Combining hermeneutic phenomenology and critical discourse analysis: a bricolage approach to research

References

• Alaszewski, A. (2006). Using diaries for social research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967/1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. (No. 10) Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, K. S. (2006). Research as bricolage: Embracing relationality, multiplicity and complexity. In Tobin, K. and Kincheloe, J.L. (Eds.), Doing Educational Research: A handbook (pp. 87–115). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (2001). Context is/as critique. Critique of Anthropology, 21(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X0102100102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bueddefeld, J., Murphy, M., Ostrem, J., & Halpenny, E. (2021). Methodological bricolage and COVID-19: An illustration from innovative, novel, and adaptive environmental behavior change research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(3), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211019496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. (introducing qualitative methods series). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, P. (2005). Missing links in mainstream CDA. In R. Wodak & P. Chilton (Eds.), A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity (vol. 13, pp. 19–51). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. (1998). Regulation inprogressivist’pedagogic discourse: Individualized teacher-pupil talk. Discourse & Society, 9(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• European Union, European Parliament. (2015). Report on empowering girls through education in the EU [2014/2250(INI)]. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0206_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2005). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2018). CDA as Dialectical Reasoning. In J. Flowerdew, J. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 13–26). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Frechette, J., Bitzas, V., Aubry, M., Kilpatrick, K., & Lavoie-Tremblay, M. (2020). Capturing lived experience: Methodological considerations for interpretive phenomenological inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940692090725. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920907254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1985). Reading the world and reading the word: An interview with Paulo Freire. Language Arts, 62(1), 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, M. (2019). Social constructions through socialization: The perspective of a constructivist socialization research. In M. Pfadenhauer & H. Knoblauch, (Eds.), Social Constructivism as Paradigm?: The Legacy of The Social Construction of Reality (pp. 91–104). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. (2004). Questions of disciplinarity/interdisciplinarity in a changing world. In J.L. Kincheloe & K.S. Berry (Eds.), Rigour and complexity in educational research: Conceptualizing the bricolage (pp. 50–81). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. (2011a). Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. In Key works in critical pedagogy (pp. 177–189). Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. (2011b). On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. In K. Hayes, S. R. Steinberg, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Key works in critical pedagogy (pp. 253–278). Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L., McLaren, P., Steinberg, S. R., & Monzó, L. D. (2018). Critical pedagogy and qualitative research: Advancing the bricolage. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 418–465). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (2007). Adult education and empowerment for individual and community development. Radical Learning for Liberation, 2, 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Papaioannou, E., & Gravani, M. N. (2018). Empowering vulnerable adults through second-chance education: a case study from Cyprus. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 37(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2018.1498140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, A. (2017). Bourdieu and higher education research: a bricolage approach. Higher Education Review, 49(3), 53–75.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(52), 1189–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.) Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pfadenhauer, M. (2019). Introduction. The reality of social constructivism. Introductory remarks. In M. Pfadenhauer & H. Knoblauch (Eds.), Social Constructivism as Paradigm?: The Legacy of The Social Construction of Reality (pp. 1–18). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, R. (2005). The potential of reflective journals in studying complexity “in action. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 2(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8726
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M., Sonenshein, S., & Feldman, M. (2022). Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120927466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsook, L. (2018). A methodological approach to hermeneutic phenomenology. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(1), 14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, H. (2019). Bricolage research in history education as a scholarly mixed-methods design. History Education Research Journal, 16(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.18546/HERJ.16.1.05
   Google Scholar
• Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, S. R., & Kincheloe, J. L. (2012). Employing the bricolage as critical research in science education. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1485–1500). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, S. R. (2015). Employing the bricolage as critical research in teaching English as a foreign language. In The Praxis of English Language Teaching and Learning (PELT) (pp. 7–25). SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sundström Sjödin, E. (2020). Empowerment (s) in practice: reading literature in a critical space. Pedagogy, Culture & Society.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2019). Empowering students for justice societies: a handbook for secondary school teachers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370901
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95–120). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Althouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wyk, M. M. (2017). An e-portfolio as empowering tool to enhance students’ self-directed learning in a teacher education course: A case of a South African university. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(3), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.20853/31-3-834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, T. R., & Zaidi, Z. (2022). Bricolage: A tool for race‐related, historically situated complex research. Medical Education, 56(2), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar