Affective reflexivity: encounters of affects in the material labor of fieldwork

References

• Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. (2005). State-formation, teaching techniques, and globalisation as aporia. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(1), 45–77. doi:10.1080/01596300500040193
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K., & Kleinmann, A. (2012). Interview with Karan Barad by Adam Kleinmann. Special Documenta (13) Issue of Mousse Magazine 34. 76–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2004). The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter. Political Theory, 32(3), 347–372. doi:10.1177/0090591703260853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. G. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. (1990). Interview with Homi Bhabha: The third space. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 207–221). London, UK: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. (2015). Researching affect and embodied hauntologies: Exploring an analytic of experimentation. In B. T. Knudsen & C. Stage (Eds.), Affective methodologies (pp. 25–44). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L., & Venn, C. (2010). Affect. Body & Society, 16(1), 7–28. doi:10.1177/1357034X09354769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bøhling, F. (2015). The field note assemblage: Resaerching the bodily-affective dimensions of drinking and dancing ethnographically. In B. T. Knudsen & C. Stage (Eds.), Affective methodologies (pp. 161–182). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2006). American nightmare neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and de-democratization. Political Theory, 34(6), 690–714. doi:10.1177/0090591706293016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, S. (1974). Erewhon. London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C., Ho, P. S., & Chow, E. (2002). A body-mind-spirit model in health: An Eastern approach. Social Work in Health Care, 34(3–4), 261–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaput, C. (2010). Rhetorical circulation in late capitalism: Neoliberalism and the overdetermination of affective energy. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 43(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers, S. M. (2013). The materiality of fieldwork: An ontology of feminist becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(5), 599–609. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.786845
   Google Scholar
• Childers, S. M. (2014). Promiscuous analysis in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 819–826. doi:10.1177/1077800414530266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, P. T. (2007). Introduction. In P. T. Clough & J. Halley (Eds.), The affective turn: Theorizing the social (pp. 1–33). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1990). The logics of sense. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Gauttari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN & London, UK: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrness, A. (2011). Mothers united: An immigrant struggle for socially just education. Minneapolis, MN & London, UK: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972– 1977. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Gane, N. (2009). Concepts and the new empiricism. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 83–97. doi:10.1177/1368431008099645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. doi:10.1177/1077800403262360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295–337). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2004). Future girl: Young women in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. (2012). Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161. doi:10.1177/1464700112442643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, M. G. (2003). Where are you really from?': Representation, identity and power in the fieldwork experiences of a South Asian diasporic. Qualitative Research, 3(2), 229–242. doi:10.1177/14687941030032005
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.500628
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B., & Rodje, K. (2013). Deleuzian intersections: Science, technology, anthropology. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Juelskjaer, M. (2013). Gendered subjectivities of spacetimematter. Gender and Education, 25(6), 754–768. doi:10.1080/09540253.2013.831812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnieli-Miller, O., Strier, R., & Pessach, L. (2009). Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(2), 279–289. doi:10.1177/1049732308329306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N. H. J. (2015). The retreat of multiculturalism? Explaining the South Korean exception. American Behavioral Scientist, 596(6), 727–746. doi:10.1177/0002764214566497
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1998). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2006). Making a mess with method. In W. Outhwaite, & S. Turner (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social science methodology (pp. 595–606). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, X. J. (2009). Thinking like grass, with Deleuze in education? Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 7(2), 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, A., Abelmann, N., Kwon, S. A., & Okazaki, S. (2015). South Korea's education exodus: The life and times of study abroad. New York, NY: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lui, P. P., & Rollock, D. (2013). Tiger Mother: Popular and psychological scientific perspectives on Asian culture and parenting. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 83(4), 450–456. doi:10.1111/ajop.12043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
   Google Scholar
• Madison, D. S. (2011). The labor of reflexivity. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, 11(2), 129–138.
   Google Scholar
• Marn, T., & Wolgemuth, J. (2017). Purposeful entanglements: A new materialist analysis of transformative interviews. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(5), 365–374. doi:10.1177/1077800416659085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A. (2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 732–740. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788761
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, K. (2012). Toward a methodology of encounters opening to complexity in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 762–772. doi:10.1177/1077800412453018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, T. A. (2009). Seeing possible Futures: Khmer youth and the discourse of the American Dream. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(1), 62–81. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01028.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T., Birch, M., Mauthner, M., & Jessop, J. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research. Abingdon, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third world women and the politics of feminism (pp. 51–80). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ngo, B., & Lee, S. J. (2007). Complicating the images of model minority success: A review of Southeast Asian American education. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 415–153. doi:10.3102/0034654307309918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niccolini, A. D. (2016). Affect. In N. M. Rodriguez, W. J. Martino, J. C. Ingrey, & E. Brockenbrough (Eds.), Critical concepts in queer studies and education (pp. 5–11). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nordstrom, S. (2015). Not so innocent anymore: Making recording devices matter in qualitative interviews. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(4), 388–401. doi:10.1177/1077800414563804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C., Kidd, D., Patterson, R., Hanley, U. (2012). The politics of becoming…making time…. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(5), 418–426. doi:10.1177/1077800412439527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196. doi:10.1080/0951839032000060635
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (2005). Desire. In A. Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schrödinger, E. (1964). My view of the world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. (1999). Appendix: The setting to work of deconstruction. In G. Spivak (Ed.), A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present (pp. 423–431). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (1997a). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175–189. doi:10.1080/095183997237278
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (1997b). Nomadic inquiry in the smooth spaces of the field: A preface. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(3), 365–383. doi:10.1080/095183997237179
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative inquiry (4th ed., pp. 611–635). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788754
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, H. L. (2012). A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data. Feminist Theory, 13(3), 265–281. doi:10.1177/1464700112456001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, H. L. (2013). Images of thinking in feminist materialisms: Ontological divergences and the production of researcher subjectivities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 706–716.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86(1), 57–78. doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x
   Google Scholar
• Wallin, J. J. (2010). A Deleuzian approach to curriculum: Essay on a pedagogical life. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H. (2005). Aporias, responsibility, and the im/possibility of teaching multicultural education. Educational Theory, 55(1), 45–59. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2005.0004a.x
   Google Scholar
• Waxman, L. (2006). The coffee shop: Social and physical factors influencing place attachment. Journal of Interior Design, 31(3), 35–53. doi:10.1111/j.1939-1668.2006.tb00530.x
   Google Scholar