To perceive and to be perceived: challenges of ethnography in elite schools

References

• Abric, J.-C. (2003). La recherche du noyau central et de la zone muette des représentations sociales [Researching the central core of the muted zone of social representations]. In J.-C. Abric (Ed.), Méthodes d’étude des représentations sociales (pp. 59–80). Ramonville-Saint-Agne: Érès.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. (2003). Lost geographies of power. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470773321
   Google Scholar
• Angrosino, M. (2005). Recontextualizing observation: Ethnography, pedagogy, and the prospects for a progressive political agenda. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 729–745). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. (1992). Understanding ethnographic texts. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412986403
   Google Scholar
• Augé, M. (1994). Pour une anthropologie des mondes contemporains [For an anthropology of contemporary worlds]. Paris: Aubier.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelard, G. (1966). Le nouvel esprit scientifique [The new scientific spirit]. Paris: Presses Universitaires Françaises.
   Google Scholar
• Beaud, S. (1996). Les “bacs pro” [Professional highschools]. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 114, 21–29.10.3406/arss.1996.3191
   Google Scholar
• Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benguigui, G. (2000). L’observation des incidents et des crises [Observing incidents and crises]. Sociétés contemporaines, 40, 135–149.10.3406/socco.2000.1817
   Google Scholar
• Bizeul, D. (2007). Que faire des expériences d'enquête? [What to do with survey experiences?] Revue française de science politique, 57, 69–89.10.3917/rfsp.571.0069
   Google Scholar
• Bonnet, F. (2008). La distance sociale dans le travail de terrain : compétence stratégique et compétence culturelle dans l’interaction d’enquête [Social distance in fieldwork: Strategic and cultural skills in survey interactions]. Genèses, 73, 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique [Practical sense]. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M., Burton, A., Ferguson, A. A., Fox, K. J., Gamson, J., Gartrell, N., & Ui, S. (1991). Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cefaï, D., Costey, P., Gardella, E., Gayet-Viaud, C., Gonzalez, Ph., Le Méner, E., & Terzi, C. (2010). L’Engagement ethnographique [Ethnographic engagement]. Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS.
   Google Scholar
• Chaussecourte, P. (2006). Une observation d’enseignante inspirée de la méthode d’Esther Bick [A teacher's observation inspired by the Esther Bick method]. Connexions, 86, 49–65.10.3917/cnx.086.0049
   Google Scholar
• Ciccone, A. (1998). L’observation clinique [Clinical observation]. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Clair, R. P. (1998). Organizing silence: A world of possibilities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Courtois, A. (2013). Becoming elite: Exclusion, excellence and collective identity in Ireland’s top fee-paying schools. In J. Abbink & T. Salverda (Eds.), The anthropology of elites: Power, cultures and the complexities of distinction (pp. 163–184). Basingtoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Delphy, C. (1995). L'état d'exception: la dérogation au droit commun comme fondement de la sphère privée [An exceptional state: The derogation of common law for the private sphere]. Nouvelles Questions Féministes, 4, 73–114.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781452243672
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Devereux, G. (1967). De l’angoisse à la méthode dans les sciences du comportement [From anxiety to method in the behavioral sciences]. Paris: Aubier.
   Google Scholar
• Dexter, L. A. (1970/2006). Elite and specialized interviewing. Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, M. (2003). Is there a ruling class in France? In M. Dogan (Ed.), Elite configurations at the apex of power (pp. 17–90). Boston, MA: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, M. (2005). L'action scientifique: modèles interprétatifs et explicatifs en sociologie des sciences [Scientific action: Interpretative models and explanations in the sociology of the sciences]. L'Année sociologique, 55, 103–125.10.3917/anso.051.0103
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (1996). Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Favret-Saada, J. (1990). Être affecté [To be impacted]. Gradhiva, 8, 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S., & Breuer, J. (1893/2002). Le mécanisme psychique de phénomènes hystériques [On the psychical mechanism of hysterical phenomena]. In Études sur l’hystérie [Studies on hysteria] (pp. 1–13). Paris: Presses Universitaires Françaises (in French).
   Google Scholar
• Freymond, N., Meyer, D., & Merrone, G. (2003). Ce qui donne sens à l'interdisciplinarité [That which makes meaning of interdisciplinarity]. A contrario, 1, 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967/2007). Studies in ethnomethodology. Paris: Presses Universitaires Francaises.
   Google Scholar
• Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2009). The best of the best: Becoming elite at American boarding school. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaztambide-Fernandez, R., & Howard, A. (2012). Access, status, and representation: Reflections from two ethnographic studies of elite schools. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 43, 345–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guigue, M. (2012). L'émergence des interprétations : une épistémologie des traces [Arising interpretations: An epistemology of traces]. Les Sciences de l'éducation -Pour l'Ère nouvelle, 45, 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, F. (1996). Masculin/féminin. La pensée de la différence [Masculin/feminine. Thoughts on the difference]. Paris: O. Jacob.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggart, R. (1957). The uses of literacy. London: Chatto & Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, E. (1960). Le regard sociologique [The sociological perspective]. Paris: EHESS.
