567
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Platicando y Mapeando: a Chicana/Latina feminist GIS methodology in educational research

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1659-1674 | Received 17 Sep 2021, Accepted 08 Oct 2022, Published online: 28 Feb 2023

References

  • Acevedo-Gil, N. (2019). Toward a critical race nepantlera methodology: Embracing liminality in anti-colonial research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 19(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708618819625
  • Anzaldúa, G. (1981). Speaking in tongues: A letter to 3rd world women writers. In C. Moraga & G. Anzaldúa (Eds.), This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color (pp. 165–173). Kitchen Table.
  • Anzaldúa, G. (2002). Now let us shift… the path of conocimiento… inner work, public acts. In G. Anzaldúa & A. Keating (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 540–578). Routledge.
  • Arriero, E., & Griffin, D. (2018). ¡ Adelante! A community asset mapping approach to increase college and career readiness for rural Latinx high school students. Professional School Counseling, 22(1), 2156759X1880027. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X18800279
  • Brady, M. (2002). Extinct lands, temporal geographies: Chicana literature and the urgency of space (Latin America otherwise). Duke University Press.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
  • Cruz, C. (2001). Toward an epistemology of a brown body. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(5), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390110059874
  • Delaney, D. (2002). The space that race makes. The Professional Geographer, 54(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00309
  • Delgado Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 555–583. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.68.4.5wv1034973g22q48
  • Delgado Bernal, D. (2001). Learning and living pedagogies of the home: The mestiza consciousness of Chicana students. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(5), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390110059838
  • Delgado Bernal, D. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800107
  • Delgado Bernal, D., Pérez Huber, L., & Malagón, M. C. (2018). Bridging theories to name and claim a critical race feminista methodology. In J. T. DeCuir-Gunby, T. K. Chpamn, & P. A. Schutz (Eds.), Understanding critical race research methods and methodologies: Lessons from the Field (pp. 109–121). Routledge.
  • Delgado Bernal, D., & Villalpando, O. (2002). An apartheid of knowledge in academia: The struggle over the “legitimate” knowledge of faculty of color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/713845282
  • Dickinson, S., & Telford, A. (2020). The visualities of digital story mapping: Teaching the 'messiness’ of qualitative methods through story mapping technologies. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(3), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1712686
  • Espino, M. M. (2018). Positionality as prologue: Encountering the self on the journey to transforming Latina/o/x educational inequities. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 120(14), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812001413
  • Espinoza-Herold, M. (2007). Stepping beyond Sí Se Puede: Dichos as a cultural resource in mother-daughter interaction in a Latino family. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 38(3), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2007.38.3.260
  • Fierros, C. O., & Delgado Bernal, D. (2016). Vamos a platicar: The contours of pláticas as Chicana/Latina feminist methodology. Chicana/Latina Studies, 15(2), 98–121.
  • Gaxiola Serrano, T. J. (2019). Las enseñanzas de la linea: Sense of self and academic experiences of Latina/o/x community college students in the Tijuana-San Diego borderlands [Doctoral dissertation]. UCLA.
  • Godinez, F. E. (2006). Haciendo que hacer: Braiding cultural knowledge into educational practices and policies. In D. Delgado Bernal, C. A. Elenes, F. E. Godinez, & S. Villenas (Eds.), Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: Feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology (pp. 25–38). State University of New York.
  • Herrera, J. (2016). Spatializing Chicano power: Cartographic memory and community practices of care. Social Justice, 42(3-4), 46.
  • Katz, C. (1992). All the world is staged: Intellectuals and the projects of ethnography. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 10(5), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1068/d100495
  • Keating, A., & Anzaldúa, G. (2015). Light in the dark/Luz en lo oscuro: Rewriting identity, spirituality, reality. Duke University Press.
  • Kobayashi, A., & Peake, L. (2000). Racism out of place: Thoughts on whiteness and an antiracist geography in the new millennium. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(2), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00202
  • Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Asset-Based Community Development Institute, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.
  • Kwan, M. (2002a). Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00309
  • Kwan, M. (2002b). Is GIS for women? Reflection on the critical discourse in the 1990s. Gender, Place and Culture, 9(3), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369022000003888
  • Kwan, M. P. (2007). Affecting geospatial technologies: Toward a feminist politics of emotion. The Professional Geographer, 59(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00588.x
  • Mansell, D. (2018). Learning and assessment with applied GIS. https://uoe.maps. arcgis.com/apps/Cascade/index.html?appid=403f426dc95247a3a19f33eeea1f4c27
  • Matsuda, M., Lawrence, C., Delgado, R., & Crenshaw, K. (1993). Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the first amendment. Westview Press.
  • Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Designing your study and selecting a sample. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 67(1), 73–104.
  • Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (1981). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. Persephone Press.
  • Neely, B., & Samura, M. (2011). Social geographies of race: Connecting race and space. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(11), 1933–1952. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.559262
  • Pacheco, D., & Vélez, V. N. (2009). Maps, mapmaking, and a critical pedagogy: Exploring GIS and maps as a teaching tool for social change. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 8, 273.
  • Pavlovskaya, M. (2009). Non-quantitative GIS. In M. Cope & S. Elwood (Eds.), Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach (pp. 13–37). SAGE.
  • Pavlovskaya, M., & St. Martin, K. (2007). Feminism and geographic information systems: From a missing object to a mapping subject. Geography Compass, 1(3), 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00028.x
  • Pelaez López, A. (2018, September). The X in Latinx is a wound, not a trend. ColorBloq. https://www.colorbloq.org/article/the-x-in-latinx-is-a-wound-not-a-trend
  • Pendleton Jiménez, K. (2006). Groundwork for Chicana pedagogy. In D. Delgado Bernal, C. A. Elenes, F. E. Godinez, & S. Villenas (Eds.), Chicana/Latina Education in Everyday Life: Feminista Perspectives on Pedagogy and Epistemology (pp. 219-230). State University of New York Press.
  • Pérez Huber, L. (2009). Challenging racist nativist framing: Acknowledging the community cultural wealth of undocumented Chicana college students to reframe the immigration debate. Harvard Educational Review, 79(4), 704–730. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.4.r7j1xn011965w186
  • Pérez Huber, L. (2016). Make America great again: Donald Trump, racist nativism and the virulent adherence to white supremacy amid US demographic change. Charleston Law Review, 10, 215.
  • Pérez Huber, L., Vélez, V. N., & Solórzano, D. (2018). More than ‘papelitos:’ A QuantCrit counterstory to critique Latina/o degree value and occupational prestige. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377416
  • Price, P. (2010). At the crossroads: Critical race theory and critical geographies of race. Progress in Human Geography, 34(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509339005
  • Pulido, L. (2000). Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(1), 12–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00182
  • Sáenz, R. (2008). A profile of Latinos in rural America. Carsey Institute.
  • Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Solórzano, D. G. (1997). Images and words that wound: Critical race theory, racial stereotyping, and teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24(3), 5–19. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478088
  • Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2001). Critical race and LatCrit theory and method: Counter-Storytelling. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(4), 471–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390110063365
  • St. Martin, K., & Pavlovskaya, M. (2010). Secondary data. In B. Gomez & J. P. Jones III (Eds.)., Research Methods in Geography (pp. 173–193). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2015). Relational validity and the “where” of inquiry: Place and land in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(7), 633–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414563809
  • Vélez, V. N., Torres, D. P., & Jaramillo, D. L. (2021). Trenzudas, Truchas, and Traviesas: Mapping higher education through a Chicana feminist cartography. In N. M. Garcia, C. SAlinas Jr., & J. Cisneros (Eds.)., Studying Latinx/a/o Students in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of Concepts, Theory, and Methodologies (pp. 106–120). Routledge.
  • Vélez, V., & Solórzano, D. G. (2017). Critical race spatial analysis: Conceptualizing GIS as a tool for critical race research in education. In D. Morrison, S. Annamma, & D. Jackson (Eds.), Critical race spatial analysis: Mapping to understand and address educational inequity (pp. 8–31). Stylus.
  • Villenas, S. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and co-optation in the field. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 711–732. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.4.3483672630865482

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.