Reflexivity over caste and gender: disrupting researcher’s bias beliefs and habitus

References

• Acharya, T. (2017). Nepal Himalaya: Women, politics, and administration. Journal of International Women's Studies, 18(4), 197–208.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattachan, K. B., Sunar, T. B., & Bhattachan, Y. K. (2009). Caste-based discrimination in Nepal. Indian Institute of Dalit Studies New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Bishwakarma, M. (2017). Democratic politics in Nepal: Dalit political inequality and representation. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(3), 261–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891116660633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishwakarma, M. B. (2018). Political transformation in Nepal: Dalit inequality and justice University of Sydney. Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Social Science Information, 24(2), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901885024002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. American Sociological Association, 7(1), 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990a). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990b). The logic of practice. Polity Press; B. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2003a). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In C. Jenks (Ed.), Culture: Critical concepts in sociology (Vol. 3, pp. 63–99). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2003b). Participant objectivation. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouzanis, C., & Kemp, S. (2020). The two stories of the habitus/structure relation and the riddle of reflexivity: A meta-theoretical reappraisal. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 50(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boylorn, R. M., & Orbe, M. P. (2014). Critical autoethnography: Intersecting cultural identities in everyday life (Vol. 1). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, A. (2006). Gendering knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2–3), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Causadias, J. M., & Umaña-Taylor, A. J. (2018). Reframing marginalization and youth development: Introduction to the special issue. The American Psychologist, 73(6), 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collyer, F., Connell, R., Maia, J., & Morrell, R. (2019). Knowledge and global power: Making new science in the south. Monash University Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2014). Rethinking gender from the south. Feminist Studies, 40(3), 518–539. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.15767/feministstudies.40.3.518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, C., Burke, C., & Murphy, M. (2019). Capturing habitus: Theory, method and reflexivity. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1420771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. L. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28(4), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562904264440
   Google Scholar
• Dahal, D. R. (2003). Social composition of the population: caste/ethnicity and religion in Nepal. Population Monograph of Nepal, 1, 87–135.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2017). Doing reflexivity: An introduction. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devkota, K. R. (2018). Navigating exclusionary-inclusion: school experience of Dalit EFL learners in rural Nepal. Journal of Language. Culture and Communication, 6, 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, G., & Kamberelis, G. (2006). Theory for education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson, J. E. (2019). Reflexivity in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(2), 220–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419830990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutt, A. (2018). Locating patriarchy in violence against women in India: Social, legal and alternative responses. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.42.212228
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2002a). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2002b). "Outing" the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129120052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2008). Reflecting on reflective practice. PBPL Paper, 52, 1–27. http://oro.open.ac.uk/68945/1/Finlay-(2008)-Reflecting-on-reflective-practice-PBPL-paper-52.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R. M., & Christian, A. (2008). What happens when we unpack the invisible knapsack? Intersectional political consciousness and inter-group appraisals. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 404–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9439-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenfell, M. (2012). Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts. 2nd ed. Acumen Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Guinée, N. (2014). Empowering women through education: Experiences from Dalit women in Nepal. International Journal of Educational Development, 39, 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C. (2012). Hysteresis. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 126–145). Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• James, D. (2015). How Bourdieu bites back: Recognising misrecognition in education and educational research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.987644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (2002). Pierre Bourdieu. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2012). An introduction to using video for research. NCRM Working Paper 03, 12, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. (2019). Gender on the box: Self-reflexivity as a starting point. Communication Teacher, 33(3), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2018.1467565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., & McLeod, J. (2004). Bourdieu's reflexive sociology and 'spaces of points of view': Whose reflexivity, which perspective? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 525–544. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4128675 https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000236998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkby, J., Moss, J., & Godinho, S. (2015). Using the art of trompe l’oeil to research induction and mentoring. Teaching Education, 26(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2014.959486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazard, L., & McAvoy, J. (2020). Doing reflexivity in psychological research: What’s the point? What’s the practice? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1400144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipp, A. (2007). Developing the reflexive dimension of reflection: A framework for debate [Journal Article]. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 1 (1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.455.1.1.18
   Google Scholar
• Mackinnon, C. (2006). Desire and power. In E. Hackett & S. Haslanger (Eds.), Theorizing feminism. (pp. 262–173). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, M. (2019). Women and the perpetuation of caste system in Nepal. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 13, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v12i0.26183
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J., Boettcher-Sheard, N., Duque, C., & Lashewicz, B. (2018). Who do we think we are? Disrupting notions of quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 28(4), 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317748896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T., Russo, A., & Torres, L. (1991). Third world women and the politics of feminism (Vol. 632). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, R., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2019). Intersectional consciousness in collective victim beliefs: Perceived intragroup differences among disadvantaged groups. Political Psychology, 40(5), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, U. (2013). Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions, and third world feminism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635
   Google Scholar
• Probst, B. (2015). The eye regards itself: Benefits and challenges of reflexivity in qualitative social work research. Social Work Research, 39(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svu028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, D. (1997). Feminist theory, habitus, and social class: Disruption of notion of classlessness. Women's Studies International Forum, 20(2), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00003-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed-Danahay, D. (2017). Bourdieu and critical autoethnography: Implications for research, writing, and teaching. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 19(1), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v19i1.1368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. (2012). Contextualizing theories and practices of bricolage research. The Qualitative Report, 17(48), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G., & Sreedharan, J. (2015). Brahmanical patriarchy: A paradigm of patriarchal power. Research Journal of English Language and Literature, 3(2), 190–196.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2000). Social exclusion: concept, application, and scrutiny. A. D. Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2004). Capabilities, lists, and public reason: Continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics, 10(3), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000315163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaney, K., Tafreshi, D., & Wu, C. A. (2019). Philosophical reflexivity in psychological science: Do we have it? Does it matter? In K. C. O’Doherty, L. M. Osbeck, E. Schraube, & J. Yen (Eds.), Psychological studies of science and technology (pp. 237–256). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25308-0_11
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2015). Egalitarian habitus: Narratives of reconstruction in discourses of aspiration and change. In C. Costa & M. Murphy (Eds.), Bourdieu, habitus and social research: The art of application (pp. 21–38).Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137496928_2
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, P. L. (2020). Who knows? Reflexivity in feminist standpoint theory and Bourdieu. Gender & Society, 34(6), 922–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220966600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (1992). Towards a social praxeology: The structure and logic of Bourdieu's sociology. In P. Bourdieu & L. Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. J. D. (1989). For a socio-analysis of intellectuals: On "Homo Academicus”. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 34, 1–29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41035401
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, R. A. (1996). The problem of unconsciousness in qualitative research. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 24(3), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069889608253022
   Google Scholar