   Google Scholar
• Jorion, P. (1974). Quelques réflexions sur les conditions de l’enquête de terrain en anthropologie sociale [A few reflections on the conditions of field studies in social anthropology]. Revue de l’Institut de sociologie, 4, 619–639.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. (2010). Du comment au pourquoi. Description lumineuse et inférence causale en ethnographie [The how and why. Illuminating description and causal inference in ethnography]. In D.Cefaï (Ed.), L’engagement ethnographique (pp. 43–105). Paris: EHESS.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, A. (1992). Collaborative research among the Kickapoo tribe of Oklahoma. Human Organization, 51, 274–283.10.17730/humo.51.3.k3n65x64t5nx36x5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1994). Une sociologie sans objet? Remarques sur l’interobjectivité [Sociology without an object? Remarks on interobjectivity]. Sociologie du travail, 4, 585–607.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1988). La vie de laboratoire. La production des faits scientifiques [The life of a laboratory. The production of scientific facts]. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Leiris, M. (1934/1981). L’Afrique fantôme [Africa ghost]. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Lerum, K. (2001). Subjects of desire: Academic armor, intimate ethnography. Les Sciences de l'éducation, 4, 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. (1950). L’œuvre de Marcel Mauss [Introduction to the work of Marcel Mauss]. Cahiers internationaux de Sociologie, 8, 72–112.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, B. (1922/1989). Les Argonautes du Pacifique occidental [The Argonautes of the western pacific]. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. (1997). The uses of complicity in the changing mise-en-scène of anthropological fieldwork. Reflections, 59, 85–108.
   Google Scholar
• McGrane, B. (1989). Beyond anthropology. Society and the other. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercader, P. (2011). Pour une heuristique de la partialité [Partiality as an asset in the social sciences]. In G. Gaillard, P. Mercader, & J.-M. Talpin (Eds.), La partialité comme atout dans les sciences humaines (pp. 15–29). Paris: Inpress.
   Google Scholar
• Molinier, P., & Flottes, A. (2012). Travail et santé mentale: approches cliniques [Work and mental health: Clinical approaches]. Travail et Emploi, 129, 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Payet, J.-P. (2005). Moralisme et expertise: la double tentation de l'ethnographie [Moralism and expertise: The double temptation of ethnography]. Education et sociétés, 2, 167–175.
   Google Scholar
• Pestre, D. (2002). L'évolution des champs de savoir, interdisciplinarité et noyaux durs [Evolution in the fields of knowledge, interdisciplinarity and hard cores]. Communication au Conseil scientifique du CNRS (14 January 2002). Natures Sciences Sociétés, 2, 191–196.
   Google Scholar
• Pinçon, M., & Pinçon-Charlot, M. (1997). Voyage en grande bourgeoisie: journal d’enquête [Travel within the grande bourgeoisie: Field journal]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Prat, R. (2006). Entre “patate chaude” et “au feu les pompiers”: quels développements pour une fonction contenante [Between a hot potato and calling the firefighters: Developments towards a containing function]. In P. Delion (Ed.), L’observation du bébé selon Esther Bick (pp. 155–188). Toulouse: Eres.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, G. (1975/1998). The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex. In R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 157–210). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schijf, H. (2013). Researching elites: Old and new perspectives. In J. Abbink & T. Salverda (Eds.), The anthropology of elites: Power, culture, and the complexities of distinction (pp. 29–44). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. E. (2006). Problematising power relations in “elite” interviews. Geoforum, 37, 643–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tisseron, S. (2006). De la honte qui tue à la honte qui sauve [From the shame that kills to the shame that saves]. Le Coq-héron, 184, 18–31.10.3917/cohe.184.31
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. (1995). Representation in ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vienne, P. (2005). Mais qui a peur de l'ethnographie scolaire? [But who is scared of the school ethnographer?] Education et sociétés, 2, 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (1994). Le gang comme prédateur collectif [The gang as a collective predactor]. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 101, 88–100.10.3406/arss.1994.3088
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (2013). Entrer chez les autres: un processus de négociation d’entrée sur le terrain [Going inside others: Negotiating the process of being accepted in the field]. Recherches qualitatives. Hors-Série. Du singulier à l’universel, 15, 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.recherche-qualitative.qc.ca/Revue.html
   Google Scholar
• Wittig, M. (1982). Avant-note au recueil de Djuna Barnes [Preliminary note to the Djuna Barnes collection]. La passion. Paris: Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, D. L. (1996). Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In D. L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 1–55). Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar