715
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Re-examining and reimagining power in participatory visual methodologies: a collaborative autoethnography

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 2138-2155 | Received 31 Jan 2020, Accepted 29 Jul 2021, Published online: 28 Sep 2021

References

  • Anyan, F. (2013). The influence of power shifts in data collection and analysis stages: A focus on qualitative research interview. The Qualitative Report, 18(36), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1525
  • Baez, B. (2002). Confidentiality in qualitative research: Reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001638
  • Barnhardt, C., & Phillips, C. (2018). At the margins of university work: The influence of campus climate and part-time faculty status on academic values. Journal of Academic Freedom, 9, 1–18.
  • Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K. C. (2013). Collaborative autoethnography. Left Coast.
  • Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
  • Conti, J. A., & O’Neil, M. (2007). Studying power: Qualitative methods and the global elite. Qualitative Research, 7(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107071421
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 1–32). Sage.
  • Finley, S. (2017). Critical arts-based inquiry: Performance of resistance politics. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 561–575). Sage.
  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin.
  • French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Institute for Social Research.
  • Gallagher, M. (2008). “Power is not an evil’’: Rethinking power in participatory methods. Children’s Geographies, 6(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280801963045
  • Guillemin, M., & Drew, S. (2010). Questions of process in participant-generated visual methodologies. Visual Studies, 25(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2010.502676
  • Holland, S., Renold, E., Ross, N. J., & Hillman, A. (2010). Power, agency and participatory agendas: A critical exploration of young people’s engagement in participative qualitative research. Childhood, 17(3), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568210369310
  • Huckaby, M. F. (2011). Researcher/researched: Relations of vulnerability/relations of power. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.529851
  • hooks, B. (2006). Homegrown: Engaged cultural criticism. South End.
  • Karnieli-Miller, O., Strier, R., & Pessach, L. (2009). Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(2), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308329306
  • Kelly, B. T., & Kortegast, C. (Eds.) (2017). Engaging images for research, pedagogy, and practice: Utilizing visuals to understand and promote college student development. Stylus.
  • Kelly, B. T., & McCann, K. (2014). Women faculty of color: Stories behind the statistics. The Urban Review, 46(4), 681–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-014-0275-8
  • Kelly, B. T., McCann, K., & Porter, K. (2018). White women’s faculty socialization: Persisting within and against a gendered tenure system. The Review of Higher Education, 41(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2018.0024
  • Kortegast, C. (2017). “But it’s not the space that I would need”: Narrative of LGBTQ students’ experiences in campus housing. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 43(2), 58–71.
  • Kortegast, C., McCann, K., Branch, K., Latz, A. O., Kelly, B. T., & Linder, C. (2019). Enhancing ways of knowing: The case for utilizing participant-generated visual methods in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 42(2), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0004
  • Kvale, S. (2006). Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406286235
  • Latz, A. O. (2017). Photovoice research in education and beyond: A practical guide from theory to exhibition. Routledge.
  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103
  • Lincoln, Y., & Cannella, G. S. (2004). Qualitative research, power, and the radical right. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262373
  • Marx, K. (1859). Preface to A contribution to the critique of political economy. Progress Publishers.
  • Minthorn, R. S. & Shotton, H. J. (Eds.). (2018). Reclaiming Indigenous research in higher education. Rutgers University.
  • Parsons, L. (2005). The problem of power. Review of Policy Research, 16(3-4), 278–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00886.x
  • Patel, L. (2014). Countering coloniality in educational research: From ownership to answerability. Educational Studies, 50(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.924942
  • Rose, G. (2014). On the relation between ‘visual research methods’ and contemporary visual culture. The Sociological Review, 62(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12109
  • Sallee, M. W. (2012). The ideal worker or the ideal father: Organizational structures and culture in the gendered university. Research in Higher Education, 53(7), 782–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9256-5
  • Stewart, D.-L. (2019). Ideologies of absence: Anti-Blackness and inclusion rhetoric in student affairs practice. Journal of Student Affairs, 28, 15–30.
  • Switzer, S. (2018). What’s in an image?: Towards a critical and interdisciplinary reading of participatory visual methods. In M. Capous-Desyllas & K. Morgaine (Eds.), Creating social change through creativity: Anti-oppressive arts-based research methodologies (pp. 189–207). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Winston, A. S. (2004). Defining difference: Race and racism in the history of psychology. American Psychological Association.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.