What's in the 'co'? Tending the tensions in co-creative inquiry in social work education

References

• Adams, P. (1977). Fatal necessity: British intervention in Aotearoa New Zealand 1830–1847. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aubert, A. & Soler, M. (2006). Dialogism: the dialogic turn in the social sciences. In J. Kincheloe & R. Horn (Eds.), The Præger handbook of education and psychology (pp. 521–529). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. (C. Emerson, Ed. and Trans). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 22, 3–18.10.1080/0729436032000056571
   Google Scholar
• Buick, T L. (1916). The treaty of Waitangi: Or how Aotearoa New Zealand became a British colony.
   Google Scholar
• Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, N. & Dahlgren, P. (2011). Introduction: Interrogating Audiences –Theoretical Horizons of Participation. Communication Management Quarterly, 6, 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, K. & Holquist, M. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, F. (Ed.). (2010). Public participation and better environmental decisions: The promise and limits of participatory processes for the quality of environmentally related decision-making. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 247–259.10.1080/09518390701281751
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2010). Governmentality and academic work shaping the hearts and minds of academic workers. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 26, 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., Gottsche, M., & Bansel, P. (2006). The rise and fall of the neo-liberal university. European Journal of Education, 41, 305–319.10.1111/ejed.2006.41.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S., & Simpson, J. (2004). Critical organizational dialogue: Open formation and the demand of “Otherness”. In R. Anderson, L. Baxter, & K. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 141–158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483328683
   Google Scholar
• Deignan, T. (2009). Enquiry-based learning: Perspectives on practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 14, 13–28.10.1080/13562510802602467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, A., Kjølberg, K., & Wickson, F. (2011). Public engagement coming of age: from theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 20, 826–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York, NY: D. C. Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T. & Stern, P. C. (Eds.). (2008). Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durie, M. (1998). Te Mana, Te Kāwanatanga; The politics of Māori self-determination. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, M., & Pal, M. (2010). Dialog theory in marginalized settings: A subaltern studies approach. Communication Theory, 20, 363–386.10.1111/comt.2010.20.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallis, G. (2011). Multiversities, ideas and democracy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 109–134). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the college de France, 1975–76. London: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Olin, W. E. (Eds.). (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K. (Ed.). (2008). The methodological dilemma: Creative, critical and collaborative approaches to qualitative research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gayá Wicks, P., & Reason, P. (2009). Initiating action research: Challenges and paradoxes of opening communicative space. Action Research, 7: 243–262.10.1177/1476750309336715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2009). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia. In R. Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections (pp. 228–244). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, A., Puigvert, L., & Flecha, R. (2011). Critical communicative methodology: Informing real social transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 235–245.10.1177/1077800410397802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, S., Anderson, R., & Cissna, K. (2003). The problematics of dialogue and power. In P. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 27, 125–157. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2006). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research “with” rather than “on” people. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), In handbook of action research (pp. 144–154). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. (2006). The politics of talk: coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance. Social Studies of Science, 36, 299–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. W. & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41, 30–35.10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1986). Using learning contracts: Practical approaches to individualizing and structuring learning. London: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Larner, W., & Le Heron, R. (2005). Neo-liberalizing spaces and subjectivities: Reinventing New Zealand universities. Organization, 12, 843–862.10.1177/1350508405057473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2013). Research policy and academic performativity: Compliance, contestation and complicity. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 1162–1174.10.1080/03075079.2013.833025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840272
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, C. (2012). If you’re so smart, Why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry, 38, 599–629.10.1086/664553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2011). Qualitative inquiry: where are the ruins? Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 997–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, P. (2002). Te ara kī te Tiriti [The path to the treaty of Waitangi]. Auckland: David Ling.
   Google Scholar
• Napan, K. (2009, September 28–30) Academic co-creative inquiry: Creating inclusive processes for learning. Refereed proceedings from Educational Integrity Conference, University of Wollongong, Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Napan, K. (2010). When students do their best – Outlining the qualities that engender the spirit of social work education. In D. M. Maglajlić (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th anniversary conference the IUC Dubrovnik School of social work theory and practice, June 28–July 4, 2009: 20th anniversary conference Dubrovnik (pp. 27–41). Dubrovnik: IUC (Inter-University Centre).
   Google Scholar
• Napan, K. (2013). Walking the talk in social work education. In C. Noble, M. Henrickson, & I. Young Han (Eds.), Social work education: Voices from the Asia Pacific (2nd modified ed.) (pp. 227–303). Sydney: Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Napan, K. (2014). Co-creating learning: A comparative analysis of two integrative and collaborative methods of teaching/learning social work. In N. Bala Raju & Z. Hatta (Eds.), Social work scholarship in education and practice: Innovations from the Asia Pacific (pp 143–164). Surrey: Primrose Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 313–345.10.1080/02680930500108718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orange, C. (1989). The story of a treaty. Wellington: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Orange, C. (1990). An illustrated history of the treaty of Waitangi. Wellington: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Pauly, J. (2004). Media studies and the dialogue of democracy. In R. Anderson, L. Baxter, & K. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 243–258). London: Sage.10.4135/9781483328683
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. (2011). The promise of dialogue: The dialogic turn in the production and communication of knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/ds.12
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, L., Carvalho, A., & Doyle, J. (2012). Citizen voices: Performing public participation in science and environment communication. Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, L., Kristiansen, M., Vehvilainen, M., & Gunnarsson, E. (Eds.). (2013). Knowledge and power in collaborative research: A reflexive approach. Routledge advances in research methods series. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2002). Calls for dialogue. In N. Roberts (Ed.), The transformative power of dialogue (pp. 3–24). Oxford: Elsevier Science.10.1016/S0732-1317(02)12003-3
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S., & Dale, R. (2002). Local states of emergency: The contradictions of neo-liberal governance in education in New Zealand. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23, 463–482.10.1080/0142569022000015472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D. (1975). Ask that mountain: The story of Parihaka. Auckland: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. (2010). Beyond the multiversity: Neoliberalism and the rise of the schizophrenic university. Social Anthropology, 18, 15–29.10.1111/(ISSN)1469-8676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2000). Coercive accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher education. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy (pp. 57–89). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, M. (1990). Nga Tohu O Te Tiriti/making a mark: The signatories to the treaty of Waitangi. Wellington: National Library of Aotearoa New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, B., & Taylor, A. (2007). Mobilizing knowledge through partnerships. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 23, 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education, 35, 723–740.10.1080/03075070903315502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2008). Who is ready for the results? Reflections on the multivoicedness of useful research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21, 3–18.10.1080/09518390701768757
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2008). ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: Power, participation and pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology. Science, Technology and Human Values, 33, 262–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000). Audit cultures. Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, C. (2010). Participation as post-fordist politics: Demos, new labour, and science policy. Minerva, 48, 389–411.10.1007/s11024-010-9157-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20, 941–957.10.1287/orsc.1090.0435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. (2004). Ka whawhai tonu matou [Struggle without end] (rev ed.). Auckland: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, J., & Willis, R. (2004). See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (2006). Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science – hitting the notes but missing the music? Community Genetics, 9, 211–220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar