The fetish of the lens: persistent sexist and ableist metaphor in education research

References

• Abrams, M. H. (1981). A glossary of literary terms (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Holt-Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, J. (2015). Inclusion as an ethical project. In S. Tremain (Ed.), Foucault and the Government of Disability: Enlarged and Revised Edition (pp. 281–297). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, M. (1990). How not to do things with Metaphors we live by. College English, 52, 495–506
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822388128
   Google Scholar
• Bartolomé, L. I. (1994). Beyond the methods Fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 173–195.10.17763/haer.64.2.58q5m5744t325730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. E., He, Y., & Levin, B. B. (2011). Developing critical cultural competence: A guide for 21st-century educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. (2012). Through the looking glass: Critical theory in practice. Lyttleton, NZ: New Zealand Association for Teaching for English.
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L. (2015). Conceptualising inclusive pedagogy: The inclusive pedagogical approach in action. In J. Deppeler, T. Loreman, R. Smith, & L. Florian (Eds.), Inclusive pedagogy across the curriculum, Vol. 7 (pp. 11–24). Bingley, UK: Emerald.10.1108/ipie
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777–795.10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (2012). Metaphor and thought: The state of the art. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (3rd ed., pp. 3–13). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Google Scholar. (2016). Metaphors we live by. Retrieved September 8, 2016 from https://scholar.google.com.au/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=KEU0vpcAAAAJ&citation_for_view=KEU0vpcAAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C
   Google Scholar
• Grumet, M. R. (1988). Bitter milk. Amherst: University of Massachussets Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1997). The spectacle of the other. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 223–290). London: Sage/The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 634–645.10.1080/09518398.2013.788753
   Google Scholar
• Macoun, A., & Miller, D. (2014). Surviving (thriving) in academia: Feminist support networks and women ECRs. Journal of Gender Studies, 23, 287–301.10.1080/09589236.2014.909718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. (2013). Materialist mappings of knowing in being: Researchers constituted in the production of knowledge. Gender and Education, 25, 776–785.10.1080/09540253.2013.824072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, L. (2015a). Is the frame broken? Seeking new metaphors for textual study in English. English in Australia, 50, 7–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, L. (2015). Still in the LEGO (LEGOS) room: Female teachers designing curriculum around girls’ popular culture for the coeducational classroom in Australia. Gender and Education, 27, 909–927. doi:10.1080/09540253.2015.1096920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalko, R. (2009). The excessive appearance of disability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22, 65–74.10.1080/09518390802581885
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16, 6–18.10.1093/screen/16.3.6
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A. (2016). Four common claims about education funding and quality that need examining. The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/four-common-claims-about-education-funding-and-quality-that-need-explaining-64480
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., & St Pierre, E. A. (2008). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 473–499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. (2012). Critical disability studies: Rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity. In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 30–41). New York, NY: London.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spender, D. (1982). Women of ideas and what men have done to them. London, UK: Pandora Press.
   Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A. (2012). Another postmodern report on knowledge: Positivism and its others. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15, 483–503.10.1080/13603124.2012.696710
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 646–657.10.1080/09518398.2013.788754
   Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A. (2014). Post qualitative inquiry: Keynote lecture. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education/New Zealand Association for Research in Education, December, Brisbane, Australia. http://www.aare.edu.au/publications-database.php/9609/post-qualitative-inquiry
   Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 715–719.10.1177/1077800414532435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2016). VCE Literature: Implementation briefing 2016: Units 3 and 4 [Presentation]. Melbourne: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. (1993). Ignorance in educational research or, how can you not know that? Educational Researcher, 22, 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Whitburn, B. (2014). The indelible ink of the special stamp: An insider’s research essay on imprints and erasures. Disability and Society, 29, 624–637.10.1080/09687599.2013.844097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitburn, B. (2015a). Critical engagement with insider accounts of inclusive schooling (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Deakin University, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Whitburn, B. (2015b). The ‘included’ subjectivities of students with disabilities in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Advance online publication. doi 10.1080/01596306.2015.1105787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar