‘To my relations’: writing and refusal toward an Indigenous Epistolary Methodology

References

• Anzaldua, G. (1981). Speaking in tongues: A letter to third world women writers. In C. Moraga & G. Anzaldua (Eds.), This bridge called my back: Writings by radical Women of Color (pp. 163–171). New York, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archuleta, E. (2006). “I give you back”: Indigenous Women writing to survive. Studies in American Indian Literatures, 18(4), 88–114.10.1353/ail.2007.0000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana Feminist Epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 555–583.10.17763/haer.68.4.5wv1034973g22q48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, A. (2000). Dear-: In search of new (old) forms of critical address. In A. Gilroy & W. Verhoeven (Eds.), Epistolary histories (pp. 155–175). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, C. M. (1999). Native American higher education in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, C. S., & Carey, D. C. (2013). Academic mothers on leave (but on the clock), on the line (and off the record): Toward improving parental-leave policies and practices. In M. Castaneda & K. Isgro (Eds.), Mothers in academia (pp. 200–212). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1996). Letters to Cristina: Reflections on my life and work. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. 1978. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez y Muhs, G., Niemann Flores, Y., Gonzalez, C. (Ed.). (2012). Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lomawaima, K. T., & McCarty, T. L. (2006). To remain an Indian: Lessons in democracy from a century of Native American education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, S. R. (2000). Rhetorical sovereignty: What do American Indians want from writing? College Composition and Communication, 51(3), 447–468.10.2307/358744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihesuah, D. A. (2003). Indigenous American women: Decolonization, empowerment, activism. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). (pp. 923–948). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, S. (2014). The power of ancestral stories on mothers and daughters. In D. M. Lavelle-Harvard & K. Anderson (Eds.), Mothers of the nations: Indigenous mothering as global resistance, reclaiming and recovery (pp. 195–205). Ontario: Demeter Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. (2007). On ethnographic refusal: Indigeneity, ‘voice’, and colonial citizenship. Junctures, 9, 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L. (2004). The epistolarium: On theorizing letters and correspondences. Auto/Biography, 12, 201–235.10.1191/0967550704ab014oa
   Google Scholar
• Trucks-Bordeaux, T. (2003). Academic massacres: The story of two American Indian women and their struggle to survive academia. American Indian Quarterly, 27(1–2), 416–419.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society., 1, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. (2001). What is Indigenous research methodology? Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(2), 175–179.
   Google Scholar
• Womack, C. S. (1999). Red on red: Native American literary separatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar