Comparative judgement for experimental philosophy: A method for assessing ordinary meaning in vehicles in the park cases

References

• Andow, J. (2015). How “intuition” exploded. Metaphilosophy, 46(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich D. (1978). Relationships Between the Thurstone and Rasch Approaches to Item Scaling. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(3), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167800200319
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, S. R., Ruesch, E. Y., Hartell, E., & Strimel, G. J. (2019). Identifying design values across countries through adaptive comparative judgment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 0123456789(2), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09506-8
   Google Scholar
• Bisson, M. J. (2022). Learning words with unfamiliar orthography: The role of cognitive abilities. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisson M, Gilmore C, Inglis M and Jones I. (2016). Measuring Conceptual Understanding Using Comparative Judgement. Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Ed., 2(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0024-3
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, R., & Terry, M. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. Biometrika, 39(3–4), 324–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramley, T. (2007). Paired comparison methods. In P. Newton, J.-A. Baird, H. Goldstein, H. Patrick, & P. Tymms (Eds.), Techniques for monitoring the comparability of examination standards (pp. 264–294). QCA.
   Google Scholar
• Chartrand, L. (2022). Modeling and corpus methods in experimental philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 17(6), e12837. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cova, F. (2023) The problem of low quality data on amazon mechanical Turk: A cautionary tale in experimental philosophy of free will. Blog post. The New X-Phi Blog. Retrieved May 9, 2023 https://xphiblog.com/the-problem-of-low-quality-data-on-amazon-mechanical-turk-a-cautionary-tale-in-experimental-philosophy-of-free-will/.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., Alcock, L., & Jones, I. (2021). What do mathematicians mean by proof? A comparative-judgement study of students’ and mathematicians’ views. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 61, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, E., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2017). Stereotypical inferences: Philosophical relevance and psycholinguistic toolkit. Ratio, 30(4), 411–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, E., Engelhardt, E. P., & Sytsma, J. (2021). Inappropriate stereotypical inferences? An adversarial collaboration in experimental ordinary language philosophy. Synthese, 198(11), 10127–10168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02708-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, L. L. (1958). Positivism and fidelity to law–A reply to Professor Hart. Harvard Law Review, 71(4), 630–672. https://doi.org/10.2307/1338226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grashuis J and Magnier A. (2018). Product differentiation by marketing and processing cooperatives: A choice experiment with cheese and cereal products. Agribusiness, 34(4), 813–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley N, Wright R E and Adamowicz V. (1998). Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3/4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008287310583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannikainen, I. R., Tobia, K. P., de Almeida, G. D. F., Struchiner, N., Kneer, M., Bystranowski, P., Dranseika, V., Strohmaier, N., Bensinger, S., Dolinina, K., Janik, B., Lauraitytė, E., Laakasuo, M., Liefgreen, A., Neiders, I., Próchnicki, M., Rosas, A., Sundvall, J., & Żuradzki, T. (2022). Coordination and expertise foster legal textualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(44). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2206531119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, N., Porter, J., & Francis, K. (2021). A corpus study of “know”: On the Verification of philosophers’ frequency claims about language. Episteme, 18(2), 242–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2019.15
   Google Scholar
• Hart, H. L. A. (1958). Positivism and the separation of Law and morals. Harvard Law Review, 71(4), 593–629. https://doi.org/10.2307/1338225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldsinger, S. A., & Humphry, S. M. (2013). Using calibrated exemplars in the teacher-assessment of writing: An empirical study. Educational Research, 55(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.825159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hittner, J. B., May, K., & Silver, N. C. (2003). A monte carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations. The Journal of General Psychology, 130(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300309601282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis, M., & Aberdein, A. (2015). Beauty is not simplicity: An analysis of mathematicians’ proof appraisals. Philosophia Mathematica, 23(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nku014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2013). On mathematicians’ different standards when evaluating elementary proofs. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(2), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. (2019). Philosophical intuitions are surprisingly robust across demographic differences. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 56(2), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201956225
   Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. (2023). Difference and robustness in the patterns of philosophical intuition across demographic groups. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 14, 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-023-00683-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobe, J., & Fraser, B. (2008). Causal judgments and moral judgment: Two experiments. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, the cognitive science of morality (Vol. 2, pp. 441–447). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnakumar, A. S. (2021). Metarules for ordinary meaning. Harvard Law Review Forum, 134(3), 167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. R., & Mouritsen, S. C. (2018). Judging ordinary meaning. The Yale Law Journal, 788–879. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2937468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. R., & Mouritsen, S. C. (2021). The corpus and the critics. The University of Chicago Law Review, 88(2), 275–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löwe, B., & Van Kerkhove, B. (2019). Methodological triangulation in empirical philosophy (of mathematics). In M. Inglis & A. Aberdein (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of logic and mathematics (pp. 15–37). Bloomsbury Methuen Drama. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350039049.0005
   Google Scholar
• Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. P. (2004). Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition, 92(3), B1–B12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, S., & Jones, I. (2015). A comparative judgement approach to teacher assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.978839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía Ramos, J. P., Evans, T., Rittberg, C., & Inglis, M. (2021). Mathematicians’ assessments of the explanatory value of proofs. Axiomathes, 31(5), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09545-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meskin, A., Phelan, M., Moore, M., & Kieran, M. (2013). Mere exposure to bad art. British Journal of Aesthetics, 53(2), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ays060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers‐Schulz, B., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2013). Knowing that P without believing that P. Noûs, 47(2), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pease, A., Aberdein, A., & Martin, U. (2019). Explanation in mathematical conversations: An empirical investigation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 377(2140), 20180159. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0159
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, K. (2011). Distinguishing the appearance from the reality of pain. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(9–10), 94–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sa, R., Alcock, L., Inglis, M., & Tanswell, F. (2023). Do mathematicians agree about mathematical beauty? Review of Philosophy and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-022-00669-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauer, F. (2008). A critical guide to vehicles in the park. New York Law Review, 83, 1109–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro S S and Wilk M B. (1965). An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soekhai V, de Bekker-Grob E W, Ellis A R and Vass C M. (2019). Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future. PharmacoEconomics, 37(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, R. (2021). Experimental jurisprudence. Science, 373(6553), 394–395. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf0711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadthagen-González, H., Parafita Couto, M. C., Párraga, C. A., & Damian, M. F. (2019). Testing alternative theoretical accounts of code-switching: Insights from comparative judgments of adjective–noun order. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(1), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006917728390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stich, S. P., & Machery, E. (2022). Demographic differences in philosophical intuition: A reply to Joshua Knobe. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 14(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00609-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struchiner, N., Hannikainen, I., & Almeida, G. (2020). An experimental guide to vehicles in the park. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(3), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500007130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sytsma, J. (2023). Prochownik, Karolina, Magen, Stefan. Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Law, Advances in Experimental Philosophy. (pp. 171–191). London: Bloomsbury .
   Google Scholar
• Tallant, J. (2013). Intuitions in physics. Synthese, 190(15), 2959–2980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0113-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanswell, F. S., & Inglis, M. (2023). The language of proofs: A philosophical corpus linguistics study of Instructions and Imperatives in mathematical texts. In B. Sriraman (Ed.), Handbook of the history and philosophy of mathematical practice (pp. 1–30). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tarricone, P., & Newhouse, C. P. (2016). Using comparative judgement and online technologies in the assessment and measurement of creative performance and capability. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0018-x
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. (1927). A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review, 34(4), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070288
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1954). The measurement of values. Psychological Review, 61(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobia, K. (2022). Experimental jurisprudence. The University of Chicago Law Review, 89(3), 735–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobia, K. P. (2020). Testing ordinary meaning. Harvard Law Review, 134(2), 726–806. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3266082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhavert S, Bouwer R, Donche V and De Maeyer S. (2019). A meta-analysis on the reliability of comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(5), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1602027
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemsen, P., & Reuter, K. (2021). Separating the evaluative from the descriptive: An empirical study of thick concepts. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 10(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.488
   Google Scholar
• Zeki, S., Romaya, J. P., Benincasa, D. M., & Atiyah, M. F. (2014). The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 68. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar