608
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Neo-positivist intrusions, post-qualitative challenges, and PAR’S generative indeterminacies

Pages 488-503 | Received 16 May 2016, Accepted 10 Feb 2017, Published online: 07 Apr 2017

References

  • Ado, K. (2013). Action research: Professional development to help support and retain early career teachers. Educational Action Research, 21, 131–146.10.1080/09650792.2013.789701
  • Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Anderson, G. L., & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28, 12–40.10.3102/0013189X028005012
  • Anderson, G. L., Herr, K., & Nihlen, A. (1994/2007). Studying your own school: An educator’s guide to practitioner action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Anyon, J. (2014). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Apple, M. W. (2005). Education, markets, and an audit culture. Critical Quarterly, 47, 11–29.10.1111/criq.2005.47.issue-1-2
  • Ball, S. (2012). Global education Inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. London: Routledge.
  • Ball, S. J. (2013). The education debate (2nd ed.). Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Barad, K. M. (2007). Meeting the universe half-way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822388128
  • Barad, K. (2015). Transmaterialities: Trans/matter/realities and queer political imaginings. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21, 387–422.
  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Biesta, G. (2007). Education and the democratic person: Towards a political conception of democratic education. Teachers College Record, 3, 740–769.
  • Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Britzman, D. P. (1995). “The question of belief”: Writing poststructural ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8, 229–238.10.1080/0951839950080302
  • Britzman, D. P. (2006). Novel education: Psychoanalytic studies of learning and non-learning. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
  • Brown, T., & Jones, L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism: Congruence and critique. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
  • Brydon-Miller, M., & Maguire, P. (2009). Participatory action research: Contributions to the development of practitioner inquiry in education. Educational Action Research, 17, 79–93.10.1080/09650790802667469
  • Burnard, P., Apelgren, B.-M., & Cabaroglu, N. (2015). Transforming teacher research: Theory and practice for the C21st. Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.10.5422/fso/9780823225033.001.0001
  • Butler, J. (2015). Senses of the subject. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
  • Cahill, C. (2007). The personal is political: Developing new subjectivities through participatory action research. Gender, Place & Culture, 14, 267–292.10.1080/09663690701324904
  • Cameron, J., & Gibson, K. (2005). Participatory action research in a poststructuralist vein. Geoforum, 36, 315–331.10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.06.006
  • Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education knowledge and action Research. London: The Falmer Press.
  • Caughie, P. (1992). "Not Entirely Strange,... Not Entirely Friendly": Passing and pedagogy. College English, 54, 775–793.10.2307/378258
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Collins, P. H. (2012). On intellectual activism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Davies, B. (2005). The (im)possibility of intellectual work in neoliberal regimes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(1), 1–14.
  • Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 20, 247–259.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Original work published 1972.
  • Demerath, P. (2006). The science of context: Modes of response for qualitative researchers in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 97–113.10.1080/09518390500450201
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ebert, T. L. (1991). The “difference” of postmodern feminism. College English, 53, 886–904.10.2307/377692
  • Eisner, E. (1994). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 297–325.10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250
  • Fals-Borda, O. (1979). Investigating reality in order to transform it: The Colombian experience. Dialectical Anthropology, 4, 33–55.10.1007/BF00417683
  • Fals-Borda, O. (1987). The application of participatory action-research in Latin America. International Sociology, 2, 329–347.10.1177/026858098700200401
  • Fals-Borda, O. (2006). Participatory (action) research in social theory: Origins and challenges. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 27–37). London: Sage.
  • Fine, M., & Torre, M. E. (2004). Re-membering exclusions: Participatory action research in public institutions. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 15–37.
  • Freire, P. (1974). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury Press.
  • Gatenby, B., & Humphries, M. (2000). Feminist participatory action research. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23, 89–105.10.1016/S0277-5395(99)00095-3
  • Giroux, H. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 425–464.
  • Glass, R. D., & Newman, A. (2015). Ethical and epistemic dilemmas in knowledge production: Addressing their intersection in collaborative, community-based research. Theory and Research in Education, 13, 23–37.10.1177/1477878515571178
  • Greco, M., & Stenner, P. (Eds.). (2008). Emotions: A social science reader. London: Routledge.
  • Gregg, M., & Siegworth, G. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Grosz, E. (2004). The nick of time. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822386032
  • Haig-Brown, C. (2009). Decolonizing diaspora: Whose traditional land are we on? Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry, 1, 4–21.
  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.10.2307/3178066
  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hekman, S. (2014). The feminine subject. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2008). Teacher research and learning communities: A failure to theorize power relations. Language Arts, 85, 382–391.
  • Johnston, M. (1997). Contradictions in collaboration: New thinking on school/university partnerships. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Kemmis, S. (2006). Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educational Action Research, 14, 459–476.10.1080/09650790600975593
  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567–605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lang, J. C. (2010). Feminist epistemologies of situated knowledges: Implications for rhetorical argumentation. Informal Logic, 30, 309–334.
  • Lather, P. (2006). Foucauldian scientificity: Rethinking the nexus of qualitative research and educational policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 783–791.10.1080/09518390600976006
  • Lather, P. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Lather, P. (2009). Against empathy, voice and authenticity. In A. Y. Jackson & L. A. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in qualitative research: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 17–26). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lather, P. (2010). Engaging (social) science: Policy from the side of the messy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Lather, P. (2013). Methodology 2.1: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 634–645.10.1177/1532708616634734
  • Lather, P. (2016). Top ten+ list: (Re)thinking ontology in (post) qualitative research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 125–131.10.1177/1532708616634734
  • Lather, P., & St.Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 629–633.10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
  • Levine-Rasky, C. (2015). Research for/about/with the community: A montage. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 15, 455–467.10.1177/1532708615572359
  • Luke, C., & Gore, J. (1992). Feminisms and critical pedagogies. New York, NY: Routldege.
  • Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). Writing as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mazzei, L. A. (2013). A voice without organs : Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 732–740.10.1080/09518398.2013.788761
  • Mazzei, L. A. (2016). Voice without a subject. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 1–11.
  • McNiff, J. (2016). You and your action research project (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Miller, J. L. (1990). Creating spaces and finding voices: Teachers collaborating for empowerment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Miller, J. L. (2005). Sounds of silence breaking: Women, autobiography, curriculum. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Miller, J. L. (2014). Curriculum theorizing in the throes of the audit culture. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 16, 13–30.
  • Morrell, E. (2007). Youth participatory action research, civic engagement, and educational reform: Lessons from the IDEA seminar. In J. Camarrota & M. Fine (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 155–185). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Moss, P., Phillips, D. C., Erickson, F., Floden, R., Lather, P., & Schneider, B. (2009). Learning from our differences: A dialogue across perspectives on quality in education research. Educational Researcher, 38, 501–517.10.3102/0013189X09348351
  • Noffke, S. E., & Somekh, B. (Eds.). (2009). The Sage handbook of educational action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Padgett, D. K. (Ed.). (2017). Qualitative methods in social work research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pedwell, C., & Whitehead, A. (2012). Affecting feminism: Questions of feeling in feminist theory. Feminist Theory, 13, 115–129.10.1177/1464700112442635
  • Pollock, D. (2009). Beyond experience. Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies, 9, 636–646.10.1177/1532708609338036
  • Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Ravitch, D. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. New York, NY: Knopf.
  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008). Sage handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Scott, J. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry, 17, 773–797.10.1086/448612
  • Simpson, A. (2007). On ethnographic refusal: Indigeneity, ‘voice’ and colonial citizenship. Junctures: The Journal for Thematic Dialogue, 9, 67–80.
  • Smith, L. T. (1999/2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
  • Smith, S. (2012). Reading the posthuman backwards: Mary Rowlandson’s doubled witnessing. Biography, 35, 137–152.10.1353/bio.2012.0004
  • Sonu, D. (2011). Breathing spaces in neoliberal places. JCT: Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 27, 308–316.
  • Stenhouse, L. (1983). Research as a basis for teaching. In L. Stenhouse (Ed.), Authority, education and emancipation (pp. 177–195). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 611–625). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 646–657.10.1080/09518398.2013.788754
  • St. Pierre, E. A., Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. A. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 99–110.10.1177/1532708616638694
  • St.Pierre, E. A. (2006). Scientifically based research in education: epistemology and ethics. Adult Education Quarterly, 56, 239–266.10.1177/0741713606289025
  • Stringer, E. T. (1999). Action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Stronach, I., & MacLure, M. (1997). Educational research undone: The postmodern embrace. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Taubman, P. M. (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Tuana, N. (2001). Material locations. In Nancy Tuana & Sandi Morgen (Eds.), Engendering rationalities (pp. 221–243). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Tuck, E. (2009). Re-visioning action: Participatory action research and indigenous theories of change. The Urban Review, 41, 47–65.10.1007/s11256-008-0094-x
  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (Eds.). (2013). Youth resistance research and theories of change. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 811–818.10.1177/1077800414530265
  • Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.