Narrativizing digital pedagogy

References

• Andrews, M., Sclater, S. D., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (2004). Narrative research. In C. Seale, G, Gobo, J. F., Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 97–112). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. (2013). Controlling the work of teachers. In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (4th ed., pp. 167–182). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. (2007). The life story interview as a bridge in narrative inquiry. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 224–245). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1981). Discourse in the novel (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (pp. 269–422). University of Austin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1999a). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1963).
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1999b). Toward a philosophy of the act (V. Liapunov, Trans.). In V. Liapunov & M. Holquist (Eds.), Toward a philosophy of the act (3rd ed., pp. 1–76). University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberg, M. (2012). Why narrative? Narrative Inquiry, 22(1), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.22.1.16bam
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, A., & Luke, A. (2013). Re-engaging marginalized youth through digital music production: Performance, audience and evaluation. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 8(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2013.796692
   Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canuel, M. J., & White, B. J. (2014, July). Modeling pedagogy for teachers transitioning to the virtual classroom [Paper presentation]. International Conference e-Learning 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, M. (1998). Historical perspectives on teaching with technology in k-12 schools. New Jersey Journal of Communication, 6(2), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456879809367345
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. A. (2012). “Obligatory technologies”: Explaining why people feel compelled to use certain technologies. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 32(4), 255–264.
   Google Scholar
• Charon, R. (2007). What to do with stories: The sciences of narrative medicine. Canadian Family Medicine, 53(8), 1265–1267.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, S. E. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 651–679). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Josey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019005002
   Google Scholar
• Cristia, J., Ibarrarán, P., Cueto, S., Santiago, A., & Severín, E. (2017). Technology and child development: Evidence from the one laptop per child program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(3), 295–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. In G. Dall’Alba (Ed.), Exploring education through phenomenology: Diverse approaches (pp. 41–52). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, J. H., Crick, T., & Hourizi, R. (2020, April). The institute of coding: A university-industry collaboration to address the UK’s digital skills crisis [Paper presentation]. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9125272 https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125272
   Google Scholar
• Deng, F., Chai, C. S., So, H., Qian, Y., & Chen, L. (2017). Examining the validity of the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework for preservice chemistry teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagleton, T. (2003). Literary theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1979). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Elbaz-Luwisch, F. (2007). Studying teachers’ lives and experience: Narrative inquiry into K-12 teaching. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 357–382). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Eng, N. (2016). Education inequality: Broadening public attitudes through framing. Journal of Social Issues, 72(4), 676–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., Sugai, G., Simonsen, B., & Everett, S. (2017). MTSS coaching: Bridging knowing to doing. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A., & O’Donnell-Allen, C. (2015). Pose, wobble, flow: A cultural proactive approach to literacy instruction. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (1984). “Excellence,” meanings, and multiplicity. Teachers College Record, 86(2), 283–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination. Josey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Heitink, M., Voogt, J., Verplanken, l., van Braak, J., & Fisser, P. (2016). Teachers’ professional reasoning about their pedagogical use of technology. Computers & Education, 101, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holquist, M. (2002). Dialogism (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Arum, R., Conley, D., Guttiérez, K., Kirshner, B., Livingstone, S., Michalchik, V., Penuel, W., Peppler, K., Pinkard, N., Rhodes, J., Tekinbas, K. S., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2020). The connected learning research network: Reflections on a decade of engaged scholarship [Report]. Connected Learning Alliance. https://clalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CLRN_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Josselson, R. (2007). The ethical attitude in narrative research. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 537-566). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., Pieters, J., & Voogt, J. (2015). ICT use in science and mathematics teacher education in Tanzania: Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H. (2015). Understanding narrative inquiry. SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H., & Macintyre Latta, M. (2009). Narrative inquiry: Seeking relations as modes of interactions. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(2), 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903323164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. S., & Xing, X. (2019). Appropriation of affordances of multiliteracies for Chinese literacy teaching in Canada. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0095-2
   Google Scholar
• Knupfer, N. N. (1993). Teachers and educational computing: Changing roles and changing pedagogy. In R. Muffoletto & N. N. Knupfer (Eds.), Computers in education: Social, political, & historical perspectives (pp. 163–179). Hampton Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. (1980). The bounded text (T. Gora, A. Jardine, & L. S. Roudiez, Trans.). In L. S. Roudiez (Ed.), Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art (pp. 36–63). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, A., Reddy, L. A., & Glover, T. A. (2017). A multidisciplinary framework of instructional coaching. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1260404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., Knobel, M., (2007). Knobel and Lankshear on the new literacies. In M. Knobel, & Lankshear, C. (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 2–17). Peter Lang. http://newlearningonline.com/literacies/chapter-2/knobel-and-lankshear-on-the-new-literacies
   Google Scholar
• Lapan, S. D., Quartaroli, M. T., & Reimer, F. J. (2012). Introduction to qualitative research. In S. D. Lapan, M. T. Quartaroli, & F. J. Reimer (Eds.), Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs (pp. 3–18). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807017
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Brett, C. (2015). Dialogic understanding of teachers' online transformative learning: A qualitative case study of teacher discussions in a graduate-level online course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemley, C. K., & Mitchell, R. W. (2012). Narrative inquiry: Stories lived, stories told. In S. D. Lapan, M. T. Quartaroli, & F. J. Reimer (Eds.), Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs. (pp. 215–242). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, C. (1987). Explanatory systems in oral life stories. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 343–368). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lohnes Watulak, S., & Kinzer, C. K. (2013). Beyond technology skills: Toward a framework for critical digital literacies in pre-service technology education. In J. Ávila & J. Z. Pandya (Eds.), Critical digital literacies as social praxis: Intersections and challenges (pp. 127–153). Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2004). Literacy and educational fundamentalism: A conversation with Dr. Allan Luke (H. Attarian, & X. L. Curdt-Christiansen, Interviewers). English Quarterly, 36(4), 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2018). Looking at the next 20 years of multiliteracies: A discussion with Allan Luke (A. Garcia & R. Seglem, Interviewers). Theory into Practice, 57(1), 72–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahiri, J. (2004). New teachers for new times: The dialogical principle in teaching and learning electronically. In A. F. Ball & S. W. Freedman (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 213–231). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J., & Merrotsy, P. (2006). Portfolio of artefacts: Promising data for qualitative research. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 15(1), 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Maslin, P., & Smith, N. (2017). Practicum as Nexus: Using student voice to improve digital pedagogy within ITE. Waikato Journal of Education, 22(3), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v22i3.376
   Google Scholar
• Mertova, P., & Webster, L. (2012). Critical event narrative inquiry in higher education quality. Quality Approaches in Higher Education, 3(2), 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mirazaee, A., & Aliakbari, M. (2017). Ethicality of narrative inquiry as a tool of knowledge production in research. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 199–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. G. (1999). Storylines: Craftarists’ narratives of identity. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. (2011). The seven trans-disciplinary habits of mind: Extending the TPACK framework towards 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 51(2), 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novoa, M. (2018). Industrial design education as innovation broker through making, pivot thinking, autopoiesis and expansive learning. Design & Technology Education, 23(3), 120–153.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on student equity and inclusion: Supporting vulnerable students during school closures and school re-openings. http://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-student-equity-and-inclusion-supporting-vulnerable-students-during-school-closures-and-school-re-openings-d593b5c8/#section-d1e3202
   Google Scholar
• Omoso, E., & Odindo, F. (2020). TPACK in teacher education: Using pre-service teachers’ self-reported TPACK to improve pedagogic practice. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(5), 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnegar, S., & Daynes, J. G. (2007). Locating narrative inquiry historically: Thematics in the turn to narrative. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 3–34). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Puentedura, R. (2014). SAMR: A contextualized introduction [Powerpoint slides]. http://hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/01/15/SAMRABriefContextualizedIntroduction.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rico, R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2015). Examining the role of the instructor in problem-centered instruction. TechTrends, 59(4), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0876-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riikonen, S. M., Kangas, K., Kokko, S., Korhonen, T., Hakkarainen, K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2020). The development of pedagogical infrastructures in three cycles of maker-centered learning projects. Design and Technology Education, 25(2), 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2007). Education, eco-progressivism and the nature of school reform. Educational Studies, 41(3), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131940701325688
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, A. G. (2007). The unsayable, Lacanian psychoanalysis, and the art of narrative interviewing. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 81–98). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, J. (2017). Pedagogy meets digital media: A tangle of teachers, strategies, and tactics. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 17(2), 168–193.
   Google Scholar
• Seglem, R. (2015). Driving into the gap: Decision-making for infusing technology in schools. In Keengwe, J., Mbae, J. G., & Ngigi S. K. (Eds.), Promoting global literacy skills through technology-infused teaching and learning (pp. 63–85). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Seglem, R., & Garcia, A. (2018). Changing literacies and civic pathways: Multiliteracies in inquiry-driven classrooms. Theory into Practice, 57(1), 56–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Basic Books, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., Scollon, S. W., & Jones, R. H. (2012). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Shing, C. L., Saat, R. M., & Loke, S. H. (2015). The knowledge of teaching - pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(3), 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Journal of Education- Boston University School of Education, 193(3), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sidorkin, A. M. (1997). Carnival and domination: Pedagogies of neither care nor justice. Educational Theory, 47(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1997.00229.x
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Stornaiuolo, A., & Phillips, N. C. (2018). Multiplicities in motion: A turn to transliteracies. Theory into Practice, 57(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1390334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. E., Kahlke, R., & Judd, T. (2020). Not just digital natives: Integrating technologies in professional education contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawfik, A. A., & Kolodner, J. L. (2016). Systematizing scaffolding for problem-based learning: A view from case-based reasoning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1), 6. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol10/iss1/6/ https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonbuloğlu, I., & Kiyici, M. (2018). Opinions of preservice teachers on their acceptance of the use of mobile technologies for teaching purposes. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(6), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i6.3230
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G. (2009). The chronotopes of encounter and emergence. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 25(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, E. K. (2020, May 5). Technology in schools – A tool and a strategy. People for Education. https://peopleforeducation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Technology-In-Schools-Final-May-5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Webster, L., & Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, F. L., Charmaz, K., McMullen, L. M., Josselson, R., Anderson, R., & McSpadden, E. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2010). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar