Reconceptualizing online discussion forums as a fabricated focus group: illuminating educators’ language ideologies through asynchronous discussion posts

References

• Acolatse, T. W. (2016). Enhancing the online classroom: Transitioning from discussion to engagement. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 19. http://oldlibrary.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/fall193/acolatse193.html
   Google Scholar
• Alcorn, M. W. (2002). Changing the subject in English class: Discourse and the subject of desire. Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alim, H.S. (2016). Who's afraid of the transracial subject. In H.S Alim and John Rickford (eds.), Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race (pp. 35–50). Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. T., Ambroso, E., Cruz, J., Zuiker, S., & Rodriguez-Martinez, S. (2021). Complicating methods for understanding educators’ language ideologies: Transformative approaches for mixing methods. Language and Education, doi:10.1080/09500782.2021.1931296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen, M. A. (2009). Asynchronous discussion forums: Success factors, outcomes, assessments, and limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 249–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assaf, L. C., & Dooley, C. M. (2010). Investigating ideological clarity in teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 45(3), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2010.489144
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, C. K. (2020). “It’s not really my job”: A mixed methods framework for language ideologies, monolingualism, and teaching emergent bilingual learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(2), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118783188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banes, L. C., Martinez, D. C., Athanases, S. Z., & Wong, J. W. (2016). Self-reflexive inquiry into language use and beliefs: Toward more expansive language ideologies. International Multilingual Research Journal, 10(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2016.1185906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgrave, L. L., & Smith, J. K. (1995). Negotiated validity in collaborative ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100105
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, K. A., Kilinc, S., Troxel Deeg, M., Marley, S., Farrand, K., & Kelley, M. (2021). Language ideologies of Arizona preschool teachers implementing dual language teaching for the first time: Pro-multilingual beliefs, practical concerns. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(4), 457–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1476456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bost, X., Labatut, V., Gueye, S., & Linares, G. (2016). Narrative smoothing: Dynamic conversational network for the analysis of TV series plots. International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, IEEE/ACM, Avignon, France. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2016.7752379
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, D., & Kiger, G. (1994). Language attitudes of teachers scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(1), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164494054001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M. H., & Tobias, S. (2016). Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14. 10.3102/0013189X019005002
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, J., & Kellam, N. (2017). Restructuring structural narrative analysis: Using Campbell’s monomyth to understand participant narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 27(1), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.27.1.09cru.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daiute, C. (2014). Narrative inquiry: A dynamic approach. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1985). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Whittrock (Ed.), The handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). Institute for Research on Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S. (2014). Language ideologies of Arizona voters, language managers, and teachers. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 13(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2014.864211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S. (2018). Language ideology change over time: Lessons for language policy in the US state of Arizona and beyond. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 34–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S., Palmer, D. K., & Henderson, K. (2017). Educator language ideologies and a top-down dual language program. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(6), 704–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1071776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, S. W., & Ball, A. (2004). Ideological becoming: Bakhtinian concepts to guide the study of language. In A. Ball & S. W. Freedman (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning. (pp. 3–33). Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (2006). Nurturing dialogic hermeneutics and the deliberative capacities of communities in focus groups. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405282797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, O. (2017). Critical multilingual language awareness and teacher education. In J. Cenoz, D. Gorter & S. May (Eds.), Language awareness and multilingualism. (pp. 263–280). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gkaintartzi, A., & Tsokalidou, R. (2011). “She is a very good child but she doesn’t speak”: The invisibility of children’s bilingualism and teacher ideology. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 588–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, L. J. (2011). The product of text and ‘other’ statements: Discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6), 663–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00698.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. (2019). The danger of the dual-language enrichment narrative: Educator discourses constructing exclusionary participation structures in bilingual education. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 16(3), 155–177.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. (2017). Teacher language ideologies mediating classroom-level language policy in the implementation of dual language bilingual education. Linguistics and Education, 42, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoedemaekers, C., & Keegan, A. (2010). Performance pinned down: Studying subjectivity and the language of performance. Organization Studies, 31(8), 1021–1044. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610376145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2012). Varieties of narrative analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hudley, A. C., & Mallinson, C. (2011). Understanding English language variation in U.S. schools. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C. (2010). Implementational and ideological spaces in bilingual education language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050902780706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. (2007). Dialogue and the construction of knowledge in e-learning: Exploring students' perceptions of their learning while using blackboard's asynchronous discussion board. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning, 10(1). http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2007/Henry_Johnson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. J., Chen, A. T., & Carriere, R. M. (2017). De‐constructing the co‐construction: Researcher stance, the nature of data and community building in an online participatory platform to create a knowledge repository. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401023
   Google Scholar
• Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802004860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, A. J. (2005). Interaction in cyberspace: An online focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49(4), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03305.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H. (2016). Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of narrative research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kroskrity, P. (2004). Language ideology. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 496–517). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C. P., & Tan, S. C. (2001). Online discussion boards for focus group interviews: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(1), 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Madriz, E. (2000). Focus groups in feminist research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 835–850). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, R. A. (2013). Reading the world in Spanglish: Hybrid language practices and ideological contestation in a sixth-grade English language arts classroom. Linguistics and Education, 24(3), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2013.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, R. A., Hikida, M., & Durán, L. (2015). Unpacking ideologies of linguistic purism: How dual language teachers make sense of everyday translanguaging. International Multilingual Research Journal, 9(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2014.977712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moloney, M. F., Dietrich, A. S., Strickland, O., & Myerburg, S. (2003). Using internet discussion boards as virtual focus groups. Advances in Nursing Education, 26 (4), 274–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412–446. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. (2008). Building and destroying students’ ‘academic identities’: The power of discourse in a two‐way immersion classroom. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21(8), 647–687.
   Google Scholar
• Paugh, P., & Robinson, E. (2011). Keeping a ‘vigilant critique’: Unpacking critical praxis as teacher educators. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.538747
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080103
   Google Scholar
• Ransdell, S., Borror, J., & Su, A. (2018). Users not watchers: Motivation and the use of discussion boards in online learning. FLDA Journal, 3, 4. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=fdla-journal.
   Google Scholar
• Razfar, A. (2005). Language ideologies in practice: Repair and classroom discourse. Linguistics and Education, 16(4), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Razfar, A. (2012). Narrating beliefs: A language ideologies approach to teacher beliefs. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 43(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2011.01157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, J., & Burdick, C. (2017). Language ideologies. In O. Garcia, N. Flores, & M. Spotti (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 103–124). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, J. (2019). Looking like a language, sounding like a race: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and the Learning of Latinidad. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Paul R. Clyne. (Ed.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels (pp. 193–247). Chicago Linguistic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove. (2015). Language Rights,. In W. Wright, S. Boun, & O. García (eds.), The Handbook of Bilingual and Multilingual Education (pp. 185-202). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, T., & Janssenswillen, P. (2020). Multicultural teacher education: A cross-case exploration of pre-service language teachers’ approach to ethnic diversity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33(4), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1681536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, D. P. (1986). Narrative smoothing and clinical wisdom. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 211–232). Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. (2017). Online focus groups. Journal of Advertising, 46 (1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1252288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia Mazzanti, C., & Karsli-Calamak, E. (2020). “Kind of interrupting”: Teachers of young children undersanding mathematics learning and linguistic diversity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2020.1829740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Discourse, ideology, context. Folia Linguistica, 35(1–2), 11–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2001.35.1-2.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherall, M. (2001). Debates in discourse research. In M. Wetherall, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 380–399). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women's Studies International Forum, 21 (1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00080-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Fairchild, C. (2011). Collaborative learning and the importance of the discussion board. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 27(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756479310389609
   Google Scholar