Navigating the complexity of qualitative research in postmodern contexts: assemblage, critical reflexivity, and communion as guides

References

• Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137–162). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anthias, F. (2002). Where do I belong? Narrating collective identity and translocational positionality. Ethnicities, 2, 491–514.10.1177/14687968020020040301
   Google Scholar
• Asher, N. (2001). Beyond ‘cool’ and ‘hip’: Engaging the question of research and writing as academic Self-woman of color Other. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, L. A. (1997). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal, D. D. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 105–126.10.1177/107780040200800107
   Google Scholar
• Bettez, S. C. (2011). Critical community building: Beyond belonging. Educational Foundations, 25(3–4), 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bettez, S. C. (2012). But don’t call me white: Mixed race women exposing nuances of privilege and oppression politics. Amsterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brayboy, B. M. (2000). The Indian and the researcher: Tales from the field. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 415–426.10.1080/095183900413368
   Google Scholar
• Brayboy, B. M., & Deyhle, D. (2000). Insider–outsider: Researchers in American Indian communities. Theory Into Practice, 39, 163–169.10.1207/s15430421tip3903_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez, C. (2008). Conceptualizing from the inside: Advantages, complications, and demands on insider positionality. The Qualitative Report, 13, 474–494.
   Google Scholar
• DiAngelo, R., & Sensoy, Ö. (2009). “We don’t want your opinion”: Knowledge construction and the discourse of opinion in the equity classroom. Equity and Excellence in Education, 42, 443–455.10.1080/10665680903196354
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, G. (2001). Coming clean at the hyphen: Ethics and dialogue at a local community center. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 578–597.10.1177/107780040100700504
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. (2006). All quiet on the postmodern front? Studies in Philosophy and Education, 25, 273–278.10.1007/s11217-006-9001-7
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (1994). Working the hyphen: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (1st ed., pp. 70–82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M., Weiss, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. M. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107–132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, H. L. (2000). Writing the new ethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 261–280.10.1177/1077800403262360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hames-Garcia, M. (2011). Identity complex: Making the case for multiplicity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, W. (2010). Research and the ambiguity of reflexivity and ethical practice. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31, 307–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, P. M. (2007). The future of narrative. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 487–498.10.1177/1077800406297673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, C. (2010). Emotion and being a doctoral student. In P. Thompson & M. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral student’s companion (pp. 283–294). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. L. (2006). Representin(g): Negotiating multiple roles and identities in the field and behind the desk. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 926–949.10.1177/1077800406288613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchey, P. (1998). Finding freedom in the classroom: A practical introduction to critical theory. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (2002). Communion: The female search for love. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Hytten, K. (2004). Postcritical ethnography: Research as a pedagogical encounter. In G. W. Noblit, S. Y. Flores, & E. G. Murillo Jr. (Eds.), Postcritical ethnography: Reinscribing critique (pp. 95–105). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson Jr., J. L. (2004). An ethnographic filmflam: Giving gifts, doing research, and videotaping the native subject/object. American Anthropologist, 106, 32–42.10.1525/aa.2004.106.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2000). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 257–278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. (2010). “What a long, strange trip it’s been …”: Twenty-five years of qualitative and new paradigm research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Cannella, G. (2009). Ethics and the broader rethinking/reconceptualization of research as construct. Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies, 9, 273–285.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (Eds.). (2003). Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Linstead, S., & Pullen, A. (2006). Gender as multiplicity: Desire, displacement, difference and dispersion. Human Relations, 59, 1287–1310.10.1177/0018726706069772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo, D. (2006). Literacies of power: What Americans are not allowed to know (Expanded ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1999). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, E., & Venzant Chambers, T. T. (2010). Two researchers reflect on navigating multiracial identities in the research situation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 259–281.10.1080/09518390903196609
   Google Scholar
• Parameswaran, R. (2001). Feminist media ethnography in India: Exploring power, gender and culture in the field. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 69–103.10.1177/107780040100700104
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, J. T. (2000). Communion ecclesiology and black liberation theology. Theological Studies, 61, 672–699.10.1177/004056390006100404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. S. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175–196.10.1080/0951839032000060635
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. S. (2010). Dangerous reflexivity: Rigour, responsibility and reflexivity in qualitative research. In P. Thompson & M. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral student’s companion (pp. 270–282). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822390442
   Google Scholar
• Riach, K. (2009). Exploring participant-centred reflexivity in the research interview. Sociology, 43, 356–370.10.1177/0038038508101170
   Google Scholar
• Rice, S. (2009). Education for toleration in an era of zero tolerance school policies: A Deweyan analysis. Educational Studies, 45, 556–571.10.1080/00131940903338308
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., Taylor, V. A., & Whittier, N. (Eds.). (2001). Feminist frontiers: Rethinking sex, gender, and society (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C., Touchard, D., & Porter, M. (2002). What’s rapport got to do with it? The practical accomplishment of fieldwork relations between young female researchers and socially marginalized older men. The Qualitative Report, 7. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR7-1/russell.html
   Google Scholar
• Springwood, C. F., & King, C. R. (2001). Unsettling engagement: On the ends of rapport in critical ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 403–417.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A., & Roulston, K. (2006). The state of qualitative inquiry. A contested science. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 673–684.
   Google Scholar
• Subedi, B. (2006). Theorizing a ‘halfie’ researcher’s identity in transnational fieldwork. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 573–593.10.1080/09518390600886353
   Google Scholar
• Subreenduth, S., & Rhee, J. (2010). A porous, morphing, and circulatory mode of self–other: Decolonizing identity politics by engaging transnational reflexivity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 331–346.10.1080/09518390903156215
   Google Scholar
• Torre, M. E., & Fine, M. (2008). Participatory action research in the contact zone. In J. Cammarota & M. Fine (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 23–44). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Villenas, S. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization and co-option in the field. Harvard Education Review, 66, 711–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavella, P. (1997). Feminist insider dilemmas: Constructing ethnic identity with ‘Chicana’ informants. In L. Lamphere, H. Ragone, & P. Zavella (Eds.), Situated lives: Gender and culture in everyday life (pp. 42–61). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar