Do the eyes have it? Using eye tracking to assess students cognitive dimensions

References

• Al-Saai, A. J., & Dwyer, F. M. (1993). The effect of visualization on field-dependent and field-independent learners. International Journal of Instructional Media, 20, 243–249.
   Google Scholar
• Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2012). How do field-dependent and field-independent learners? Retrieved March 15, 2013, from http://www.icicte.org/Proceedings2012/Papers/03-1-Angeli.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aula, A., Majaranta, P., & Räihä, K. J. (2005). Eye-tracking reveals the personal styles for search result evaluation. In Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT (pp. 1058–1061). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boksem, M., Meijman, T., & Lorist, M. (2005). Effects of mental fatigue on attention: An ERP study. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 107–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., & Augustyn, J. S. (2009). Spatial and nonspatial integration in learning and training with multimedia systems. In A. E. Cook, R. Z. Zheng, & J. W. Blaz (Eds.), Measurement of cognitive load during multimedia learning activities (pp. 108–133). London: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, W. C. (2010). Cognitive style: A meta-analysis of the instructional implications for various integrated computer enhanced learning environments ( Doctoral dissertation thesis). Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Macredie, R. D. (2004). Cognitive modelling of student learning in web-based instructional programs. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 17, 375–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton, C., & Murrell, P. (1988). Learning styles. Washington, DC: National Teacher and Learning Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva, M. P., Courboulay, V., & Estraillier, P. (2011, September). Image complexity measure based on visual attention. Paper presented at the 18th Conference of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Bruxelles. Retrieved April 21, 2013, from http://toc.proceedings.com/13535webtoc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. L., & Moore, D. M. (2000). Interaction of cognitive style and learner control in a hypermedia environment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27, 369–384.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, D. P., & Cartnal R. B. (1999). Students’ learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teaching, 47, 130–135. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87567559909595802
   Google Scholar
• Dragon, K. (2009). Field dependence and student achievement in technology-based learning: A meta-analysis ( Master thesis). University of Alberta, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1992). Cognitive development: Past, present, and future. Developmental Psychology, 28, 998–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, M. (1984). Eye movement communication systems for computer control. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Technology & Technology Exchange: Technology and the World Around Us (pp. 34–35). Pittsburgh, PA: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., & Price, L. A. (1963). Kit of reference tests for cognitive skills. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Germanakos, P., Tsianos, N., Lekkas, Z., Mourlas, C., Belk, M., & Samaras, G. (2009). Towards an adaptive and personalized web interaction using human factors. In M. C. Angelides, P. Mylonas, & M. Wallace (Eds.), Advances in semantic media adaptation and personalization (pp. 247–282). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Godfroid, A., Housen, A., & Boers, F. (2010). A procedure for testing the noticing hypothesis in the context of vocabulary acquisition. In M. Pütz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition (pp. 169–197). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Graf, S., & Liu, T. C. (2008, July). Identifying learning styles in learning management systems by using indications from students’ behaviour. In P. Diaz, I. Aedo Kinshuk, & E. Mora (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 482–486). Santander: IEEE Computer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Granka, L. A., Joachims, T., & Gay, G. (2004). Eye-tracking analysis of user behaviour in www search. In SIGIR ‘04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information retrieval (pp. 478–479). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grier, R., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2007). How users view web pages: An exploration of cognitive and perceptual mechanisms. In P. Zaphiris, & S. Kurniawan (Eds.), Human computer interaction research in web design and evaluation (pp. 22–41). London: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D. H. Saklogske, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205–229). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gusentine, S. D., & Keim, M. C. (1996). The learning styles of community college art students. Community College Review, 24, 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Guisande, M. A., Páramo, M. F., Tinajero, C. Y., & Almeida, L. S. (2007). Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning. Psicothema, 19, 572–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1998). Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations, 51, 847–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 210–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hercegfi, K. (2011). Event related assessment of hypermedia based e-learning materials with an HRV based method that considers individual differences in users. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2, 119–127.
   Google Scholar
• Isaak-Ploegman, C. M., & Chinien, C. (2009). The implications of cognitive style to adult distance education. In R. Maclean, & D. Wilson (Eds.), International handbook of education for the changing world of work (pp. 2679–2695). The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, R. J. K. (1991). The use of eye movements in human-computer interaction techniques: What you look at is what you get. ACM Trans Information System, 9, 152–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, R. J. K. (1995). Eye tracking in advanced interface design. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process discrimination framework: Separating automatic form intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 531–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson, A. (2008). Adaptive user interfaces and agents. In A. Sears, & J. Jacko (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (pp. 433–458). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, C., Stevens, R., Glencross, M., & Chalmers, A. (2006). How people use presentation to search for a link: Expanding the understanding of accessibility on the web. Paper presented at the 2006 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (pp. 113–120). Edinburgh: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Józsa, E., & Hámornik, B. P. (2011). Find the difference!: Eye tracking study on information seeking behaviour using an online game. Journal of Eye tracking, Visual Cognition and Emotion. Retrieved May 11, 2013, from http://revistas.ulusofona.pt/index.php/JETVCE/article/view/2718
   Google Scholar
• Kahtz, A. W., & Kling, G. J. (1999). Field dependent and field-independent conceptualizations of various instructional methods with an emphasis on CAI: A qualitative analysis. Educational Psychology, 19, 413–428.
   Google Scholar
• Kinley, K., & Tjondronegoro, D. W.(2010, December). The impact of users’ cognitive style on their navigational behaviors in web searching. In Proceedings of 15th Australasian Document Computing Symposium (ADCS) (pp. 68–75). Melbourne: School of Computer Science and IT, RMIT University
   Google Scholar
• Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 269–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohse, G. L., & Johnson, E. J. (1996). A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 68, 28–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luk, S. C. (1998). The relationship between cognitive style and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean, R., & Wilson, D. (2009). International handbook of education for the changing world of work: Bridging academic and vocational training. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., Sasse, M. A., & Riegelsberger, J. (2004). Could I have the menu please? An eye tracking study of design conventions. In Proceedings of HCI 2003 (People and Computers XVII) (pp. 401–414). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Michailidou, E., Harper, S., & Bechhofer, S. (2008, September). Visual complexity and aesthetic perception of web pages. Paper presented at the 26th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of communication (pp. 215–224). Lisbon. Retrieved February 21, 2013, from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1456536&picked=prox
   Google Scholar
• Minogue, J., Jones, M. G., Broadwell, B., & Oppewall, T. (2006). The impact of haptic augmentation on middle school students’ conceptions of the animal cell. Virtual Reality, 10, 293–305.
   Google Scholar
• Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25, 175–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moallem, M. (2007). Accommodating individual differences in the design of online learning environments: A comparative study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 217–245.
   Google Scholar
• Nisiforou, E., & Laghos, A. (2012, September). A pilot study using electroencephalography and eye-tracking to assess and evaluate learning styles. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Conference International Council for Educational Media 2012, Nicosia. Retrieved April 13, 2013, from http://icem2012.cardet.org/index.php/conference-presentations-videos
   Google Scholar
• Nisiforou, E., & Michailidou, E. (2013). Cognitive abilities and visual complexity: Web users’ behaviour and perception. In 2nd Interaction Design & Human-Computer Interaction Workshop. Retrieved June 16, 2013, from https://sites.google.com/site/idhciworkshop/workshop-files
   Google Scholar
• Outing, S., & Ruel, L. (2006). Eyetrack III: What we saw through their eyes. A Project of the Poynter Institute. Retrieved January 20, 2013, from http://www.poynterextra.org/eyetrack2004/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porteous, J. D. (1996). Environmental aesthetics: Ideas, politics and planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin, 124, 372–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehder, B., & Hoffman, A. B. (2005). Eye tracking and selective attention in category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 51(1), 1–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193–215.
   Google Scholar
• Ritschel-Trifilo, P. M. (2009). The effect of following learning style pathways on learning and satisfaction in online biology laboratories for non-science-major undergraduates ( Doctoral dissertation thesis). Capella University, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (2005). Using eye-tracking data to understand first impressions of a website. Usability News, 7(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, E. J., & Leclerc, F. (1994). An eye-fixation analysis of choice processes for consumer nondurables. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 274–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. G., Simmons, R. R., & Hofman, M. A. (1979). Visual workload of the co-pilot/navigator during terrainight. Human Factors, 21, 369–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saracho, O.(2003). Matching teachers’ and students’ cognitive styles. Early Child Development and Care, 173, 161–173. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004430303097
   Google Scholar
• Solso, R. L., MacLin, M. K., & MacLin, O. H. (2005). Cognitive psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Spanoudis, G., & Kyza, E. A. (2009). Integrating knowledge of the cognitive system and e-learning application. In C. Mourlas, N. Tsianos, & P. Germanakos (Eds.), Cognitive and emotional processes in web-based education: Integrating human factors and personalization, Advances in Web-Based Learning Book Series (pp. 72–85). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Specht, M. (2012). Adaptive learning environment. Entry in TEL Thesaurus. Retrieved April 13, 2013, from http://www.tel-thesaurus.net/wiki/index.php/Adaptive_learning_environment
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinajero, C., & Paramo, M. F. (1997). Field dependence-independence and academic achievement: A re-examination of their relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toker, D., Conati, C., Steichen, B., & Carenini, G. (2013). Individual user characteristics and information visualization: Connecting the dots through eye tracking. In Proceedings of CHI 2013 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 295–304). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Towle, B., & Halm, M. (2005). Designing adaptive learning environments with learning design. In R. Koper, & C. Tattersall (Eds.), Learning design: A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training (pp. 215–226). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tsianos, N., Germanakos, P., Lekkas, Z., Mourlas, C., & Samaras, G. (2009). Eye-tracking Users’ Behavior in Relation to Cognitive Style within an E-Learning Environment. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 329–333). Riga, Latvia: IEEE Computer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gog, T., & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 95–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. (2005). Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. Higher Education, 49, 205–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Oltman, P. K., Goodenough, D. R., Friedman, F., Owen, D. R., & Raskin, E. (1977). Role of the field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles in academic evolution: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 197–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, M. (2004). Performance and perceived effectiveness in computer-based and computer-aided education: Do cognitive styles make a difference? Computers in Human Behaviour, 20, 517–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, M. (2009). Cognitive Styles and Design Interactions in Web-Based Education. In C. Mourlas, N. Tsianos, & P. Germanakos (Eds.), Cognitive and emotional processes in web-based education: Integrating human factors and personalization (pp. 58–71). London: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Wratcher, M. A., Morrison, E. E., Riley, V. L., & Scheirton, L. S. (1997). Curriculum and program planning: A study guide for the core seminar. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova Southeastern University.
   Google Scholar
• Yammoto, S., & Kuto, Y. (1992). A method of evaluating VDT screen layout by eye movement analysis. Ergonomics, 35, 591–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York, NY: Plenum press.
   Google Scholar
• Yesilada, Y., Jay, C., Stevens, R., & Harper, S. (2008). Validating the use and role of visual elements of web pages in navigation with an eye-tracking study. In Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 11–20), Beijing.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2004). Field-dependence/independence: Cognitive style or perceptual ability? – Validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1295–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar