Intersectional positionalities across gender, race, ethnicity and immigrant status in qualitative interviews

References

• Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthias, F. (2002). Where do I belong?: Narrating collective identity and translocal positionality. Ethnicities, 2(4), 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Arendell, T. (1997). Reflections on the researcher-researched relationship: A woman interviewing men. Qualitative Sociology, 20(3), 341–368.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. (1997). Narrative turn or blind alley? Qualitative Health Research, 7, 325–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broom, A., Hand, K., & Tovey, P. (2009). The role of gender, environment and individual biography in shaping qualitative interview data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(1), 51–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buford May, R. A. (2014). When the methodological shoe is on the other foot: African American interviewer and white interviewees. Qualitative Sociology, 37, 117–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. (2003). Reciting the self: Narrative representations of the self in qualitative interviews. Feminist Theory, 4(1), 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, S. V., & Cahnmann-Taylor, M. (2013). No child left with crayons: The imperative of arts-based education and research with language “minority” and other minoritized communities. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 243–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & Mccall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, E. R. (2020). Demarginalizing women of color in intersectionality scholarship in psychology: A Black feminist critique. Journal of Social Issues, 76(4), 1036–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin Dwyer, S., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2000). Aesthetics and the practices of qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 256–265.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender and Society, 21(1), 106–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enosh, G., & Ben-Ari, A. (2010). Cooperation and conflict in qualitative research: A dialectical approach to knowledge production. Qualitative Health Research, 20(1), 125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2011). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 23–45). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (fourth ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, A. M. (2007). Intersectionality as a normative and empirical paradigm. Politics and Gender, 3(2), 248–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, S. R. (2013). Am I my brother’s teacher? Black undergraduates, racial socialization, and peer pedagogies in predominantly White postsecondary vontexts. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 183–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Leonardo, Z. (2018). Intersectionality, race-gender subordination, and education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, A. (2015). ‘We especially welcome applications from members of visible minority groups’: Reflections on race, gender and life at three universities. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 18(5), 589–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, E. A. (2007). Open-ended interviews, power, and emotional labor. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36(3), 318–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren, L. (2011). Cofielding in qualitative interviews: Gender, knowledge, and interaction in a study of (pro)feminist men. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(4), 364–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, K., & Åkerström, M. (2013). Interviewees with an agenda: Learning from a “failed” interview. Qualitative Research, 13(6), 717–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnieli-Miller, O., Strier, R., & Pessach, L. (2009). Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(2), 279–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffmann, L. T. (2014). kvarter Reflexive participatory observation kvarter. Akademisk Kwarter, 9, 100–111.
   Google Scholar
• Khalifa, M. A., Jennings, M. E., Briscoe, F., Oleszweski, A. M., & Abdi, N. (2014). Racism? Administrative and community perspectives in data-driven decision-making: Systemic perspectives versus technical-rational perspectives. Urban Education, 49(2), 147–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Dorner, L. M. (2021). School board and district responses to demographic change: Competing discourses of equity, competition, and community. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 20(4), 255–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizlari, D., & Fouseki, K. (2018). Treating resistance as data in qualitative interviews. Qualitative Report, 23(8), 1951–1961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (2006). Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 480–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. (1997). Feminist research. Interviewing men: Vulnerabilities and Dilemmas. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20(4), 553–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Nicholson, H. L. (2021). When “model minorities” become “yellow peril” – Othering and the racialization of Asian Americans in the COVID-19 pandemic. Sociology Compass, 15(2), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, A. S. (2012). Doing age: Methodological reflections on interviewing. Qualitative Research, 13(6), 668–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manderson, L., Bennett, E., & Andajani-Sutjahjo, S. (2006). The social dynamics of the interview: Age, class, and gender. Qualitative Health Research, 16(10), 1317–1334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCorkel, J. A., & Myers, K. (2003). What difference does difference make? Position and privilege in the field. Qualitative Sociology, 26(2), 199–231.
   Google Scholar
• Moradi, B., & Grzanka, P. R. (2017). Using intersectionality responsibly: Toward critical epistemology, structural analysis, and social justice activism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(5), 500–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullings, B. (1999). Insider or outsider, both or neither: Some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum, 30, 337–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Museus, S. D., & Kiang, P. N. (2009). Deconstructing the model minority myth and how it contributes to the invisible minority reality in higher education research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 142, 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Narváez, R. F., Meyer, I. H., Kertzner, R. M., Ouellette, S. C., & Gordon, A. R. (2009). A qualitative approach to the intersection of sexual, ethnic, and gender identities. Identity, 9(1), 63–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National School Boards Association. (2018). Today’s school boards & their priorities for tomorrow. National School Boards Association.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, D. L., & O’Neill, B. J. (2004). Toward social justice: Teaching qualitative research. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24(3–4), 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Pagan, V. (2018). Being and becoming a “good” qualitative researcher? Liminality and the risk of limbo. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 14(1), 75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peshkin, A. (1988). In search of subjectivity – One’s own. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Pini, B. (2005). Interviewing men: Gender and the collection and interpretation of qualitative data. Journal of Sociology, 41(2), 201–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompper, D. (2010). Researcher-researched difference: Adapting an autoethnographic approach for addressing the racial matching issue. Journal of Research Practice, 6(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, A., & Peled, E. (2021). Gendered power relations in women-to-men interviews on controversial sexual behavior. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(3), 277–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Råheim, M., Magnussen, L. H., Sekse, R. J. T., Lunde, Å., Jacobsen, T., & Blystad, A. (2016). Researcher-researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 11, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapley, T. J. (2001). The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing: Some considerations on analysing interviews. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 303–323.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, S. A., & Yu, M. (2018). Intersectionality in Transnational Education Policy Research. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 93–121.
   Google Scholar
• Roer-Strier, D., & Sands, R. G. (2015). Moving beyond the ‘official story’: When ‘others’ meet in a qualitative interview. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (Ed.). (2011). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Wetzel, M. M. (2014). Designing critical literacy education through critical discourse analysis: Pedagogical and research tools for teacher researchers. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryen, A. (2002). Cross-cultural interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & Holstein, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 334–354). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, C., & Bertrand, M. (2022). “This is civil disobedience. I'll continue.”: The racialization of school board meeting rules. Journal of Education Policy, 37(2), 226–246.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, C., & Horsford, S. (2017). Putting the public back in public education: Community advocacy and education leadership under the Every Student Succeeds Act. Journal of School Leadership, 27, 725–754.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (2002). Reembodying qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 12(1), 104–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, M. L., & Wolkomir, M. (2002). Interviewing men. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 203–219). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Qualitative inquiry framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. J., & McDermott, C. (2004). Gender in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 519–544. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanggaard, L. (2007). The research interview as discourses crossing swords: The researcher and apprentice on crossing roads. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 160–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrant, A. (2014). Negotiating multiple positionalities in the interview setting: Researching across gender and generational boundaries. Professional Geographer, 66(3), 493–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefera, A. A., Powers, J. M., & Fischman, G. E. (2018). Intersectionality in education: A conceptual aspiration and research imperative. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), vii–xvii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urrieta, L. (2007a). Identity production in figured worlds: How some Mexican Americans become Chicana/o Activist Educators. Urban Review, 39(2), 117–144.
   Google Scholar
• Urrieta, L. (2007b). Figured worlds and education: An introduction to the special issue. Urban Review, 39(2), 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Vähäsantanen, K., & Saarinen, J. (2013). The power dance in the research interview: Manifesting power and powerlessness. Qualitative Research, 13(5), 493–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windsong, E. A. (2018). Incorporating intersectionality into research design: An example using qualitative interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(2), 135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar