognition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, A., Yeung, N., Heyes, C., & Frith, C. D. (2014). Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R., Thayer, J. F., Khalsa, S. S., & Lane, R. D. (2017). The hierarchical basis of neurovisceral integration. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 75, 274–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer, J. F., & Lane, R. D. (2009). Claude Bernard and the heart–brain connection: Further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009a). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence. Cognition & Emotion, 23(8), 1465–1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802420745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009b). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 138(1), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakiris, M., & De Preester, H. (Eds.). (2018). The interoceptive mind: From homeostasis to awareness. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381–403). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 26(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar