Multiple enactments of method, divergent hinterlands and production of multiple realities in educational research

References

• Atkinson, P. (1996). Sociological readings and re-readings. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28, 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2009a, September 2–5). Disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity in the academic study of education: Comparing traditions of educational theorising. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Educational Research Association, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2009b). How to use pragmatism pragmatically? Suggestions for the 21st century. In A. G. Rud, J. Garrison, & L. Stone (Eds.), John Dewey at 150: Reflections for a new century (pp. 30–39). Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. (2009, September 2–5). Materialising theory: Does theory matter? Keynote symposium: The theory question in education. Presented at the annual conference of the British Educational Research Association, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., Biesta, G., & Thorpe, M. (2009). Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching: Communities, activites and networks (1st ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. J., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (Eds.). (2003). Reflexivity. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, J., & Hepburn, G. (1998). The course as a token: A construction of/by networks. Research in Science Education, 28, 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B. (2004). A nonhumanist disposition: On performativity, practical ontology and intervention. Configurations, 12, 229–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In K. Knorr Cetina, T. R. Schatzki, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175–188). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Circulating reference, sampling the soil in the Amazon forest. In Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies (1st ed., pp. 24–79). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life. The constitution of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2002). Objects and spaces. Theory Culture Society, 19, 91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2008). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miah, A. (2008). A critical history of posthumanism. In B. Gordijn & R. Chadwick (Eds.), Medical enhancement and posthumanity (pp. 71–94). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice (3rd ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, T., & Fisher, J. A. (2010). Benefits of “observer effects”: Lessons from the field. Qualitative Research, 10, 357–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimpiläinen, S. (2011). Knowledge in networks. International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation, 3, 46–56.
   Google Scholar
• Rimpiläinen, S. (2012). Gathering, translating, enacting. A study of interdisciplinary research and development practices in technology enhanced learning (Doctoral thesis). University of Stirling, Stirling.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In K. Knorr Cetina, T. R. Schatzki, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 42–55). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, P. H. (2009). Case study research in practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sismondo, S. (2009). An introduction to science and technology studies (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• The Ensemble Team. (2008). The original bid. Semantic technologies for the enhancement of case based learning: Case for support. Unpublished document.
   Google Scholar