Connectionism and compositionality: Why Fodor and Pylyshyn were wrong

References

• Chalmers , D.J. 1990 . Syntactic transformations on distributed representations . Connection Science , 2 : 53 – 62 .
   Google Scholar
• Clark , A. 1989 . Microcognition , Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Elman , J.L. 1990 . “ Structured representations and connectionist models ” . In Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: computational and psycholinguistic perspectives , Edited by: Altmann , G. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Fodor , J.A. and Pylyshyn , Z. 1988 . Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis . Cognition , 28 : 3 – 71 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor , J.A. and Mclaughlin , B.P. 1990 . Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: why Smolensky's solution doesn't work . Cognition , 35 : 183 – 204 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin , S. and Garzon , M. 1990 . “ Neural computability ” . In Progress in Neural Networks , Edited by: Omidvar , O. Vol. 1 , Norwood, NJ : Ablex . Chapter 6
   Google Scholar
• Horgan , T.E. and Tienson , J.L. 1987 . Settling into a new paradigm . Southern Journal of Philosophy , 26 ( Supplement ) : 97 – 114 .
   Google Scholar
• Pollack , J.B. 1990 . Recursive distributed representations . Artificial Intelligence , 46 : 77 – 105 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolensky , P. 1987 . The constituent structure of connectionist mental states: a reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn . Southern Journal of Philosophy , 26 : 137 – 163 .
   Google Scholar
• Smolensky , P. 1990 . Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems . Artificial Intelligence , 46 : 159 – 216 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gelder , T. 1990 . Compositionality: a connectionist variation on a classical theme . Cognitive Science , : 14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar