https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9953-0180
References
- Artiles, A. J. (2015). Beyond responsiveness to identity badges: Future research on culture in disability and implications for response to intervention. Educational Review, 67(1), 1–22. doi:10.1080/00131911.2014.934322
- CAST. (2011). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author.
- Castrodale, M. (2017). Critical disability studies and mad studies: Enabling new pedagogies in practice. The Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 29(1), 49–66.
- Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
- Gabel, S. L., Cohen, C. J., Kotel, K., & Pearson, H. (2013). Intellectual disability and space: Critical narratives of exclusion. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51(1), 74–80. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-51.01.074
- Goodley, D. (2007). Towards socially just pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian critical disability studies. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 317–334. doi:10.1080/13603110701238769
- Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability studies: Theorizing disableism and ableism. London: Routledge.
- Hehir, T. (2005). New directions in special education: Eliminating ableism in policy and practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. doi:10.3102/00028312032003465
- Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. doi:10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751
- Minow, M. (1990). Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion, and American law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Michalko, R. (2008). Double trouble: Disability and disability studies in education. In S. L. Gabel & S. Danforth (Eds.), Disability and the politics of education: An international reader (pp. 401–415). New York: Peter Lang.
- Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. doi:10.3102/0013189X12441244
- Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100. doi:10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77
- Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Thorius, K. A. K. (2016). Stimulating tensions in special education teachers' figured world: An approach toward inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(12), 1326–1343. doi:10.1080/13603116.2016.1168877
- Thorius, K. A. K., & Waitoller, F. R. (2017). Strategic coalitions against exclusion at the intersection of race and disability—A rejoinder. Harvard Educational Review, 87(2), 251–257. doi:10.17763/1943-5045-87.2.251
- Waitoller, F. R., & King Thorius, K. A. (2016). Cross-pollinating culturally sustaining pedagogy and universal design for learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for dis/ability. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 366–389. doi:10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.366
- Ware, L. P. (2002). A moral conversation on disability: Risking the personal in educational contexts. Hypatia, 17(3), 143–172. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb00945.x