Post-qualitative line of flight and the confabulative conversation: a methodological ethnography

References

• Åsberg, C. (2012). Läskunnighet bortom humanioras bekvämlighetszoner. En inledning [Literacy beyond the humanities comfort-zones. An introduction]. In C. Åsberg, M. Hultman, & F. Lee (Eds.), Post-humanistiska nyckeltexter [ Post-human key texts] (pp. 7–22). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, L. R. (2008). Difference and givenness: Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism and the ontology of immanence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2011). Samhällsvetenskapliga metoder [Social research methods]. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2002). Understanding Deleuze. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2005). Philosophy and post-structuralist theory: From Kant to Deleuze. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622276.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Introduction: Deleuze and research methodologies. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodology (pp. 1–22). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. London: Athlone.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure immanence: Essays on a life. New York, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2004). The logic of sense. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2012). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dyke, S. (2013). Disrupting ‘Anorexia Nervosa’: An ethnography of the Deleuzian event. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodology (pp. 145–163). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fotopoulou, A., Conway, M., & Solms, M. (2007). Confabulation: Motivated reality monitoring. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2180–2190.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., & Taguchi, H. L. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 525–542.10.1080/09518398.2010.500628
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, L. (2014). Röster och rörelse: Fokusgruppen som postkvalitativ metod [Voices and movements: The focus group interview as a post-qualitative method]. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 19, 110–131.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 629–633.10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. (2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 732–740.10.1080/09518398.2013.788761
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L., & McCoy, K. (2010). Thinking with Deleuze in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 503–509.10.1080/09518398.2010.500634
   Google Scholar
• Michell, L. (1999). Combining focus groups and interviews: Telling how it is, telling how it feels. In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research. Politics, theory and practice (pp. 36–46). Gateshead: Athenaeum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152.10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, L. M. (2009). Movement and experimentation in young children’s learning: Deleuze and Guattari in early childhood education. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Pascale, C. (2011). Cartographies of knowledge: Exploring qualitative epistemologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. (2010). Is ‘the posthuman’ educable? On the convergence of educational philosophy, animal studies, and posthuman theory. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31, 237–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Semetsky, I. (2006). Deleuze, education and becoming. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, J. (1998). Collecting and analysing qualitative data: Issues raised by the focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 345–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (1997a). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 175–189.10.1080/095183997237278
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (1997b). Nomadic inquiry in the smooth spaces of the field: A preface. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 365–383.10.1080/095183997237179
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (1997c). Circling the text: Nomadic writing practices. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 403–417.10.1177/107780049700300403
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research. The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 611–625). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, H. L. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, H. L. (2012). A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data. Feminist Theory, 13, 265–281.10.1177/1464700112456001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (2013). Mobile sections and flowing matter in participant-generated video: Exploring a Deleuzian approach to visual sociology. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodology (pp. 42–60). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. M. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wibeck, V. (2000). Fokusgrupper: om fokuserade gruppintervjuer som undersökningsmetod [Focus groups: About focused group interviews as methods of inquiry]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar